Effects of hydrogen and strain rate on stress corrosion cracking mechanism of high strength pipeline steel

被引:0
|
作者
Gong, Ke [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Dongxu [1 ]
Liu, Xinyi [3 ]
Li, Jin [1 ]
Wu, Ming [1 ]
Hu, Min [4 ]
机构
[1] Liaoning Petrochem Univ, Coll Petr Engn, Key Lab Oil & Gas Storage & Transportat, Fushun 113001, Liaoning, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Ningbo Inst Mat Technol & Engn, Key Lab Marine Mat & Related Technol, Zhejiang Key Lab Marine Mat & Protect Technol, Ningbo 315201, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Mat Sci & Engn, Key Lab Adv Mat, Minist Educ, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[4] Pertrochina, Planning & Engn Inst, Beijing 100000, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
Stress corrosion cracking; Hydrogen pre-charging; Strain rate; X100; steel; PH; DISSOLUTION; CHLORIDE; EMBRITTLEMENT; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.112172
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Hydrogen considerably affects the stress corrosion cracking (SCC) susceptibility of high-strength pipeline steel. The SCC mechanism of verification phase X100 steel, which can withstand higher transport pressures and reduce equipment weight, was studied by performing slow strain rate test (SSRT) tests at different strain rates and hydrogen pre-charging times. The results show that hydrogen pre-charging forms numerous microcracks inside the sample, which then join under tensile stress and lead to internal structural defects inside the material. Additionally, hydrogen atoms promote crack propagation by increasing the local dissolution rate at the crack tip, which significantly improves the SCC susceptibility. The strain rate indirectly alters the process for ion exchange between sample and solution medium, this ultimately alters the rate of electrochemical corrosion at the crack tip. X100 steel demonstrated the highest SCC susceptibility when the growth rate at the crack tip was comparable to the anodic dissolution rate.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Sulfide stress corrosion cracking of high strength steel welded joints
    Han Jie/Welding & Joining, (05): : 2 - 7
  • [22] Study on Stress Corrosion Cracking Mechanism of Steel Wires with Different Strength Levels
    Zhao, Guangze
    Ma, Xu
    Ma, Ke
    METALS, 2025, 15 (02)
  • [23] Effect of microstructure on the sulphide stress cracking susceptibility of a high strength pipeline steel
    Ramirez, E.
    Gonzalez-Rodriguez, J. G.
    Torres-Islas, A.
    Serna, S.
    Campillo, B.
    Dominguez-Patino, G.
    Juarez-Islas, J. A.
    CORROSION SCIENCE, 2008, 50 (12) : 3534 - 3541
  • [24] Stress corrosion cracking behavior and mechanism of coated ultra-high strength steel 300 M
    Liu, Daoxin
    Jin, Shi
    He, Jiawen
    Huang, Shuju
    Hsi-An Chiao Tung Ta Hsueh/Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 1998, 32 (06): : 49 - 52
  • [25] STRESS CORROSION CRACKING OF HIGH STRENGTH STEELS - MECHANISM AND TESTING METHODS
    DESANTIS, R
    SONGA, T
    METALLURGIA ITALIANA, 1970, 62 (06): : 222 - &
  • [26] Strength effect in stress corrosion cracking of high-strength steel in aqueous solution
    Li, HL
    Gao, KW
    Qiao, LJ
    Wang, YB
    Chu, WY
    CORROSION, 2001, 57 (04) : 295 - 299
  • [27] Strength effect in stress corrosion cracking of high-strength steel in aqueous solution
    Li, HL
    Hui, WJ
    Wang, YB
    Dong, H
    Weng, YQ
    Chu, WY
    ACTA METALLURGICA SINICA, 2001, 37 (05) : 512 - 516
  • [28] Strength effect in stress corrosion cracking of high-strength steel in aqueous solution
    Li, H.
    Hui, W.
    Wang, Y.
    Dong, H.
    Weng, Y.
    Chu, W.
    Jinshu Xuebao/Acta Metallurgica Sinica, 2001, 37 (05): : 512 - 516
  • [29] Effect of strain rate on stress corrosion cracking of X100 pipeline steel in environments with sulfate-reducing bacteria
    Wu, Ming
    Gong, Ke
    Xie, Fei
    Wang, Dan
    Liu, Guangxin
    Liaoning, Fushun
    MATERIALS TESTING, 2018, 60 (03) : 229 - 237
  • [30] Stress corrosion cracking of gas pipeline steels of different strength
    Zvirko, O. I.
    Savula, S. F.
    Tsependa, V. M.
    Gabetta, G.
    Nykyforchyn, H. M.
    21ST EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON FRACTURE, (ECF21), 2016, 2 : 509 - 516