Impact of body composition parameters, age, and tumor staging on gastric cancer prognosis

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Wei [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Zhu, Hai [3 ,6 ]
Dong, Hai-Zheng [2 ]
Qin, Zheng-Kun [2 ]
Huang, Fu-Ling [5 ]
Yu, Zhu [5 ]
Liu, Shi-Yu [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Wang, Zhen [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Chen, Jun-Qiang [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Guangxi Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Gastrointestinal Gland Surg, 6 Shuangyong Rd, Nanning 530021, Peoples R China
[2] Guangxi Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Pediat Surg, Nanning, Peoples R China
[3] Guangxi Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Guangxi Key Lab Enhanced Recovery Surg Gastrointes, Nanning, Peoples R China
[4] Guangxi Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Guangxi Clin Res Ctr Enhanced Recovery Surg, Nanning, Peoples R China
[5] Guangxi Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Reg Engn Res Ctr Artific, Nanning, Peoples R China
[6] Guangxi Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Hepatobiliary Surg, Nanning, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
body composition; decision tree; gastric cancer; prognosis; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; SKELETAL-MUSCLE; RADICAL GASTRECTOMY; MALNUTRITION; SARCOPENIA; SURVIVAL; OUTCOMES; PREDICTOR; CACHEXIA; GLIM;
D O I
10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000917
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundResearch studies on gastric cancer have not investigated the combined impact of body composition, age, and tumor staging on gastric cancer prognosis. To address this gap, we used machine learning methods to develop reliable prediction models for gastric cancer.MethodsThis study included 1,132 gastric cancer patients, with preoperative body composition and clinical parameters recorded, analyzed using Cox regression and machine learning models.ResultsThe multivariate analysis revealed that several factors were associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in gastric cancer. These factors included age (>= 65 years), tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging, low muscle attenuation (MA), low skeletal muscle index (SMI), and low visceral to subcutaneous adipose tissue area ratios (VSR). The decision tree analysis for RFS identified six subgroups, with the TNM staging I, II combined with high MA subgroup showing the most favorable prognosis and the TNM staging III combined with low MA subgroup exhibiting the poorest prognosis. For OS, the decision tree analysis identified seven subgroups, with the subgroup featuring high MA combined with TNM staging I, II showing the best prognosis and the subgroup with low MA, TNM staging II, III, low SMI, and age >= 65 years associated with the worst prognosis.ConclusionCox regression identified key factors associated with gastric cancer prognosis, and decision tree analysis determined prognoses across different risk factor subgroups. Our study highlights that the combined use of these methods can enhance intervention planning and clinical decision-making in gastric cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 275
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The effects of hematological parameters and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes on prognosis in patients with gastric cancer
    Dirican, Ahmet
    Ekinci, Nese
    Avci, Arzu
    Akyol, Murat
    Alacacioglu, Ahmet
    Kucukzeybek, Yuksel
    Somali, Isil
    Erten, Cigdem
    Demir, Lutfiye
    Can, Alper
    Bayoglu, Ibrahim Vedat
    Koyuncu, Betul
    Ulger, Eda
    Tarhan, Mustafa Oktay
    CANCER BIOMARKERS, 2013, 13 (01) : 11 - 20
  • [22] Impact of Tumor Grade on Prognosis in Pancreatic Cancer: Should We Include Grade in AJCC Staging?
    Wasif, Nabil
    Ko, Clifford Y.
    Farrell, James
    Wainberg, Zev
    Hines, Oscar J.
    Reber, Howard
    Tomlinson, James S.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 17 (09) : 2312 - 2320
  • [23] Lymph node or lymphoid aggregate? Impact on cancer resection quality, clinical prognosis, and tumor staging
    Gocht, Andreas
    Watermann, Christian
    Melzer, Madelaine
    Schumacher, Udo
    HISTOLOGY AND HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2025, 40 (02) : 133 - 146
  • [24] Impact of Tumor Grade on Prognosis in Pancreatic Cancer: Should We Include Grade in AJCC Staging?
    Nabil Wasif
    Clifford Y. Ko
    James Farrell
    Zev Wainberg
    Oscar J. Hines
    Howard Reber
    James S. Tomlinson
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2010, 17 : 2312 - 2320
  • [25] Impact of Tumor Grade on Prognosis in Pancreatic Cancer: Should We Include Grade in AJCC Staging?
    Wasif, N.
    Ko, C. Y.
    Farrell, J.
    Wainberg, Z.
    Hines, O. J.
    Reber, H.
    Tomlinson, J. S.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 17 : S91 - S91
  • [26] The significance of tumor markers for preoperative staging in gastric cancer
    Kitakata, H
    Takahashi, Y
    Mai, M
    3RD INTERNATIONAL GASTRIC CANCER CONGRESS, 1999, : 841 - 846
  • [27] Effect of age on prognosis in patients with gastric cancer
    Saito, H
    Osaki, T
    Murakami, D
    Sakamoto, T
    Kanaji, S
    Tatebe, S
    Tsujitani, S
    Ikeguchi, M
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2006, 76 (06) : 458 - 461
  • [28] Impact of gender on bladder cancer incidence, staging, and prognosis
    Harun Fajkovic
    Joshua A. Halpern
    Eugene K. Cha
    Atessa Bahadori
    Thomas F. Chromecki
    Pierre I. Karakiewicz
    Eckart Breinl
    Axel S Merseburger
    Shahrokh F. Shariat
    World Journal of Urology, 2011, 29 : 457 - 463
  • [29] Impact of gender on bladder cancer incidence, staging, and prognosis
    Fajkovic, Harun
    Halpern, Joshua A.
    Cha, Eugene K.
    Bahadori, Atessa
    Chromecki, Thomas F.
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    Breinl, Eckart
    Merseburger, Axel S.
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 29 (04) : 457 - 463
  • [30] Impact of gastrectomy on body composition within 1 month in patients with gastric cancer
    Osaki, Tomohiro
    Matsunaga, Tomoyuki
    Makinoya, Masahiro
    Shishido, Yuji
    Miyatani, Kozo
    Uchinaka, Ei
    Tada, Yoichiro
    Ashida, Keigo
    Tatebe, Shigeru
    Fujiwara, Yoshiyuki
    SURGERY TODAY, 2023, 53 (07) : 834 - 844