Comparison of Clinical Effects and Physical Examination of Transforaminal and Caudal Steroid Injection With Targeted Catheter in Lumbar Radiculopathy: A Single-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:0
|
作者
Imani, Farnad [1 ]
Mohammad-Esmaeel, Faezeh [1 ]
Morsalli, Seyedeh-Fatemeh [1 ]
Ahani-Azari, Ali [1 ]
Alimian, Mahzad [1 ]
Nikoubakht, Nasim [1 ]
Emami, Azadeh [1 ]
机构
[1] Iran Univ Med Sci, Pain Res Ctr, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Tehran, Iran
来源
BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR | 2024年 / 14卷 / 10期
关键词
caudal; epidural; lumbar radiculopathy; steroid; targeted catheter; transforaminal; DISC HERNIATION; EPIDURAL NEUROPLASTY; RADICULAR PAIN; INTERLAMINAR; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1002/brb3.70067
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Background: Transforaminal and caudal epidural injections are two methods of steroid injection in lumbar radiculopathy. Using a targeted catheter with the possibility of accessing the involved spinal roots and steroid administration selectively next to them during the caudal procedure may achieve the benefits of both transforaminal and caudal procedures. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical effects and physical examinations of transforaminal steroid injection compared to caudal through a targeted catheter in lumbar radiculopathy. Methods: Fifty patients with lumbar radiculopathy candidates for epidural steroid injection were divided into transforaminal (T) and caudal (C) groups. Steroid injection under fluoroscopic guidance was performed in group T with the transforaminal method and in group C with the caudal method using a targeted catheter for each involved spinal nerve root. Pain intensity visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), daily analgesic consumption, and physical examinations on four follow-ups (before injection, second week, first and third month) were evaluated. Results: Pain score (VAS) and functional disability index (ODI) were similar in both groups, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). The positive Las & egrave;gue test was significantly higher in the caudal group than in the transforaminal group only in the third month (p < 0.05). Other physical examinations in both groups did not have significant differences in all the follow-ups. Moreover, there was no difference in the amount of analgesic consumption in the two groups. No complications were observed in both groups. Conclusion: This study showed that transforaminal and caudal steroid injection (with a targeted catheter) in patients with lumbar radiculopathy had similar effects in controlling pain and improving functional disability of patients in the short term. Cases of recurrence of positive Las & egrave;gue test in physical examinations in the long term (third month) in the caudal group may indicate the preference of the transforaminal approach.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Physiotherapeutic approach in seamstresses with neck pain: A single-blind, randomized clinical trial
    De Toni, Morgana Martins
    Duarte, Rafael Silveira
    Siqueira das Neves, Lais Mara
    Diefenthaeler, Fernando
    Registro Fonseca, Marisa de Cassia
    Barbosa, Rafael Inacio
    Kuriki, Heloyse Uliam
    Marcolino, Alexandre Marcio
    JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES, 2022, 31 : 90 - 96
  • [32] Single-blind randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in children
    Roy, A
    Parker, SJ
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 88 (09) : 1264 - 1265
  • [33] Single-blind randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in children
    Lintula, H
    Kokki, H
    Vanamo, K
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 88 (04) : 510 - 514
  • [34] Effects of myofascial release technique in patients with unilateral cervical radiculopathy: A single blind-randomized clinical trial
    Bali, Fatih
    Bayram, Guelay Aras
    EXPLORE-THE JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND HEALING, 2024, 20 (05)
  • [35] Effects of a gluten challenge in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: a randomized single-blind controlled clinical trial
    Saeede Saadati
    Amir Sadeghi
    Hamid Mohaghegh-Shalmani
    Mohammad Rostami-Nejad
    Luca Elli
    Hamid Asadzadeh-Aghdaei
    Luis Rodrigo
    Mohammad Reza Zali
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [36] Effects of joint effusion on proprioception in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a single-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial
    Cho, Y. R.
    Hong, B. Y.
    Lim, S. H.
    Kim, H. W.
    Ko, Y. J.
    Im, S. A.
    Lee, J. I.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2011, 19 (01) : 22 - 28
  • [37] Effects of a gluten challenge in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: a randomized single-blind controlled clinical trial
    Saadati, Saeede
    Sadeghi, Amir
    Mohaghegh-Shalmani, Hamid
    Rostami-Nejad, Mohammad
    Elli, Luca
    Asadzadeh-Aghdaei, Hamid
    Rodrigo, Luis
    Zali, Mohammad Reza
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [38] Comparison of Hyaluronate & Steroid Injection in the Treatment of Chronic Lateral Epicondylitis and Evaluation of Treatment Efficacy With MRI: A Single-Blind, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Study
    Yalcin, Atilla
    Kayaalp, M. Enes
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (09)
  • [39] Comparison Between Multimedia and Written Informed Consent for Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial
    Kim, Sunmin
    Kim, Nam Woo
    Nahm, Francis
    Choi, Eun Joo
    Lee, Pyung Bok
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2024, 27 (08)
  • [40] Comparison between TMJ arthrocentesis techniques with different needle positions: A randomized single-blind controlled clinical trial
    Grossmann, Eduardo
    Poluha, Rodrigo Lorenzi
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 49 (05) : 368 - 372