Biosimilar insulins: Narrative review of the regulatory framework and registration studies

被引:0
|
作者
Heise, Tim [1 ]
Devries, J. Hans [1 ]
机构
[1] Profil, Hellersbergstr 9, D-41460 Neuss, Germany
关键词
biosimilar insulin; insulin analogues; insulin therapy; pharmacodynamics; SUBCUTANEOUS INSULIN; GLARGINE LANTUS(R); CONTROLLED-TRIAL; EFFICACY; SAFETY; LISPRO; ANTIBODIES; PRODUCTS; GLULISINE; SAR342434;
D O I
10.1111/dom.16320
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Biosimilar insulins have been commercially available in the EU since 2014. Currently, six biosimilar insulins are approved in the EU and four in the US. However, commercial success has been limited, which may be in part due to concerns among physicians and people with diabetes that biosimilar insulins are substandard in efficacy, safety, and quality compared to reference products. Indeed, unlike generic drugs, which are identical chemical copies of their reference counterparts, in a biological manufacturing process, subtle differences can arise between products, even if the tertiary molecular structures are the same. Therefore, there is a clear regulatory pathway for the approval of biosimilars. For biosimilar insulins, preclinical (hormone receptor and cell) studies are needed to investigate potential differences in the response to biosimilar insulins and their reference medicinal products. In addition, there is a requirement for pivotal clinical pharmacology studies involving the euglycaemic glucose clamp technique to investigate comparative time-action profiles, whereas later-phase clinical safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity studies usually are no longer needed for the approval of biosimilar insulins. This narrative review provides an overview of pivotal phase 1 clamp and supportive larger phase 3 studies that supported the registration of biosimilar insulins in the EU and US, and discusses the need for interchangeability and immunogenicity studies. Overall, the current regulatory approach in the EU and in the USA ensures that there are no relevant differences between biosimilar insulins and their reference products. Therefore, people with diabetes and prescribers can use EU or US approved biosimilars without any concerns.Plain Language SummarySix biosimilar insulins are approved by the EU regulator, the European Medicines Agency, and are currently available on the EU market. Three biosimilar insulins are approved by the US regulator, the Food and Drugs Agency, and are currently available on the US market. However, commercial success has been limited, which may be in part due to concerns among physicians and people with diabetes that biosimilar insulins are perhaps not quite the same as the original products with respect to efficacy, safety, and quality. Such concerns could be valid, because unlike generic drugs, which are identical chemical copies of their reference counterparts, biosimilar protein biosimilar and originator drugs cannot be chemically identical. In a biological manufacturing process, subtle difference can and will arise between products, even if the tertiary molecular structures, that is the amino acid sequence, the interactions between different parts of the protein and the three-dimensional folding, are the same. To assure that these unavoidable subtle differences do not result in differences in efficacy, safety and quality, there is a clear regulatory pathway for the approval of biosimilars. In addition to chemical studies, preclinical studies are needed to investigate potential differences in the response to biosimilar insulins and their reference medicinal products. These include e.g. studies investigating affinity to the insulin receptor, and how the insulins induce their effect in cell models. Next, pivotal clinical pharmacology studies involving the euglycaemic glucose clamp technique to investigate comparative time action profiles are required. Later phase clinical safety, efficacy and immunogenicity studies usually are no longer needed for the approval of biosimilar insulins. This narrative review provides an overview of pivotal phase 1 clamp and supportive larger phase 3 studies which supported registration of biosimilar insulins in the EU and US, and discusses the need for interchangeability and immunogenicity studies. Overall, the current regulatory approach in the EU and in the USA ensures that there are no relevant differences between biosimilar insulins and their reference products. Therefore, people with diabetes and prescribers can use EU or US approved biosimilars without any concerns.Plain Language SummarySix biosimilar insulins are approved by the EU regulator, the European Medicines Agency, and are currently available on the EU market. Three biosimilar insulins are approved by the US regulator, the Food and Drugs Agency, and are currently available on the US market. However, commercial success has been limited, which may be in part due to concerns among physicians and people with diabetes that biosimilar insulins are perhaps not quite the same as the original products with respect to efficacy, safety, and quality. Such concerns could be valid, because unlike generic drugs, which are identical chemical copies of their reference counterparts, biosimilar protein biosimilar and originator drugs cannot be chemically identical. In a biological manufacturing process, subtle difference can and will arise between products, even if the tertiary molecular structures, that is the amino acid sequence, the interactions between different parts of the protein and the three-dimensional folding, are the same. To assure that these unavoidable subtle differences do not result in differences in efficacy, safety and quality, there is a clear regulatory pathway for the approval of biosimilars. In addition to chemical studies, preclinical studies are needed to investigate potential differences in the response to biosimilar insulins and their reference medicinal products. These include e.g. studies investigating affinity to the insulin receptor, and how the insulins induce their effect in cell models. Next, pivotal clinical pharmacology studies involving the euglycaemic glucose clamp technique to investigate comparative time action profiles are required. Later phase clinical safety, efficacy and immunogenicity studies usually are no longer needed for the approval of biosimilar insulins. This narrative review provides an overview of pivotal phase 1 clamp and supportive larger phase 3 studies which supported registration of biosimilar insulins in the EU and US, and discusses the need for interchangeability and immunogenicity studies. Overall, the current regulatory approach in the EU and in the USA ensures that there are no relevant differences between biosimilar insulins and their reference products. Therefore, people with diabetes and prescribers can use EU or US approved biosimilars without any concerns.Plain Language SummarySix biosimilar insulins are approved by the EU regulator, the European Medicines Agency, and are currently available on the EU market. Three biosimilar insulins are approved by the US regulator, the Food and Drugs Agency, and are currently available on the US market. However, commercial success has been limited, which may be in part due to concerns among physicians and people with diabetes that biosimilar insulins are perhaps not quite the same as the original products with respect to efficacy, safety, and quality. Such concerns could be valid, because unlike generic drugs, which are identical chemical copies of their reference counterparts, biosimilar protein biosimilar and originator drugs cannot be chemically identical. In a biological manufacturing process, subtle difference can and will arise between products, even if the tertiary molecular structures, that is the amino acid sequence, the interactions between different parts of the protein and the three-dimensional folding, are the same. To assure that these unavoidable subtle differences do not result in differences in efficacy, safety and quality, there is a clear regulatory pathway for the approval of biosimilars. In addition to chemical studies, preclinical studies are needed to investigate potential differences in the response to biosimilar insulins and their reference medicinal products. These include e.g. studies investigating affinity to the insulin receptor, and how the insulins induce their effect in cell models. Next, pivotal clinical pharmacology studies involving the euglycaemic glucose clamp technique to investigate comparative time action profiles are required. Later phase clinical safety, efficacy and immunogenicity studies usually are no longer needed for the approval of biosimilar insulins. This narrative review provides an overview of pivotal phase 1 clamp and supportive larger phase 3 studies which supported registration of biosimilar insulins in the EU and US, and discusses the need for interchangeability and immunogenicity studies. Overall, the current regulatory approach in the EU and in the USA ensures that there are no relevant differences between biosimilar insulins and their reference products. Therefore, people with diabetes and prescribers can use EU or US approved biosimilars without any concerns.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Pediatric joint hypermobility: a diagnostic framework and narrative review
    Louise Jane Tofts
    Jane Simmonds
    Sarah B. Schwartz
    Roberto M. Richheimer
    Constance O’Connor
    Ellen Elias
    Raoul Engelbert
    Katie Cleary
    Brad T. Tinkle
    Antonie D. Kline
    Alan J. Hakim
    Marion A. J. van Rossum
    Verity Pacey
    Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 18
  • [32] Ethical and regulatory challenges of AI technologies in healthcare: A narrative review
    Mennella, Ciro
    Maniscalco, Umberto
    De Pietro, Giuseppe
    Esposito, Massimo
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (04)
  • [33] Mitochondrial regulatory mechanisms in spinal cord injury: A narrative review
    Liu, Chengjiang
    Liu, Yidong
    Ma, Boyuan
    Zhou, Mengmeng
    Zhao, Xinyan
    Fu, Xuanhao
    Kan, Shunli
    Hu, Wei
    Zhu, Rusen
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (46) : E31930
  • [34] Healthy Schools Framework in Saudi Arabia: A Narrative Review
    AlZahrani, Saeed Ghurmallah
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND ALLIED SCIENCES, 2023, 12 (01): : 110 - 115
  • [35] Communicating Uncertainty: a Narrative Review and Framework for Future Research
    Simpkin, Arabella L.
    Armstrong, Katrina A.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2019, 34 (11) : 2586 - 2591
  • [36] Efficacy and regulatory strategies of gut microbiota in immunotherapy: a narrative review
    Sang, Yaodong
    Zheng, Kexin
    Zhao, Yulong
    Liu, Yuan
    Zhu, Siqiang
    Xie, Xiaozhou
    Shang, Liang
    Liu, Jin
    Li, Leping
    TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2024, 13 (04) : 2043 - 2063
  • [37] Pediatric joint hypermobility: a diagnostic framework and narrative review
    Tofts, Louise Jane
    Simmonds, Jane
    Schwartz, Sarah B.
    Richheimer, Roberto M.
    O'Connor, Constance
    Elias, Ellen
    Engelbert, Raoul
    Cleary, Katie
    Tinkle, Brad T.
    Kline, Antonie D.
    Hakim, Alan J.
    van Rossum, Marion A. J.
    Pacey, Verity
    ORPHANET JOURNAL OF RARE DISEASES, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [38] Communicating Uncertainty: a Narrative Review and Framework for Future Research
    Arabella L. Simpkin
    Katrina A. Armstrong
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2019, 34 : 2586 - 2591
  • [39] A management framework for left sided endocarditis: a narrative review
    Nappi, Francesco
    Spadaccio, Cristiano
    Moon, Marc R.
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2020, 8 (23)
  • [40] Studies of Vision in Cricket-A Narrative Review
    Fogt, Jennifer Swingle
    Fogt, Nick
    VISION, 2023, 7 (03)