Enhancing the Valuation of Cultural Ecosystem Services Provided by Coastal Beaches Through Economic and Biophysical Methods

被引:0
|
作者
Oh, Chi-Ok [1 ]
Kim, Namhee [2 ]
Kang, Yoonja [3 ]
机构
[1] Chonnam Natl Univ, Grad Sch Culture, Gwangju 61186, South Korea
[2] Chonnam Natl Univ, Cultural Convergence Res Inst, Gwangju 61186, South Korea
[3] Chonnam Natl Univ, Dept Ocean Integrated Sci, Yeosu 59626, South Korea
关键词
cultural ecosystem services; non-market valuation; stated preference methods; choice experiments; energy method; coastal beaches; MARINE; PREFERENCES; BIODIVERSITY;
D O I
10.3390/land14020280
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study evaluates cultural ecosystem services (CESs) provided by coastal beaches in Korea using two valuation methods: choice experiments (CEs) and the energy method (EM). CESs, which include non-material benefits like recreation and esthetic enjoyment, are difficult to quantify through traditional market-based approaches. The CE method estimates individuals' willingness to pay (WTP), offering an economic valuation, while the EM calculates the energy inputs required to sustain CESs, providing a biophysical perspective. The study compares CES values from both methods across 266 beaches in Korea. CES values from the CE method ranged from 6 million Korean won (KRW) (USD 5400) to KRW 93 billion (USD 84 million), while the EM yielded values between KRW 40 million (USD 36,000) and KRW 112 billion (USD 101 million). The EM generally yields higher valuations, particularly for rural beaches with fewer visitors, where ecological contributions dominate. In contrast, the CE values are closely aligned with the EM results for urban beaches, where human preferences and ecological inputs converge. These findings highlight the value of integrating economic and biophysical perspectives to provide policymakers with comprehensive data for balancing economic development and ecological conservation in coastal management. By adopting a dual-method approach, this research provides policymakers with concrete insights into optimizing resource allocation, prioritizing conservation efforts for less-visited rural beaches, and supporting sustainable coastal development tailored to regional characteristics.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Review of valuation methods for mangrove ecosystem services
    Quoc Tuan Vo
    Kuenzer, C.
    Quang Minh Vo
    Moder, F.
    Oppelt, N.
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2012, 23 : 431 - 446
  • [32] Loss of coastal ecosystem services in Mexico: An approach to economic valuation in the face of sea level rise
    Fernandez-Diaz, Violeta Z.
    Turriza, Roman A. Canul
    Castilla, Angel Kuc
    Hinojosa-Huerta, Osvel
    FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2022, 9
  • [33] How and to what extent is ecosystem services economic valuation used in coastal and marine management in China?
    Li, Jing-Mei
    Wang, Na
    MARINE POLICY, 2022, 138
  • [34] Integrating marine ecosystem conservation and ecosystems services economic valuation: Implications for coastal zones governance
    Ferreira, Ana Margarida
    Marques, Joao Carlos
    Seixas, Sonia
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2017, 77 : 114 - 122
  • [35] Valuation of the ecosystem services: A psycho-cultural perspective
    Kumar, Manasi
    Kumar, Pushpam
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 64 (04) : 808 - 819
  • [36] Integration of biophysical connectivity in the spatial optimization of coastal ecosystem services
    Ospina-Alvarez, Andres
    de Juan, Silvia
    Davis, Katrina J.
    Gonzalez, Catherine
    Fernandez, Miriam
    Navarrete, Sergio A.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 733
  • [37] Integrating Cultural Ecosystem Services valuation into coastal wetlands restoration: A case study from South Australia
    Clarke, Beverley
    Thet, Aung Ko
    Sandhu, Harpinder
    Dittmann, Sabine
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2021, 116 : 220 - 229
  • [38] Economic valuation of aquatic ecosystem services in developing countries
    Korsgaard, Louise
    Schou, Jesper S.
    WATER POLICY, 2010, 12 (01) : 20 - 31
  • [39] Evaluating alternative methods for biophysical and cultural ecosystem services hotspot mapping in natural resource planning
    Kenneth J. Bagstad
    Darius J. Semmens
    Zachary H. Ancona
    Benson C. Sherrouse
    Landscape Ecology, 2017, 32 : 77 - 97
  • [40] Evaluating alternative methods for biophysical and cultural ecosystem services hotspot mapping in natural resource planning
    Bagstad, Kenneth J.
    Semmens, Darius J.
    Ancona, Zachary H.
    Sherrouse, Benson C.
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2017, 32 (01) : 77 - 97