The effect of single-layer and double-layer graft usage in tympanoplasty on hearing and graft success

被引:0
|
作者
Kara, Zuelal [1 ]
Genc, Selahattin [2 ]
Ozel, Halil Erdem [2 ]
Ozdogan, Fatih [2 ]
Caliskan, Sebla [2 ]
机构
[1] Gaziantep City Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Gaziantep, Turkiye
[2] Kocaeli City Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Kocaeli, Turkiye
关键词
Double layer graft; Graft success; Hearing gain; Tympanoplasty; Young's modulus; CARTILAGE TYMPANOPLASTY; FASCIA;
D O I
10.1007/s00405-024-09117-7
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
ObjectivesIn this study, we investigated whether the use of double layer graft (DLG) in tympanoplasty would increase grafting success rates (GSR) and whether increased graft thickness would negatively affect hearing.MethodsThe study group consisted of patients with DLG and the control group consisted of patients with single layer graft (SLG). The results of 195 patients in terms of hearing achievement and 211 patients in terms of GSR were compared.ResultsHearing and GSR were analyzed in 103 DLG and 108 SLG patients. Postoperative 6th month air conduction pure tone averages were 25.34 (+/- 14.99) dB in DLG group and 20.50 (+/- 8.82) dB in SLG group. These values were statistically significantly higher in the DLG group (p=0.005). Postoperative air bone gap was 11.40 (+/- 8.61) dB in DLG and 12.95 (+/- 10.88) dB in SLG and there was no statistically significant difference in hearing gain between the groups. GSR was 99/103 (96.1%) in the DLG group and 103/108 (95.4%) in the SLG group with no difference between the groups (p=0.679)ConclusionWe concluded that DLG is not superior to SLG in terms of both hearing and GSR, and may even be disadvantageous in terms of hearing, and this should be taken into consideration in patient selection.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Systematic Review of Single-Layer Versus Double-Layer Intestinal Anastomosis: Is One Better?
    Winston, David E. M.
    Pina, Nancy
    Kasprzycki, Tomasz
    Gul-Muhammad, Marium
    Joyner, Robert
    Kowdley, Gopal C.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 302 : 606 - 610
  • [22] Nitinol double-layer stent versus closed single-layer stent: a systematic review
    Silvinato, Antonio
    Floriano, Idevaldo
    Bernardo, Wanderley
    REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2022, 68 (11): : 1490 - 1495
  • [23] Single-layer versus double-layer closure of facial lacerations: A randomized controlled trial
    Singer, AJ
    Gulla, J
    Hein, M
    Marchini, S
    Chale, S
    Arora, BP
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2005, 116 (02) : 363 - 368
  • [25] Investigation on Flow and Heat Transfer Characteristics in Single-Layer Channel and Double-Layer Channels
    Wang, Zhuo
    Xia, Guo-Dong
    Ma, Dan-Dan
    Yang, Yu-Chen
    Kung Cheng Je Wu Li Hsueh Pao/Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2019, 40 (05): : 1126 - 1130
  • [26] Single-Layer or Double-Layer Intestinal Anastomosis: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Okafor, Donatus K.
    Katyal, Gitika
    Kaur, Gursharan
    Ashraf, Hafsa
    Bodapati, Adi Prasad
    Hanif, Ayesha
    Khan, Safeera
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (10)
  • [27] CHARGE-TRANSFER AT DOUBLE-LAYER TO SINGLE-LAYER TRANSITION IN DOUBLE-QUANTUM-WELL SYSTEMS
    KATAYAMA, Y
    TSUI, DC
    MANOHARAN, HC
    PARIHAR, S
    SHAYEGAN, M
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 1995, 52 (20): : 14817 - 14824
  • [28] Is it taboo to elevate the tympanomeatal flap? Outcomes of endoscopic transcanal type 1 cartilage tympanoplasty with double-layer crescent graft technique
    Aslan, Mehmet
    Cicek, Mehmet Turan
    Tan, Mehmet
    Yalcin, Muhammed Zeki
    B-ENT, 2021, 17 (02): : 63 - 69
  • [29] Effect of nitrous oxide to graft success after tympanoplasty
    Ocalan, Ramazan
    Disli, Zeliha Korkmaz
    Sapmaz, Emrah
    Tokgoz, Necla
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF BAKIRKOY, 2015, 11 (01) : 5 - 8
  • [30] Density functional study of Li/Na adsorption properties of single-layer and double-layer antimonenes
    Wei, Huilan
    Sun, Jianping
    Hu, Yifan
    Li, Zhao
    Ai, Mei
    RSC ADVANCES, 2019, 9 (56) : 32608 - 32619