Predicting intermediate-risk prostate cancer using machine learning

被引:0
|
作者
Stojadinovic, Miroslav [1 ]
Stojadinovic, Milorad [2 ]
Jankovic, Slobodan [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kragujevac, Fac Med Sci, Svetozara Markov 69, Kragujevac 34000, Serbia
[2] Univ Clin Ctr Serbia, Clin Nephrol, Belgrade, Serbia
[3] Univ Kragujevac, Fac Med Sci, Pharmacol & Toxicol Dept, Kragujevac, Serbia
关键词
Prostate cancer; Prostate biopsy; Diagnosis; Machine learning; Intermediate-risk; RADIATION-THERAPY; STRATIFICATION; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s11255-024-04342-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
PurposesIntermediate-risk prostate cancer (IR PCa) is the most common risk group for localized prostate cancer. This study aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) model that utilizes biopsy predictors to estimate the probability of IR PCa and assess its performance compared to the traditional clinical model.MethodsBetween January 2017 and December 2022, patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values of <= 20 ng/mL underwent transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsies. Patient's age, PSA, digital rectal exam, prostate volume, PSA density (PSAD), and previous negative biopsy, number of positive cores, Gleason score, and biopsy outcome were recorded. Patients are categorized into no cancer, very low, low-, and intermediate-risk categories. The relationship between the model and IR PCa was investigated using binary generalized linear model (GLM) and assessed its discriminatory ability by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).ResultsAmong 729 patients, PCa was detected in 234 individuals (32.1%), with 120 (16.5%) diagnosed with IR PCa. The AUC for the novel model compared to the clinical model was 0.806 (95% CI: 0.722-0.889) versus 0.669 (95% CI: 0.543-0.790), with a p-value of 0.018. In DCA, the GLM outperformed the clinical model by over 7%, potentially allowing for an additional 44.3% reduction in unnecessary biopsies. The PSAD emerged as the most significant predictor.ConclusionWe developed a GLM utilizing pre-biopsy features to predict IR PCa. The model demonstrated good discrimination and clinical applicability, which could assist urologists in determining the necessity of a prostate biopsy.
引用
收藏
页码:1737 / 1746
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Importance of prostate volume in the stratification of patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer
    Moschini, Marco
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Suardi, Nazareno
    Fossati, Nicola
    Cucchiara, Vito
    Damiano, Rocco
    Cantiello, Francesco
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Briganti, Alberto
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 22 (06) : 555 - 561
  • [22] Prognostic Value of the Intermediate-risk Feature in Men with Favorable Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer: Implications for Active Surveillance
    Sherer, Michael, V
    Leonard, Austin J.
    Nelson, Tyler J.
    Guram, Kripa
    De Moraes, Gustavo Rodrigues
    Javier-Desloges, Juan
    Kane, Christopher
    McKay, Rana R.
    Rose, Brent S.
    Bagrodia, Aditya
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2023, 50 : 61 - 67
  • [23] INTERMEDIATE-RISK PROSTATE CANCER, ANDROGEN DEPRIVATION THERAPY AND THE RISK OF DEATH
    Pickles, Tom
    Tyldesley, Scott
    Keyes, Mira
    Morris, W. James
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 120 : S27 - S27
  • [24] Brachytherapy for Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer, Androgen Deprivation, and the Risk of Death
    Pickles, Tom
    Tyldesley, Scott
    Hamm, Jeremy
    Virani, Sean A.
    Morris, W. James
    Keyes, Mira
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 100 (01): : 45 - 52
  • [25] MACHINE LEARNING FOR PREDICTING HEMODYNAMIC DETERIORATION OF PATIENTS WITH INTERMEDIATE-RISK PULMONARY EMBOLISM IN INTENSIVE CARE UNIT
    Xu, Jiatang
    Hu, Zhensheng
    Miao, Jianhang
    Cao, Lin
    Tian, Zhenluan
    Yao, Chen
    Kai, Huang
    SHOCK, 2024, 61 (01): : 68 - 75
  • [26] Is active surveillance safe for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer?
    Chung, Hoseok
    Shin, Bo Sung
    Nam, Deok-Hyun
    Chung, Hoseok
    Kim, Myung Ki
    Jung, Seung Il
    Kang, Taek Won
    Kwon, Dong Deuk
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 116 : 4 - 4
  • [27] Active surveillance for intermediate-risk prostate cancer: yes, but for whom?
    Overland, Maya R.
    Washington, Samuel L., III
    Carroll, Peter R.
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Herlemann, Annika
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2019, 29 (06) : 605 - 611
  • [28] Is there a need for supplemental XRT in intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients?
    Stone, Nelson N.
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2013, 12 (05) : 393 - 397
  • [29] Insignificant disease among men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer
    Hong, Sung Kyu
    Vertosick, Emily
    Sjoberg, Daniel D.
    Scardino, Peter T.
    Eastham, James A.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 32 (06) : 1417 - 1421
  • [30] Outcomes for Men with Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance
    Courtney, P. T.
    Deka, R.
    Cherry, D. R.
    Nelson, T. J.
    Luterstein, E.
    Salans, M. A.
    Yip, A. T. T.
    Nalawade, V.
    Parsons, J. K.
    Kader, K.
    Stewart, T. F.
    Rose, B. S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 108 (03): : S121 - S122