Analysis of Initial Outcomes of Gas-insufflation One-step Single-port Transaxillary (GOSTA) Robotic Thyroidectomy for Thyroid Cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Na, Yong Min [1 ,2 ]
Park, Sang Chun [1 ,2 ]
An, Sang Yun [1 ,2 ]
Ma, Hye Un [1 ,2 ]
Kwon, Yong Bin [1 ,2 ]
Ryu, Young Jae [1 ,2 ]
Cho, Jin Seong [3 ,4 ]
Park, Min Ho [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chonnam Natl Univ, Med Sch, Dept Surg, Hwasun, South Korea
[2] Chonnam Natl Univ, Hwasun Hosp, Hwasun, South Korea
[3] Chonnam Natl Univ, Med Sch, Dept Surg, Gwangju, South Korea
[4] Chonnam Natl Univ Hosp, Gwangju, South Korea
关键词
Comparative analysis; postoperative outcomes; roboticthyroidectomy; thyroid papillary carcinoma; transaxillary thyroidectomy; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.21873/anticanres.17288
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background/Aim: This study compared the initialoutcomes of gas-insufflation one-step single-port transaxillary(GOSTA) robotic thyroidectomy with traditional openthyroidectomy for thyroid cancer at a single institution.Patients and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conductedon 77 patients who underwent thyroidectomy for differentiatedthyroid cancer from January to June 2024. Exclusion criteriaincluded benign nodules, Graves' disease, and previous thyroidsurgeries. Two surgeons performed the procedures, with onehaving no prior robotic surgery experience. Results: Of the 77patients, 48 underwent open thyroidectomy and 29 underwentGOSTA thyroidectomy. The GOSTA group had a significantlylower mean age (40.1 vs. 47.6 years, p=0.002) and a higherproportion of female patients (p=0.040). The open grouppatients had more harvested lymph nodes than the GOSTAgroup patients (7.9 vs. 2.4, p<0.001). The GOSTA grouppatients had longer operation time (156.4 vs. 80.6 min,p<0.001), and had extended hospital stay than the open grouppatients (5.9 vs. 3.4 days, p<0.001). Complication rates weresimilar between the groups. Conclusion: GOSTA roboticthyroidectomy provides comparable safety and effectiveness toopen thyroidectomy, with improved cosmetic outcomes despitelonger operation times and hospital stays. This technique isfeasible for surgeons without prior robotic experience, offeringa viable alternative for patients prioritizing cosmetic results
引用
收藏
页码:4585 / 4592
页数:8
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [11] Single-port versus multiport robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: initial experiences by case-matched analysis of short-term outcomes
    Jeong, Min Hye
    Kim, Hye Jin
    Choi, Gyu-Seog
    Song, Seung Ho
    Park, Jun Seok
    Park, Soo Yeun
    Lee, Sung Min
    Na, Dong Hee
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT AND RESEARCH, 2023, 102 (05) : 99 - 106
  • [12] Single-port plus one in pediatric robotic-assisted Lich-Gregoir ureteral reimplantation for vesicoureteral reflux, a comparative analysis with short-term outcomes
    Chen, Jianglong
    Kang, Yingquan
    Lin, Shan
    He, Shaohua
    He, Yufeng
    Xu, Xinru
    Xu, Huihuang
    You, Guangxu
    Xu, Di
    BMC UROLOGY, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [13] Single-port plus one in pediatric robotic-assisted Lich-Gregoir ureteral reimplantation for vesicoureteral reflux, a comparative analysis with short-term outcomes
    Jianglong Chen
    Yingquan Kang
    Shan Lin
    Shaohua He
    Yufeng He
    Xinru Xu
    Huihuang Xu
    Guangxu You
    Di Xu
    BMC Urology, 24
  • [14] Transaxillary Single-Port Endoscopic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Implant-based Breast Reconstruction in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy or Not: A Comparative Study with Analysis of Surgical Complications and Patient-Reported Outcomes
    Zhao, Jingjing
    Chen, Zujin
    Wang, Mengdie
    Hai, Linyue
    Xiao, Chunhua
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2023, 47 (06) : 2304 - 2321
  • [15] Transaxillary Single-Port Endoscopic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Implant-based Breast Reconstruction in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy or Not: A Comparative Study with Analysis of Surgical Complications and Patient-Reported Outcomes
    Jingjing Zhao
    Zujin Chen
    Mengdie Wang
    Linyue Hai
    Chunhua Xiao
    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2023, 47 : 2304 - 2321