ProCUSNet: Prostate Cancer Detection on B-mode Transrectal Ultrasound Using Artificial Intell igence for Targeting During Prostate Biopsies

被引:0
|
作者
Rusu, Mirabela [1 ,2 ,8 ]
Jahanandish, Hassan [1 ,2 ]
Vesal, Sulaiman [1 ,2 ]
Li, Cynthia Xinran [3 ]
Bhattacharya, Indrani [1 ]
Venkataraman, Rajesh [4 ]
Zhou, Steve Ran [2 ]
Kornberg, Zachary [2 ]
Sommer, Elijah Richard [5 ]
Khandwala, Yash Samir [2 ]
Hockman, Luke [2 ]
Zhou, Zhien [6 ]
Choi, Moon Hyung [7 ]
Ghanouni, Pejman [1 ]
Fan, Richard E. [2 ]
Sonn, Geoffrey A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Radiol, Stanford, CA USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Urol, Stanford, CA USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Inst Computat & Math Engn, Stanford, CA USA
[4] Eigen Hlth Serv Llc, Grass Valley, CA USA
[5] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Stanford, CA USA
[6] Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
[7] Catholic Univ Korea, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[8] Stanford Univ, Dept Biomed Data Sci, 300 Pasteur, Stanford, CA USA
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY | 2025年 / 8卷 / 02期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Artificial intelligence; B-mode transrectal ultrasound; Prostate cancer; ProCUSNet; NEURAL-NETWORK; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.euo.2024.12.012
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and objective: To assess whether conventional brightness-mode (B-mode) transrectal ultrasound images of the prostate reveal clinically significant cancers with the help of artificial intelligence methods. Methods: This study included 2986 men who underwent biopsies at two institutions. We trained the PROstate Cancer detection on B-mode transrectal UltraSound images NETwork (ProCUSNet) to determine whether ultrasound can reliably detect cancer. Specifically, ProCUSNet is based on the well-established nnUNet frameworks, and seeks to detect and outline clinically significant cancer on three-dimensional (3D) examinations reconstructed from 2D screen captures. We compared ProCUSNet against (1) reference labels (n = 515 patients), (2) eight readers that interpreted B-mode ultrasound (n = 20-80 patients), and (3) radiologists interpreting magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for clinical care (n = 110 radical prostatectomy patients). Key findings and limitations: ProCUSNet found 82% clinically significant cancer cases with a lesion boundary error of up to 2.67 mm and detected 42% more lesions than ultrasound readers (sensitivity: 0.86 vs 0.44, p < 0.05, Wilcoxon test, Bonferroni correction). Furthermore, ProCUSNet has similar performance to radiologists interpreting MRI when accounting for registration errors (sensitivity: 0.79 vs 0.78, p > 0.05, Wilcoxon test, Bonferroni correction), while having the same targeting utility as a supplement to systematic biopsies. Conclusions and clinical implications: ProCUSNet can localize clinically significant cancer on screen capture B-mode ultrasound, a task that is particularly challenging for clinicians reading these examinations. As a supplement to systematic biopsies, ProCUSNet appears comparable with MRI, suggesting its utility for targeting suspicious lesions during the biopsy and possibly for screening using ultrasound alone, in the absence of MRI.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 485
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [42] Prostate cancer detection with transrectal in-bore MRI biopsies: impact of prostate volume and lesion features
    Schaudinn, Alexander
    Busse, Harald
    Ehrengut, Constantin
    Linder, Nicolas
    Ludwig, Jonna
    Franz, Toni
    Horn, Lars-Christian
    Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe
    Denecke, Timm
    INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2025, 16 (01):
  • [43] PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION AND COMPLICATIONS OF TRANSPERINEAL VERSUS TRANSRECTAL MRI-FUSION GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSIES
    Buller, Dylan
    Sahl, Jessa
    Staff, Ilene
    Tortora, Joseph
    Pinto, Kevin
    McLaughlin, Tara
    Valintin, Laura Olivo
    Wagner, Joseph
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E137 - E137
  • [44] The Influence of Ultrasound Probe Orientation on Prostate Cancer Detection Rate During Transrectal Ultrasonography-Guided Prostate Biopsy
    Mortimer, Alex Mark
    Ridley, Nick
    Cook, John-Luke
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 (12) : 2075 - 2081
  • [45] Current Approach to Complications and Difficulties during Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsies
    Osama, Salloum
    Serboiu, Crenguta
    Taciuc, Iulian-Alexandru
    Angelescu, Emil
    Petcu, Costin
    Priporeanu, Tiberiu Alexandru
    Marinescu, Andreea
    Costache, Adrian
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (02)
  • [46] Results of transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies and clinical significance of Japanese prostate cancer
    Egawa, S
    Matsumoto, K
    Yoshida, K
    Iwamura, M
    Kuwao, S
    Koshiba, K
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 28 (11) : 666 - 672
  • [47] Can transrectal prostate ultrasound compete with multiparametric MRI in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer?
    Grey, Alistair D. R.
    Connor, Martin J.
    Tam, Joseph
    Loch, Tillmann
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2020, 9 (03) : 1492 - 1500
  • [48] MRI vs Transrectal Ultrasound to Estimate Prostate Volume and PSAD : Impact on Prostate Cancer Detection
    Choe, Shawn
    Patel, Hiten D.
    Lanzotti, Nicholas
    Okabe, Yudai
    Rac, Goran
    Shea, Steven M.
    Gorbonos, Alex
    Quek, Marcus L.
    Flanigan, Robert C.
    Goldberg, Ari
    Gupta, Gopal N.
    UROLOGY, 2023, 171 : 172 - 178
  • [49] Pubic arch detection in transrectal ultrasound guided prostate cancer therapy
    Pathak, SD
    Grimm, PD
    Chalana, V
    Kim, Y
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1998, 17 (05) : 762 - 771
  • [50] Effect of lesion diameter and prostate volume on prostate cancer detection rate of magnetic resonance imaging: Transrectal-ultrasonography-guided fusion biopsies using cognitive targeting
    Ozden, Eriz
    Akpinar, Cagri
    Ibis, Arif
    Kubilay, Eralp
    Erden, Ayse
    Yaman, Onder
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 47 (01): : 22 - 29