Efficacy of Ropivacaine alone Versus Ropivacaine with Dexmedetomidine in Ultrasound-guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: A Randomised Controlled Study

被引:0
|
作者
Gowthami, Jampala [1 ]
Sunilkumar, Nadikuda [1 ]
Isaac, G. anand [1 ]
Kumar, T. kiran [1 ]
机构
[1] Osmania Med Coll & Gen Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol & Crit Care Med, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
关键词
Adjuvants; Analgesia; Upper limb; BUPIVACAINE; 0.5-PERCENT;
D O I
10.7860/JCDR/2025/77638.20703
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: The Supraclavicular Brachial (SCB) plexus block for upper limb surgeries has emerged as a rapid and reliable technique compared to general anaesthesia. With the advent of Ultrasound (US), the SCB plexus block has become an easy, accurate and popular procedure to perform. Dexmedetomidine, as an adjuvant to local anaesthetics, has improved the quality of the blocks. Aim: To compare the onset and duration of sensory and motor blockade of 0.5% ropivacaine versus 0.5% ropivacaine with 25 mu g dexmedetomidine, as well as to assess the haemodynamic parameters in the SCB plexus block. Materials and Methods: This randomised controlled study was conducted at Osmania Medical College and General Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India which included 60 adult patients {American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) Iand II} scheduled for elective upper limb surgery under SCB, according to the inclusion criteria. The patients were randomised into group R (n=30), which received 30 mL of ropivacaine with 1 mL of saline and group RD (n=30), which received 30 mL of ropivacaine with 25 mu g of dexmedetomidine. The onset and duration of sensory and motor block, the duration of analgesia, haemodynamic parameters and any complications were recorded, tabulated in an Excel sheet and analysed using an unpaired t-test. Results: The demographic data among both groups were comparable, with a male predominance. The onset of sensory and motor block was faster in group RD compared to group R, respectively (4.78 +/- 1.68 mins vs. 7.87 +/- 1.98 mins, p-value <0.001) and (8.4 +/- 2.34 mins vs. 12.3 +/- 2.95 mins, p-value <0.001). The duration of sensory and motor block was longer in group RD compared to group R, respectively (807.5 +/- 165.51 mins vs. 485 +/- 81.31 mins, p-value <0.001) and (685 +/- 62.74 mins vs. 465 +/- 72.62 mins, p-value <0.001). Haemodynamic stability was well maintained without any complications in group RD. Conclusion: The addition of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine in ultrasound-guided SCB accelerates the onset of sensory and motor block, prolongs the duration of the block and analgesia, thereby improving the quality of the SCB.
引用
收藏
页码:UC10 / UC13
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of morphine, dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone as an adjuvant to ropivacaine in ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block for postoperative analgesia-a randomized controlled trial
    Venkatraman, Rajagopalan
    Pushparani, Anand
    Karthik, Krishnamoorthy
    Nandhini, Prabuvel
    JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 37 (01) : 102 - 107
  • [22] Analgesic and safety analysis of dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine in ultrasound-guided brachial plexus nerve block
    Lu, Jiayu
    Cui, Taihao
    Yu, Zhaoxiang
    Zheng, Wei
    He, Wei
    TROPICAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2023, 22 (09) : 1921 - 1927
  • [23] A COMPARISON OF PERINEURAL DEXMEDETOMIDINE IN 0.75% ROPIVACAINE BETWEEN ULTRASOUND-GUIDED SUPRACLAVICULAR AND INFRACLAVICULAR BRACHIAL PLEXUS BLOCK FOR UPPER LIMB SURGERY
    Hassan, W. M. N. W.
    Sani, M. F. Mat
    Zaini, R. H. Mohd
    Shukeri, W. F. Wan Mohd
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2016, 123 : 653 - 653
  • [24] Dexmedetomidine added to ropivacaine prolongs the duration of supraclavicular brachial plexus block
    Yoo, Ji Young
    Lee, Ae Ryoung
    Shin, Young Hee
    Choi, Soo Joo
    Choi, Duck Hwan
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2012, 108 : 405 - 406
  • [25] Comparison of clonidine and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants for ropivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block
    Nazir, Ovais
    Bhat, Asif Hussain
    Sharma, Tarun
    Khatuja, Amit
    Misra, Rajesh
    SRI LANKAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2019, 27 (01): : 53 - 58
  • [26] The minimum effective concentration (MEC90) of ropivacaine for ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block
    Fang, G.
    Wan, L.
    Mei, W.
    Yu, H. H.
    Luo, A. L.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 71 (06) : 700 - 705
  • [27] Application of Hydromorphone and Ropivacaine in Ultrasound-Guided Brachial Plexus Block of Children
    Lin, Hui
    Nie, Liang
    JOURNAL OF PERIANESTHESIA NURSING, 2022, 37 (05) : 662 - 668
  • [28] A prospective randomized study to compare levobupivacaine and ropivacaine in ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block for forearm orthopedic surgery
    Shahid, Razi
    Prasad, Mukesh Kumar
    Alam, Md Alauddin
    Jain, Payal
    Reddy, Macha Niranjan
    Jheetay, Gurdeep Singh
    ANAESTHESIA PAIN & INTENSIVE CARE, 2021, 25 (05) : 613 - 619
  • [29] A Randomized Controlled Study of 0.5% Bupivacaine, 0.5% Ropivacaine and 0.75% Ropivacaine for Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block
    Venkatesh, Ranjan R.
    Kumar, Prabhat
    Trissur, Ramachandran R.
    George, Sagiev Koshy
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2016, 10 (12) : UC9 - UC12
  • [30] COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF FENTANYL AND DEXMEDETOMIDINE IN SUPRACLAVICULAR BRACHIAL PLEXUS BLOCK ACHIEVED WITH ROPIVACAINE
    Cham, Soma C.
    Sangawar, Medha A.
    Ramtani, Umesh L.
    Chavan, Bhupendra S.
    Cham, Chandrashekharan
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2015, 4 (54): : 9427 - 9436