Bioequivalence study of fluticasone propionate nebuliser suspensions in healthy Chinese subjects

被引:0
|
作者
Cheng, Feng [1 ]
Shen, Tao [2 ]
Zhang, Fucheng [1 ]
Lei, Chenghao [1 ]
Zhu, Ye [1 ]
Luo, Guojun [2 ]
Xiao, Dawei [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Gaoxin Hosp, Phase Clin Trial Site 1, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Chenpon Pharmaceut Co Ltd, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
bioequivalence; safety; fluticasone propionate; asthma; healthy Chinese subjects; GLOBAL BURDEN; PHARMACOKINETICS; ASTHMA; VOLUNTEERS; MANAGEMENT; CHILDREN; ADULTS;
D O I
10.3389/fphar.2024.1452596
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background Fluticasone propionate is a synthetic trifluoro-substituted glucocorticoid, a highly selective glucocorticoid receptor agonist. Fluticasone propionate nebuliser suspensions is an inhaled corticosteroid with the low systemic bioavailability which provides a low risk (benefit outcome without the adverse effects that accompany systemically administered corticosteroids), referred as a first-line preventive agent for patients with persistent asthma. China has become one of the countries with the highest asthma mortality rate in the world in the past years. It urgently needs good generic drugs to help ease patients' burden and improve their quality of life.Objective The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of fluticasone propionate nebuliser suspensions between test formulation (generic product) and reference formulation (original product, Flixotide Nebules (R)) with the pharmacokinetic parameters as the endpoint indicators and the secondary objective was to evaluate the safety of two inhalated fluticasone propionate nebuliser suspensions under the condition of fasting in healthy Chinese subjects.Methods The bioequivalence study was conducted with a single-center, randomized, open-label, single-dose, two sequences, two-period crossover design. 24 healthy subjects were randomly assigned into T-R and R-T sequence groups with 12 patients in each group. The subjects were administered 1 mg (2 mL:0.5 mg,plastic ampoules) of generic fluticasone propionate nebuliser suspension as a test formulation or Flixotide Nebules (R) as reference formulation and cross administration after sufficient washout period (5 days) for the second period study. The blood sample was collected at predetermined time points up to 48 h and the plasma concentration of fluticasone propionate was determined by HPLC-MS/MS in healthy subjects after inhalation of test or reference formulation. The non-compartment model method (NCA module) of the WinNonlin (R) software (version 8.3) was used to calculate the pharmacokinetic parameters (Cmax, AUC0-t, AUC0-infinity) between the test formulation and the reference formulation were within the predefined range of 80.00% and 125.00%, bioequivalence of both formulations was demonstrated.Results The 90% confidence intervals of the T/R ratio of the geometric mean of Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-infinity for both formulations were 90.24%-112.68%, 96.99%-112.27% and 96.41%-111.59% respectively, which were all within the bioequivalent range of 80%-125%. No severe, suspicious or unexpected serious adverse reactions were reported.Conclusion The test and reference formulations of fluticasone propionate nebuliser suspension were pharmacokinetic bioequivalent and were well tolerated and safe in all subjects.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Bioequivalence Study of Tebipenem Pivoxil in Healthy Chinese Adults
    Hao, Rui
    Shao, Yiming
    Lin, Sisi
    Wu, Yi
    Bian, Li
    Zhang, Yiwen
    DRUGS IN R&D, 2024, 24 (01) : 89 - 96
  • [42] Study on the pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of etodolac in Chinese healthy volunteers
    Jiang, Min
    Zhang, Hong
    Xiong, Yu-qing
    Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal, 2002, 37 (08) : 608 - 611
  • [43] Bioequivalence Study of Tebipenem Pivoxil in Healthy Chinese Adults
    Rui Hao
    Yiming Shao
    Sisi Lin
    Yi Wu
    Li Bian
    Yiwen Zhang
    Drugs in R&D, 2024, 24 : 89 - 96
  • [44] Pharmacokinetics of Nitazoxanide Dry Suspensions After Single Oral Doses in Healthy Subjects: Food Effects Evaluation and Bioequivalence Study
    Zhang, Chenning
    Liang, Rui
    Liu, Dejie
    Wang, Xianghua
    Yang, Shuhua
    Hu, Qingwen
    Wen, Qing
    Zhao, Hengli
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY IN DRUG DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 13 (07): : 748 - 754
  • [45] Comparison of the systemic effects of fluticasone propionate and budesonide given by dry powder inhaler in healthy and asthmatic subjects
    Harrison, TW
    Wisniewski, A
    Honour, J
    Tattersfield, AE
    THORAX, 2001, 56 (03) : 186 - 191
  • [46] Pharmacokinetic and Bioequivalence Study of Lisinopril/Hydrochlorothiazide Tablet Under Fasting and Postprandial Conditions in Healthy Chinese Subjects
    Yang, Zhuan
    Mi, Xiaolan
    Li, Qin
    Chen, Lu
    Zeng, Yan
    Du, Peng
    Liu, Lin
    Liu, Shijing
    Zeng, Chen
    Zhang, Qian
    Zhou, Yan
    Xiong, Yun
    Li, Na
    Ze, Qiuyuan
    Chen, Jiyu
    He, Yan
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY IN DRUG DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 13 (02): : 160 - 167
  • [47] Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of sunitinib and Sutent® in Chinese healthy subjects: an open-label, randomized, crossover study
    Wang, Yanli
    Deng, Qiaohuan
    Gao, Zhenyue
    Liu, Guangwen
    Su, Zhengjie
    Zhao, Yicheng
    Zhang, Lixiu
    Yang, Haimiao
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [48] Study on the bioequivalence of zolpidem tartrate in healthy Chinese volunteers
    Xiong, Y.-Q.
    Jiang, M.
    Dai, Q.
    Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal, 2001, 36 (11) : 748 - 750
  • [49] Bioequivalence and Bioavailability of an Orodispersible Tablet of Sildenafil Citrate in Healthy Chinese Male Subjects
    Lv, Yuan
    Luo, Bin-yu
    LaBadie, Robert R.
    Zhu, Hua
    Feng, Yan
    Ernst, Cynthia
    Crownover, Penelope H.
    Liang, Yali
    Zhao, Qinying
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY IN DRUG DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 9 (05): : 573 - 581
  • [50] Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of a Generic and a Branded Budesonide Nasal Spray in Healthy Chinese Subjects
    Li, Xin
    Li, Yuan
    Xu, Bing
    Zhang, Ping
    Wang, Yangyang
    Wang, Zhenyu
    Hou, Shuguang
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY IN DRUG DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 11 (04): : 516 - 522