A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of melatonin as an adjuvant agent for induction of labor: The MILO trial

被引:0
|
作者
Quach, Diane [1 ,2 ]
Mol, Ben W. [2 ,3 ]
Springer, Jamie [1 ,2 ]
Tully, Erin [1 ,2 ]
Higgins, Chloe [1 ]
Jones, Madeleine [1 ,2 ]
Hennes, David [1 ,2 ]
Pham, Yen [4 ]
Swarnamani, Kamala [4 ]
Palmer, Kirsten [1 ,2 ]
Davies-Tuck, Miranda [4 ]
机构
[1] Monash Hlth, Monash Womens, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Aberdeen, Aberdeen Ctr Womens Hlth Res, Sch Med Med Sci & Nutr, Aberdeen, Scotland
[4] Hudson Inst Med Res, Ritchie Ctr, Clayton, Vic, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
cesarean birth; hypoglycemia; induction of labor; melatonin; obstetrics; pharmacokinetics; WOMEN; OXYTOCIN; NEWBORN; RISK;
D O I
10.1111/aogs.14951
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
IntroductionMelatonin has been suggested to have a biological role in the onset and progress of labor. We tested the hypothesis that the addition of melatonin during an induction of labor will reduce the need for a cesarean birth.Material and MethodsThis trial underwent protocol amendments that are detailed in the main text of the article. This trial is registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12616000311459). At a multi-center health service including secondary and tertiary obstetric hospitals, we performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in women with a singleton cephalic pregnancy, free of significant maternal or perinatal complications who were undergoing induction of labor (with or without cervical ripening). Women were randomized to 10 mg melatonin vs placebo, with cervical ripening as required, and then 6-h during their induction of labor to a maximum of four doses or until birth. The primary outcome was cesarean birth. Secondary outcomes included labor, maternal, and neonatal outcomes. Data were analyzed using intention to treat. Sub-group analyses based on mode of ripening and parity were also performed.ResultsBetween 2019 and 2021 we randomized 189 women (103 to melatonin and 86 to placebo). The study was prematurely terminated due to logistical complications resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. Cesarean rates were 28/103 (27.2%) in the melatonin group versus 20/84 (23.3%) in the placebo group (RR 1.17 95% CI 0.71-1.92). There were no significant differences in rate of cesarean birth between the melatonin and placebo groups for failure to progress (13.4% and 9.3%, respectively, RR 1.46; 95% CI 0.64-3.32) or suspected fetal distress (10.7% and 10.5%, respectively, RR 1.02; 95% CI 0.44-2.34). The melatonin group had significantly lower rates of spontaneous vaginal birth within 24 h (35.0% vs. 50.0%; RR 0.70 95% CI 0.50-0.98). The rates of secondary outcomes such as total length of labor, rate of postpartum hemorrhage, and instrumental birth were comparable. Babies born in the melatonin group were more likely to need admission to the special care nursery, namely for hypoglycemic monitoring (18.5% vs. 8.1% RR 2.26; 95% CI 1.00-5.10).ConclusionsIn women undergoing induction of labor, melatonin does not reduce the cesarean section rate. Melatonin use intrapartum may also be associated with neonatal hypoglycemia.
引用
收藏
页码:2442 / 2454
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Fluoxetine for depression in diabetes - A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial
    Lustman, PJ
    Freedland, KE
    Griffith, LS
    Clouse, RE
    DIABETES CARE, 2000, 23 (05) : 618 - 623
  • [32] Donepezil for cancer fatigue: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial
    Bruera, Eduardo
    El Osta, Badi
    Valero, Vicente
    Driver, Larry C.
    Pei, Be-Lian
    Shen, Loren
    Poulter, Valerie A.
    Palmer, J. Lynn
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (23) : 3475 - 3481
  • [33] Creatine Supplementation in Fibromyalgia: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
    Alves, Christiano R. R.
    Santiago, Bianca M.
    Lima, Fernanda R.
    Otaduy, Maria C. G.
    Calich, Ana Luisa
    Tritto, Aline C. C.
    de Sa Pinto, Ana Lucia
    Roschel, Hamilton
    Leite, Claudia C.
    Benatti, Fabiana B.
    Bonfa, Eloisa
    Gualano, Bruno
    ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2013, 65 (09) : 1449 - 1459
  • [34] Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of albuterol in facioscapulohumeral dystrophy
    Kissel, JT
    McDermott, MP
    Mendell, JR
    King, WM
    Pandya, S
    Griggs, RC
    Tawil, R
    Cos, L
    Langsam, A
    Martens, B
    Brower, C
    Herr, BE
    Figlewicz, D
    Forrester, J
    Downing, K
    Holloway, RG
    Hubble, J
    Kolassa, J
    NEUROLOGY, 2001, 57 (08) : 1434 - 1440
  • [35] A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Trial of Montelukast for Acute Bronchiolitis
    Amirav, Israel
    Luder, Anthony S.
    Kruger, Natalie
    Borovitch, Yael
    Babai, Ilan
    Miron, Dan
    Zuker, Miriam
    Tal, Gay
    Mandelberg, Avigdor
    PEDIATRICS, 2008, 122 (06) : E1249 - E1255
  • [36] Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of local analgesia in laparoscopy
    Einarsson, JI
    Sun, J
    Tarrant, T
    Young, AE
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 103 (04): : 21S - 21S
  • [37] Cerebrolysin in Alzheimer's disease: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with a neurotrophic agent
    M. Panisset
    S. Gauthier
    H. Moessler
    M. Windisch
    Journal of Neural Transmission, 2002, 109 : 1089 - 1104
  • [38] Pentoxifylline in ALS - A double-blind, randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial
    Meininger, V
    Asselain, B
    Guillet, P
    Leigh, PN
    Ludolph, A
    Lacomblez, L
    Robberecht, W
    NEUROLOGY, 2006, 66 (01) : 88 - 92
  • [39] RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL OF FEVERFEW IN MIGRAINE PREVENTION
    MURPHY, JJ
    HEPTINSTALL, S
    MITCHELL, JRA
    LANCET, 1988, 2 (8604): : 189 - 192
  • [40] A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Olanzapine in the Treatment of Trichotillomania
    Van Ameringen, Michael
    Mancini, Catherine
    Patterson, Beth
    Bennett, Mark
    Oakman, Jonathan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2010, 71 (10) : 1336 - 1343