Predictive parameters of prostate carcinoma in negative multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging patients

被引:0
|
作者
Bostanci, Coskun [1 ]
Erdem, Kazim [1 ]
机构
[1] Karabuk Training & Res Hosp, Karabuk, Turkiye
来源
CUKUROVA MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2024年 / 49卷 / 02期
关键词
Prostate biopsy; prostate volume; prostate-specific antigen density; prostate cancer; DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION; PSA DENSITY; CANCER; ANTIGEN; BIOPSY; SCORE; SERUM; RISK; MEN;
D O I
10.17826/cumj.1446498
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictors of prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer in prostate-specific antigen grey zone patients with pre-biopsy negative multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging.<br /> Materials and Methods: The study analyzed data from 227 patients with negative pre-biopsy multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging results. The detection rates of prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer were calculated, and simple and multiple logistic regression were used to evaluate the predictors of prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer.<br /> Results: The overall prostate cancer rate was 18.9% and the clinically significant prostate cancer detection rate was 8.8%. Multivariate analysis revealed that prostate-specific antigen density and abnormal digital rectal examination were the independent predictive factors for prostate carcinoma, while age and abnormal digital rectal examination were the independent predictive factors for clinically significant prostate carcinoma. Prostate-specific antigen density with the cutoff value of > 0,12 ng/ml/cc had the highest area under curve values for clinically significant prostate carcinoma followed by prostate volume with a cutoff value of <= 46 cc.<br /> Conclusion: Based on the findings of the study, the cutoff value of prostate-specific antigen density of > 0,12 ng/ml/cc and prostate volume <= 46 cc might be considered for biopsy decision in grey zone patients regardless of multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance results. However, further studies with larger cohorts are required to validate these recommendations.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 488
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate - a basic tutorial
    Cabarrus, Miguel C.
    Westphalen, Antonio C.
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2017, 6 (03) : 376 - 386
  • [32] ADDED VALUE OF MULTIPARAMETRIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN PATIENTS WITH NEGATIVE ULTRASOUND-GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSY
    Fandella, Andrea
    Di Toma, Francesco
    Spaliviero, Bernardino
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2011, 31 (05) : 1858 - 1858
  • [33] Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Risk Group Stratification of Prostate Adenocarcinoma
    Bonebrake, Benjamin
    Parr, Elsa
    Huynh, Linda My
    Coutu, Brendan
    Hansen, Neil
    Teply, Benjamin
    Enke, Charles
    Lagrange, Chad
    Baine, Michael
    ADVANCES IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 9 (06)
  • [35] Negative Predictive Value of Prostate Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging among Men with Negative Prostate Biopsy and Elevated Prostate Specific Antigen: A Clinical Outcome Retrospective Cohort Study COMMENT
    Polascik, Thomas J.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 202 (06): : 1164 - 1165
  • [36] Clinical Utility of Negative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer and Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Wagaskar, Vinayak G.
    Levy, Micah
    Ratnani, Parita
    Moody, Kate
    Garcia, Mariely
    Pedraza, Adriana M.
    Parekh, Sneha
    Pandav, Krunal
    Shukla, Bhavya
    Prasad, Sonya
    Sobotka, Stanislaw
    Haines, Kenneth, III
    Punnen, Sanoj
    Wiklund, Peter
    Tewari, Ash
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2021, 28 : 9 - 16
  • [37] Nomogram predicting prostate cancer in patients with negative prebiopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance
    Chen, Ming
    Wang, Ren
    Zhang, Tingting
    Zhang, Xiangmin
    Wan, Yonglin
    Fu, Xiaohong
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2022, 18 (12) : 1473 - 1483
  • [38] Diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer after negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging
    Zattoni, Fabio
    Morlacco, Alessandro
    Soligo, Matteo
    Mancini, Mariangela
    Leone, Nicolo
    Zecchini, Giovanni
    Reitano, Giuseppe
    Bednarova, Iliana
    Lacognata, Carmelo Salvino
    Lauro, Alberto
    Zanovello, Nicola
    Novara, Giacomo
    dal Moro, Fabrizio
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 75 (03) : 277 - 283
  • [39] Comparison of multiparametric ultrasound versus multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of carcinoma prostate: The CADMUS trial
    Tarigopula, Vivek
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 38 (04) : 321 - 322
  • [40] Prostate Carcinoma in Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biopsy Negative Prostate Lobes: Implication for Focal Therapy
    Kong, Max
    Deng, Fang-Ming
    Melamed, Jonathan
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew
    Lepor, Herbert
    Taneja, Samir
    Zhou, Ming
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2015, 28 : 235A - 235A