A review of STEM education research in BRICS countries: an analysis of research trends

被引:0
|
作者
Fayzullina, Albina R. [1 ]
Zulfugarzade, Teymur E. [2 ]
Kondakchian, Nataliia A. [3 ]
Aytuganova, Jhanna I. [4 ]
Khvatova, Maria A. [5 ]
Kelina, Kirena G. [3 ]
机构
[1] Kazan Fed Univ, Inst Int Relat, Kazan, Russia
[2] Plekhanov Russian Univ Econ, Dept Civil Legal Disciplines, Moscow, Russia
[3] IM Sechenov First Moscow State Med Univ, Inst Linguist & Intercultural Commun, Moscow, Russia
[4] Kazan State Power Engn Univ, Dept Foreign Languages, Kazan, Russia
[5] Bauman Moscow State Tech Univ, Dept Secur Digital World, Moscow, Russia
关键词
STEM education; BRICS; bibliometric analysis; research trends; review;
D O I
10.3389/feduc.2024.1410069
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Research has emphasized the importance of STEM for countries. Many studies have been conducted on STEM education research in countries worldwide. However, there is a lack of research on reviewing the research on STEM education in BRICS countries. Based on this rationale, this paper analyzes research patterns and trends related to STEM education in BRICS countries. The study examined 3,580 journal articles from 2014 to 2023 on STEM education in BRICS countries using the bibliometric analysis method, revealing a significant increase in research. The results showed that the number of published articles increased annually, and 85% were published after 2017. The top three journals publishing STEM studies were the Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Sustainability, and the International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning. China had the highest number of articles on STEM education based on country affiliation, followed by South Africa, India, Brazil, and Russia. The authors' authorship collaborations revealed that China had the most prominent connections compared to other countries. The keywords analysis revealed four research trends: (i) the effects of STEM education on learning outcomes, (ii) the impacts of instructional strategies in engineering education, (iii) gender differences in STEM education, and (iv) the use of artificial intelligence, project-based learning, and active learning. Based on the analyses, researchers suggest recommendations for future research.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条