Outcomes for smokers who develop melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Friedman, Erica B. [1 ]
Williams, Gabrielle J. [2 ,3 ]
Lo, Serigne N. [2 ,3 ]
Thompson, John F. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] New York Univ Langone Hlth, Dept Surg, New York, NY USA
[2] Univ Sydney, Melanoma Inst Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Western Australia, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Perth, WA, Australia
关键词
Melanoma; Smoking; Prognosis; Nicotine; IMMUNE-CHECKPOINT INHIBITORS; LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION; CIGARETTE-SMOKING; MALIGNANT-MELANOMA; RISK-FACTORS; CANCER; COMPLICATIONS; ASSOCIATION; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102872
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background There is compelling evidence that the incidence of melanoma in cigarette smokers is substantially lower than in non-smokers. However, the risks of both recurrence and death appear to be higher in smokers if melanoma does develop. The magnitude of these increased risks is poorly documented. This systematic review aimed to analyse melanoma survival outcomes among smokers compared to never-smokers using published studies, and report the magnitude of any survival differences. Methods Searches of Medline, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL (to 11/03/2024) using terms for melanoma and smoking were conducted. Included studies were those reporting outcomes including disease severity at presentation, risk of death or adverse effects from treatment in smokers and never-smokers with melanoma. No study design or language restrictions were imposed. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa - Ottawa tool. The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (ID CRD42024518505). Findings Forty-six studies involving 164,166 melanoma patients, of whom 70,766 had smoked cigarettes, were identified. fi ed. The pooled individual Hazard Ratios (HR) from multivariable analyses, showed that death from melanoma was 33% higher in current compared to never-smokers (HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.14-1.55, - 1.55, p = 0.0002, 13,971+ patients) with limited heterogeneity (I2 2 11%). However, former-smokers and never-smokers had very similar rates of death from melanoma (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.94-1.14, - 1.14, p = 0.52, 16,307+ patients) with moderate heterogeneity (I2 2 63%). From univariable analyses, current-smokers had a higher risk of sentinel node-positivity compared to never- smokers (HR 1.35 95% CI 1.13, 1.62, p = 0.001, 5163 patients). Ever-smokers had a greater risk of complications from sentinel node biopsy (Odds Ratio (OR) 2.0 95% CI 1.41-2.85, - 2.85, p = 0.0001, 3745 patients) and lymph node dissection (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.23-2.20, - 2.20, p = 0.0007, 4596 patients) than never-smokers based on risks from multivariable analyses. Interpretation Current smokers are more likely to die from their melanoma than never-smokers, while former- smokers appear to have similar risks to never-smokers. Smokers have higher risks of sentinel node-positivity and of complications from node surgery. Study limitations included reliance on self-reporting of smoking status. In only seven studies did patients receive modern systemic therapies, limiting the ability to assess their relative efficacy fi cacy in smokers and non-smokers. 2024;77: Published https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.eclinm.2024. 102872
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Surgical treatment of anorectal melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jutten, Esther
    Kruijff, Schelto
    Francken, Anne Brecht
    Holzik, Martijn F. Lutke
    van Leeuwen, Barbara L.
    van Westreenen, Henderik L.
    van Westreenen, L.
    Wevers, Kevin P.
    BJS OPEN, 2021, 5 (06):
  • [32] Image analysis of cutaneous melanoma histology: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Emily L. Clarke
    Ryckie G. Wade
    Derek Magee
    Julia Newton-Bishop
    Darren Treanor
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [33] A systematic review and meta-analysis of animal-type melanoma
    Vyas, Ritva
    Keller, Jesse J.
    Honda, Kord
    Cooper, Kevin D.
    Gerstenblith, Meg R.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2015, 73 (06) : 1031 - 1039
  • [34] Systematic review and meta-analysis of genomic alterations in acral melanoma
    Broit, Natasa
    Johansson, Peter A.
    Rodgers, Chloe B.
    Walpole, Sebastian T.
    Hayward, Nicholas K.
    Pritchard, Antonia L.
    PIGMENT CELL & MELANOMA RESEARCH, 2022, 35 (03) : 369 - 386
  • [35] The impact of statins on melanoma survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    McKechnie, Tyler
    Talwar, Gaurav
    Grewal, Shan
    Wang, Austine
    Eskicioglu, Cagla
    Parvez, Elena
    MELANOMA RESEARCH, 2024, 34 (06) : 475 - 486
  • [36] Melanoma and Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Liu, Rui
    Gao, Xiang
    Lu, Yi
    Chen, Honglei
    NEUROLOGY, 2011, 76 (09) : A122 - A123
  • [37] Health Outcomes of Sarcopenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Beaudart, Charlotte
    Zaaria, Myriam
    Pasleau, Francoise
    Reginster, Jean-Yves
    Bruyere, Olivier
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (01):
  • [38] Forehead Reduction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Outcomes
    Vila, Peter M.
    Somani, Shaan N.
    Wafford, Q. Eileen
    Sidle, Douglas M.
    FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY & AESTHETIC MEDICINE, 2022, 24 (01) : 34 - 40
  • [39] Systematic Review/Meta-analysis Outcomes and Safety of Transcaval Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Salihu, Adil
    Ferlay, Clemence
    Kirsch, Matthias
    Shah, Pinak B.
    Skali, Hicham
    Fournier, Stephane
    Muller, Olivier
    Hugelshofer, Sarah
    Skalidis, Ioannis
    Tzimas, Georgios
    Monney, Pierre
    Eeckhout, Eric
    Arangalage, Dimitri
    Rancati, Valentina
    Antiochos, Panagiotis
    Lu, Henri
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 40 (11) : 2054 - 2062
  • [40] OUTCOMES OF ROBOTIC SACROCOLPOPEXY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Hudson, C. O.
    Northington, G. M.
    Karp, D. R.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2012, 23 : S200 - S201