Outcomes for smokers who develop melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Friedman, Erica B. [1 ]
Williams, Gabrielle J. [2 ,3 ]
Lo, Serigne N. [2 ,3 ]
Thompson, John F. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] New York Univ Langone Hlth, Dept Surg, New York, NY USA
[2] Univ Sydney, Melanoma Inst Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Western Australia, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Perth, WA, Australia
关键词
Melanoma; Smoking; Prognosis; Nicotine; IMMUNE-CHECKPOINT INHIBITORS; LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION; CIGARETTE-SMOKING; MALIGNANT-MELANOMA; RISK-FACTORS; CANCER; COMPLICATIONS; ASSOCIATION; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102872
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background There is compelling evidence that the incidence of melanoma in cigarette smokers is substantially lower than in non-smokers. However, the risks of both recurrence and death appear to be higher in smokers if melanoma does develop. The magnitude of these increased risks is poorly documented. This systematic review aimed to analyse melanoma survival outcomes among smokers compared to never-smokers using published studies, and report the magnitude of any survival differences. Methods Searches of Medline, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL (to 11/03/2024) using terms for melanoma and smoking were conducted. Included studies were those reporting outcomes including disease severity at presentation, risk of death or adverse effects from treatment in smokers and never-smokers with melanoma. No study design or language restrictions were imposed. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa - Ottawa tool. The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (ID CRD42024518505). Findings Forty-six studies involving 164,166 melanoma patients, of whom 70,766 had smoked cigarettes, were identified. fi ed. The pooled individual Hazard Ratios (HR) from multivariable analyses, showed that death from melanoma was 33% higher in current compared to never-smokers (HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.14-1.55, - 1.55, p = 0.0002, 13,971+ patients) with limited heterogeneity (I2 2 11%). However, former-smokers and never-smokers had very similar rates of death from melanoma (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.94-1.14, - 1.14, p = 0.52, 16,307+ patients) with moderate heterogeneity (I2 2 63%). From univariable analyses, current-smokers had a higher risk of sentinel node-positivity compared to never- smokers (HR 1.35 95% CI 1.13, 1.62, p = 0.001, 5163 patients). Ever-smokers had a greater risk of complications from sentinel node biopsy (Odds Ratio (OR) 2.0 95% CI 1.41-2.85, - 2.85, p = 0.0001, 3745 patients) and lymph node dissection (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.23-2.20, - 2.20, p = 0.0007, 4596 patients) than never-smokers based on risks from multivariable analyses. Interpretation Current smokers are more likely to die from their melanoma than never-smokers, while former- smokers appear to have similar risks to never-smokers. Smokers have higher risks of sentinel node-positivity and of complications from node surgery. Study limitations included reliance on self-reporting of smoking status. In only seven studies did patients receive modern systemic therapies, limiting the ability to assess their relative efficacy fi cacy in smokers and non-smokers. 2024;77: Published https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.eclinm.2024. 102872
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Metastatic acral melanoma treatment outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cho, K. K.
    Cust, A. E.
    Foo, Y. M.
    Eslick, G.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2019, 30
  • [2] Metastatic acral melanoma treatment outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cho, Kenneth
    Cust, Anne
    Foo, Yun Megan
    Eslick, Guy
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 15 : 124 - 124
  • [3] Metastatic acral melanoma treatment outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cho, Kenneth K.
    Cust, Anne E.
    Foo, Yun Megan
    Long, Georgina V.
    Menzies, Alexander M.
    Eslick, Guy D.
    MELANOMA RESEARCH, 2021, 31 (05) : 482 - 486
  • [4] Surgical margins and outcomes for eyelid melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Catherine E. Pisano
    Megan H. Trager
    Weijia Fan
    Faramarz H. Samie
    Archives of Dermatological Research, 316
  • [5] Surgical margins and outcomes for eyelid melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pisano, Catherine E.
    Trager, Megan H.
    Fan, Weijia
    Samie, Faramarz H.
    ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 316 (04)
  • [6] Current Evidence on Dental Implants Outcomes in Smokers and Nonsmokers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Alfadda, Sara A.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2018, 44 (05) : 390 - 399
  • [7] Systematic review and meta-analysis on the proportion of patients with breast cancer who develop bone metastases
    Body, Jean-Jacques
    Quinn, Geoffrey
    Talbot, Susan
    Booth, Emma
    Demonty, Gaston
    Taylor, Aliki
    Amelio, Justyna
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2017, 115 : 67 - 80
  • [8] The Risk of Nonunion in Smokers Revisited: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Nunna, Ravi S.
    Ostrov, Philip B.
    Ansari, Darius
    Dettori, Joseph R.
    Godolias, Periklis
    Elias, Elias
    Tran, Angela
    Oskouian, Rod J.
    Hart, Robert
    Abdul-Jabbar, Amir
    Jackson, Keith L.
    Devine, John G.
    Mehta, Ankit I.
    Adogwa, Owoicho
    Chapman, Jens R.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2022, 12 (03) : 526 - 539
  • [9] A systematic literature review and network meta-analysis of effectiveness and safety outcomes in advanced melanoma
    Franken, Margreet G.
    Leeneman, Brenda
    Gheorghe, Maria
    Uyl-de Groot, Carin A.
    Haanen, John B. A. G.
    van Baal, Pieter H. M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2019, 123 : 58 - 71
  • [10] Height and risk of melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yu, Dao-Jiang
    Li, Xiu-Jie
    Morice, Anne
    Wu, Li-Jun
    Sun, Wei
    Zhao, Tian-Lan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2018, 11 (05): : 4426 - 4435