Small-strain shear modulus of granular materials and its dependence on stress states and fabric

被引:0
|
作者
Jiang, Mingjin [1 ]
Yang, Jun [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Civil Engn, Pokfulam Rd, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Small-strain shear modulus; Discrete element method; Granular materials; Triaxial tests; Mechanical coordination number; Fabric anisotropy; LIQUEFACTION RESISTANCE; ANISOTROPIC STRESS; STIFFNESS; DEM; TRANSMISSION; SOILS; SIMULATIONS; EVOLUTION; BEHAVIOR; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.compgeo.2025.107183
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This paper presents a comprehensive study on the evolution of the small-strain shear modulus (G) of granular materials during hydrostatic compression, conventional triaxial, reduced triaxial, and p-constant triaxial tests using 3D discrete element method. Results from the hydrostatic compression tests indicate that G can be precisely estimated using Hardin's equation and that a linear correlation exists between a stress-normalized G and a function of mechanical coordination number and void ratio. During the triaxial tests, the specimen fabric, which refers to the contact network within the particle assembly, remains almost unchanged within a threshold range of stress ratio (SR). The disparity between measured G and predicted G, as per empirical equations, is less than 10% within this range. However, once this threshold range is exceeded, G experiences a significant SR effect, primarily due to considerable adjustments in the specimen's fabric. The study concludes that fabric information becomes crucial for accurate G prediction when SR threshold is exceeded. A stiffness-stress-fabric relationship spanning a wide range of SR is put forward by incorporating the influences of redistribution of contact forces, effective connectivity of fabric, and fabric anisotropy into the empirical equation.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Dynamic Behaviour of Granular Soil Materials Mixed with Granulated Rubber: Effect of Rubber Content and Granularity on the Small-Strain Shear Modulus and Damping Ratio
    Pistolas G.A.
    Anastasiadis A.
    Pitilakis K.
    Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2018, 36 (02) : 1267 - 1281
  • [32] A new prediction model of small-strain shear modulus of sandy soils
    Liang Ke
    Chen Guo-xing
    Hang Tian-zhu
    Liu Kang
    He Yang
    ROCK AND SOIL MECHANICS, 2020, 41 (06) : 1963 - 1970
  • [33] Spatial and temporal changes in small-strain shear modulus of geogrid-stabilized crushed aggregate materials
    Yesnik, Chelsey
    Soliman, Haithem
    Morozov, Igor
    Fleming, Ian
    Landry, Ethan
    TRANSPORTATION GEOTECHNICS, 2025, 50
  • [34] The Influence of Void Ratio on Small Strain Shear Modulus of Granular Materials: A Micromechanical Perspective
    Xu, Xiaomin
    Cheng, Yipik
    Ling, Dongsheng
    POWDERS AND GRAINS 2013, 2013, 1542 : 201 - 204
  • [35] Influence of soil type on the effect of strain rate on small-strain cyclic shear modulus
    Vucetic, M
    Tabata, K
    SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS, 2003, 43 (05) : 161 - 173
  • [36] Stress-state dependency of small-strain shear modulus in silty sand and sandy silt of Ganga
    Prashant, A.
    Bhattacharya, D.
    Gundlapalli, S.
    GEOTECHNIQUE, 2019, 69 (01): : 42 - 56
  • [37] Correlation between Small-Strain Shear Modulus and Suction Stress in Capillary Regime under Zero Total Stress Conditions
    Dong, Yi
    Lu, Ning
    JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 142 (11)
  • [38] Cyclic Loading Test for the Small-Strain Shear Modulus of Saturated Soft Clay and Its Failure Mechanism
    Zhu, Zhende
    Zhang, Cong
    Wang, Jun
    Zhang, Peng
    Zhu, Duan
    GEOFLUIDS, 2021, 2021
  • [39] LABORATORY AND FIELD DETERMINATIONS OF SMALL-STRAIN SHEAR MODULUS FOR A STRUCTURED CHAMPLAIN CLAY
    LEFEBVRE, G
    LEBOEUF, D
    RAHHAL, ME
    LACROIX, A
    WARDE, J
    STOKOE, KH
    CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 31 (01) : 61 - 70
  • [40] Small-Strain Shear Modulus and Strength Increase of Cement-Treated Clay
    Flores, R. D. Verastegui
    Di Emidio, G.
    Van Impe, W. F.
    GEOTECHNICAL TESTING JOURNAL, 2010, 33 (01): : 62 - 71