Analysis of Maintenance 5.0 Implementation Challenges: An Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) and Fuzzy MICMAC

被引:0
|
作者
Aktef, Zineb [1 ]
Cherrafi, Anass [1 ]
Elfezazi, Said [1 ]
机构
[1] Cadi Ayyad Univ, EST Safi, Marrakech Safi, Marrakesh, Morocco
关键词
Maintenance; 5.0; Industry; ISM Method; MICMAC Analysis; SUPPLY CHAIN;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-031-67195-1_72
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This paper aims to identify and analyze the maintenance 5.0 implementation challenges in the manufacturing industry. This study applied an approach by developing a structural relationship model based on interpretive structural modeling (ISM) and fuzzy input-based cross-impact matrix multiplication applied to classification (MICMAC) to analyze and prioritize the challenges impacting the implementation of maintenance 5.0 approaches. Results confirmed that the barriers, complexity of technology (CT), and cybersecurity risks (CSR) are situated at the lowest level of the hierarchy, alluding to an important driver power. The barriers of insufficient and poor-quality data (IPD), lack of adequate training (LAT), and lack of qualified workforce (LQW) are identified in the category of the linkage challenges with strong driving and dependence powers. It is also observed that the high implementation costs (HIC) is a feeble driver but heavily dependent on the other challenges. The findings of this study simplify the process for decision-makers to address and mitigate these barriers. Further, the limitations of this study have been listed, offering opportunities for further investigation in this research area. Finally, future research directions and theoretical and managerial implications are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:649 / 657
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Priority Challenges of University Technology Transfer with Interpretative Structural Modeling and MICMAC Analysis
    Quinones, Renissa S.
    Caladcad, June Anne A.
    Quinones, Hubert G.
    Castro, Charena J.
    Caballes, Shirley Ann A.
    Abellana, Dharyll Prince M.
    Jabilles, Eula Margareth Y.
    Himang, Celbert M.
    Ocampo, Lanndon A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2020, 17 (05)
  • [22] Barriers to sustainable supply chain management implementation in Egyptian industries: an interpretive structural modeling (ISM) approach
    Zayed, Esraa Osama
    Yaseen, Ehab A.
    MANAGEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2021, 32 (06) : 1192 - 1209
  • [23] Understanding the risk factors of BIM technology implementation in the construction industry: an interpretive structural modeling (ISM) approach
    Sun, Chengshuang
    Xu, Hanting
    Jiang, Shaohua
    ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECTURAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 27 (10) : 3289 - 3308
  • [24] Modeling of strategic thinking enablers: a modified total interpretive structural modeling (TISM) and MICMAC approach
    Dhir, Sanjay
    Dhir, Swati
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEM ASSURANCE ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 11 (01) : 175 - 188
  • [25] Analysis of barriers for sustainable agro-food supply chain: an interpretive structural modeling and MICMAC approach
    Singh, Kuldeep
    Abraham, Rebecca
    Yadav, Jitendra
    Agrawal, Amit Kumar
    Kolar, Prasanna
    Misra, Madhvendra
    Yadav, Avikshit
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 26 (10) : 25311 - 25333
  • [26] Customer co-creation in hotel service innovation: An interpretive structural modeling and MICMAC analysis approach
    Sarmah, Bijoylaxmi
    Rahman, Zillur
    BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2018, 25 (01) : 297 - 318
  • [27] Barriers to Building Information Modeling (BIM) implementation in China's prefabricated construction: An interpretive structural modeling (ISM) approach
    Tan, Tan
    Chen, Ke
    Xue, Fan
    Lu, Weisheng
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 219 : 949 - 959
  • [28] Analysis of factors inhibiting the customer engagement of eHealth in India: Modeling the barriers using ISM-Fuzzy MICMAC analysis
    Das, Dikhita
    Sengar, Anita
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2023, 178
  • [29] A Study of Supply Chain Risk in the Brazilian Wind Power Projects by Interpretive Structural Modeling and MICMAC Analysis
    Troche-Escobar, Jorge Arnaldo
    Lepikson, Herman Augusto
    Mendonca Freires, Francisco Gaudencio
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (10)
  • [30] Interpretive framework for analyzing lean implementation using ISM and IRP modeling
    Chaple, Anup Prabhakarrao
    Narkhede, Balkrishna Eknath
    Akarte, Milind M.
    Raut, Rakesh
    BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2018, 25 (09) : 3406 - 3442