Analysis of Mammography BI-RADS Distribution and Follow-up Ultrasound Assessment: A Single-Center Study

被引:0
|
作者
Kankaya, Burak [1 ]
Buyukasik, Suleyman [1 ]
Altundal, Yusuf Emre [1 ]
Topcu, Feyza Sonmez [2 ]
Rahmanbakhsh, Paria [1 ]
Etemad, Ayden [1 ]
Kapan, Selin [1 ]
Alis, Halil [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Aydin Univ, Fac Med, Dept Gen Surg, Besyol Mah Akasya Sok 4, TR-34295 Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Istanbul Aydin Univ, Fac Med, Dept Radiol, Istanbul, Turkiye
来源
关键词
breast ultrasonography; mammography; breast cancer; early diagnosis; BI-RADS classification; BREAST-CANCER;
D O I
10.2147/BCTT.S481201
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Our study has three main aims: 1) to assess the distribution of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classifications in a cohort of Turkish women undergoing screening mammography, 2) to analyze the frequency and non-completion rates of recommended follow-up ultrasound (US) examinations, and 3) to examine the outcomes of completed follow-up US examinations. Our goal was to evaluate potential gaps in the current breast cancer screening process by analyzing BI-RADS classifications, follow-up completion rates, and outcomes of completed ultrasound examinations. Patients and Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 1761 Turkish women who underwent screening mammography from 2020-2022 at the Istanbul Aydin University General Surgery Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey. We assessed the distribution of BI-RADS classifications, analyzed the frequency and non-completion rates of recommended follow-up US, and examined the outcomes of completed follow-up US examinations. Chi-square tests of independence and Spearman's rank correlation test were used to analyze the data. Results: Our study revealed three key findings: 1) Over half of mammograms (55.9%) were classified as BI-RADS 0, requiring further imaging. 2) Nearly one-third of patients who recommended US examinations (31.91%) did not complete recommended followup ultrasound appointments. 3) Among those who completed follow-up ultrasonography, almost one-third (29.7%) were reclassified as BI-RADS 3 or higher. Notably, 2.3% (n=18) were classified as BI-RADS 4 or 5, suggesting findings suspicious for malignancy. Conclusion: Our findings highlight the crucial role of follow-up US in breast cancer screening. The high rate of initial BI-RADS 0 classifications using mammography, coupled with the significant non-completion rate for follow-up US examinations, particularly among older age groups, highlights potential gaps in the current screening process.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 122
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Long-term follow-up of congenital hydronephrosis in a single-center study
    Morizawa, Yosuke
    Aoki, Katsuya
    Fukui, Shinji
    Tomizawa, Mitsuru
    Shimizu, Takuto
    Onishi, Kenta
    Hori, Shunta
    Gotoh, Daisuke
    Nakai, Yasushi
    Miyake, Makito
    Torimoto, Kazumasa
    Fujimoto, Ken
    Otani, Takeshi
    Fujimoto, Kiyohide
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 31 (05) : 507 - 511
  • [22] Mastocytosis in children: a single-center long-term follow-up study
    Popadic, Svetlana
    Lalosevic, Jovan
    Lekic, Branislav
    Gajic-Veljic, Mirjana
    Bonaci-Nikolic, Branka
    Nikolic, Milos
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2023, 62 (05) : 616 - 620
  • [23] Recommendation for Short-Interval Follow-Up Examinations After a Probably Benign Assessment: Is Clinical Practice Consistent With BI-RADS Guidance?
    Bowles, Erin J. Aiello
    Sickles, Edward A.
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    Carney, Patricia A.
    Elmore, Joann G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 194 (04) : 1152 - 1159
  • [24] First ultrasound diagnosis of BI-RADS 3 lesions in young patients: Can 6-months follow-up be sufficient to assess stability?
    Marcon, Magda
    Frauenfelder, Thomas
    Becker, Anton S.
    Dedes, Konstantin J.
    Boss, Andreas
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 89 : 226 - 233
  • [25] Is a one-year follow-up an efficient method for better management of MRI BI-RADS® 3 lesions?
    Boisserie-Lacroix, Martine
    Ziade, Caroline
    Hurtevent-Labrot, Gabrielle
    Ferron, Stephane
    Brouste, Veronique
    Lippa, Nicolas
    BREAST, 2016, 27 : 1 - 7
  • [26] Central tegmental tract hyperintensity: follow-up outcomes from a single-center study
    Dablan, Ali
    Limon, Yusuf Kerem
    Oktay, Cemil
    Karaali, Kamil
    NEURORADIOLOGY, 2023, 65 (07) : 1165 - 1171
  • [27] Central tegmental tract hyperintensity: follow-up outcomes from a single-center study
    Ali Dablan
    Yusuf Kerem Limon
    Cemil Oktay
    Kamil Karaali
    Neuroradiology, 2023, 65 : 1165 - 1171
  • [28] Premature Structural Failure of Trifecta Bioprosthesis in Midterm Follow-up: A Single-Center Study
    Kattach, Hassan
    Shah, Benoy N.
    Harden, Stephen
    Barlow, Clifford W.
    Miskolczi, Szabolcs
    Velissaris, Theodore
    Ohri, Sunil K.
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2021, 112 (05): : 1424 - 1431
  • [29] Combined mammography and breast ultrasound are required for a good accuracy of BI-RADS 4/5 results - findings of a breast imaging reference center
    Fasching, PA
    Wenkel, E
    Bani, MR
    Bautz, W
    Papadopoulos, T
    Beckmann, MW
    Schulz-Wendtland, R
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2005, 94 : S88 - S89
  • [30] A single center follow-up study of intracarotid plaque neovascularization by contrast enhanced ultrasound
    Zhong, Junlin
    Zhang, Hui
    Zhang, Aohua
    Zhang, Yanling
    Zheng, Rongqin
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 72 (16) : C203 - C203