Validity and reliability of an immersive virtual reality adaptation of the 6-minute pegboard and ring test

被引:0
|
作者
Maden, Cagtay [1 ]
Karabulut, Demet Gozacan [1 ]
Bagci, Burcu [2 ]
机构
[1] Gaziantep Islam Sci & Technol Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy & Rehabil, Gaziantep, Turkiye
[2] SANKO Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy & Rehabil, Gaziantep, Turkiye
来源
HAND SURGERY & REHABILITATION | 2025年 / 44卷 / 01期
关键词
6-minute pegboard and ring test; Virtual reality; Assessment; Upper extremity functional capacity; Endurance; Tele-rehabilitation; TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.hansur.2024.101981
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Aim: Virtual reality offers new clinical assessment and rehabilitation options that can complement or, in some cases, replace traditional methods. However, the applicability of using virtual reality tools for assessment of upper limb functional capacity has not been fully explored. We therefore developed an immersive virtual reality adaptation of the 6-Minute Pegboard and Ring Test (6PBRT-VR). The aim of the study was to test the validity and reliability of the 6PBRT-VR for the assessment of upper extremity functional capacity, and to assess the performance and feasibility of the proposed tool. Methods: Thirty healthy young adults were included in the study. The participants performed the classical 6-Minute Pegboard and Ring Test first and then the 6PBRT-VR. The test-retest reliability of the 6PBRT-VR was assessed on intraclass correlation coefficient. Concurrent validity was assessed on the correlation between the 6PBRT-VR test-retest scores (number of rings moved) and the correlation between the scores from the classical 6-Minute Pegboard and Ring Test and the 6PBRT-VR. Convergent validity was assessed on correlations with handgrip strength and the total Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score. Cardiorespiratory responses were also measured (at baseline and after each test). Perceived arm fatigue was assessed on the Modified Borg Scale. Results: The 6PBRT-VR exhibited excellent test-retest reliability, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.866 (95% confidence interval 0.737-0.934). Mean 6PBRT-VR score correlated strongly with the mean score of the classical 6-Minute Pegboard and Ring Test (r = 0.817, p < 0.001). A significant association was found between the 6PBRT-VR and the classical 6-Minute Pegboard and Ring Test in terms of variations in heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and Modified Borg Scale score (p < 0.001). Mean 6PBRT-VR score showed moderate correlations with right (r = 0.571, p = 0.001) and left handgrip strength (r = 0.550, p = 0.002). Conclusion: The 6PBRT-VR is a reliable and valid virtual tool for assessing upper-extremity functional capacity in young adults. @ 2024 SFCM. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Validity and reliability of the 6-minute walk test over a distance of 6 meters in people with multiple sclerosis
    Ferchichi-Barbey, Sylvie
    Guex, Kenny
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2021, 27 (3_SUPPL) : 14 - 14
  • [22] The 6-Minute Pegboard and Ring Test (6PBRT) for Evaluation of Upper Limbs Functional Capacity in Hemodialysis Patients: A Validation Study
    Lima, Vanessa Pereira
    Lopes, Paulo Henrique
    Costa, Henrique Silveira
    Costa, Maria Carolina Barbosa
    Rocha, Jefferson Freitas
    Rodrigues, Vanessa Gomes Brandao
    Maciel, Emilio Henrique Barroso
    Alves, Frederico Lopes
    Prates, Maria Cecilia Sales Mendes
    Campos, Patricia Cardoso
    Lacerda, Ana Cristina Rodrigues
    Figueiredo, Pedro Henrique Scheidt
    PHYSIOTHERAPY CANADA, 2023,
  • [23] Validity and Reliability of the 6-Minute Step Test in Healthy Individuals: A Cross-sectional Study
    Arcuri, Juliano F.
    Borghi-Silva, Audrey
    Labadessa, Ivana G.
    Sentanin, Anna C.
    Candolo, Cecilia
    Pires Di Lorenzo, Valeria A.
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF SPORT MEDICINE, 2016, 26 (01): : 69 - 75
  • [24] Validity of the 6-minute walking test in juvenile idiopathic arthritis
    Lelieveld, OTHM
    Takken, T
    van der Net, J
    Van Weert, E
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM-ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2005, 53 (02): : 304 - 307
  • [25] Validity And Reproducibility Of The 6-Minute Walk Test In Cancer Patients
    Schmidt, Katharina
    Thiel, Christian
    Vogt, Lutz
    Lungwitz, Anja
    Bernhoerster, Marcus
    Jaeger, Elke
    Banzer, Winfried
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2012, 44 : 188 - 188
  • [26] Reliability Of The 6-minute Walk Test In Adults With Intellectual Disabilities
    Guerra, Miriam
    Oviedo, Guillermo
    Javierre, Casimiro
    Carmen Delicado, Ma
    Soto, Carlos
    Carbo, Maria
    Fernhall, Bo
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2013, 45 (05): : 74 - 75
  • [27] Reliability, construct validity and determinants of 6-minute walk test performance in patients with chronic heart failure
    Uszko-Lencer, Nicole H. M. K.
    Mesquita, Rafael
    Janssen, Eefje
    Werter, Christ
    Rocca, Hans-Peter Brunner-La
    Pitta, Fabio
    Wouters, Emiel F. M.
    Spruit, Martijn A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 240 : 285 - 290
  • [28] RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE 6-MINUTE WALK TEST AS AN OUTCOME MEASURE IN OCULO-PHARYNGEAL MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY
    Youssof, S.
    Fernandez, M.
    MUSCLE & NERVE, 2015, 52 : S5 - S5
  • [29] The 6-minute walk test in outpatient cardiac rehabilitation: validity, reliability and responsiveness-a systematic review
    Bellet, R. Nicole
    Adams, Lewis
    Morris, Norman R.
    PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2012, 98 (04) : 277 - 287
  • [30] Test-retest reliability, construct validity and determinants of 6-minute walk test performance in adult patients with asthma
    Meys, R.
    Janssen, S. M. J.
    Franssena, F. M. E.
    Vaesa, A. W.
    Stoffels, A. A. F.
    van Hees, H. W. H.
    van den Borstd, B.
    Klijn, P. H.
    Burtin, C.
    van 't Hul, A. J.
    Spruit, M. A.
    PULMONOLOGY, 2023, 29 (06): : 486 - 494