Shaping the Future of Healthcare: Ethical Clinical Challenges and Pathways to Trustworthy AI

被引:0
|
作者
Goktas, Polat [1 ]
Grzybowski, Andrzej [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Dublin, UCD Sch Comp Sci, Dublin D04 V1W8, Ireland
[2] Univ Warmia & Mazury, Dept Ophthalmol, PL-10719 Olsztyn, Poland
[3] Fdn Ophthalmol Dev, Inst Res Ophthalmol, PL-61553 Poznan, Poland
关键词
artificial intelligence; bias; ethics; health policy; machine learning; natural language processing; large language model; privacy; regulation; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; MODELS;
D O I
10.3390/jcm14051605
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background/Objectives: Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming healthcare, enabling advances in diagnostics, treatment optimization, and patient care. Yet, its integration raises ethical, regulatory, and societal challenges. Key concerns include data privacy risks, algorithmic bias, and regulatory gaps that struggle to keep pace with AI advancements. This study aims to synthesize a multidisciplinary framework for trustworthy AI in healthcare, focusing on transparency, accountability, fairness, sustainability, and global collaboration. It moves beyond high-level ethical discussions to provide actionable strategies for implementing trustworthy AI in clinical contexts. Methods: A structured literature review was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Studies were selected based on relevance to AI ethics, governance, and policy in healthcare, prioritizing peer-reviewed articles, policy analyses, case studies, and ethical guidelines from authoritative sources published within the last decade. The conceptual approach integrates perspectives from clinicians, ethicists, policymakers, and technologists, offering a holistic "ecosystem" view of AI. No clinical trials or patient-level interventions were conducted. Results: The analysis identifies key gaps in current AI governance and introduces the Regulatory Genome-an adaptive AI oversight framework aligned with global policy trends and Sustainable Development Goals. It introduces quantifiable trustworthiness metrics, a comparative analysis of AI categories for clinical applications, and bias mitigation strategies. Additionally, it presents interdisciplinary policy recommendations for aligning AI deployment with ethical, regulatory, and environmental sustainability goals. This study emphasizes measurable standards, multi-stakeholder engagement strategies, and global partnerships to ensure that future AI innovations meet ethical and practical healthcare needs. Conclusions: Trustworthy AI in healthcare requires more than technical advancements-it demands robust ethical safeguards, proactive regulation, and continuous collaboration. By adopting the recommended roadmap, stakeholders can foster responsible innovation, improve patient outcomes, and maintain public trust in AI-driven healthcare.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Trustworthy AI in practice: an analysis of practitioners' needs and challenges
    Baldassarre, Maria Teresa
    Gigante, Domenico
    Kalinowski, Marcos
    Ragone, Azzurra
    Tibido, Sara
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2024 28TH INTERNATION CONFERENCE ON EVALUATION AND ASSESSMENT IN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EASE 2024, 2024, : 293 - 302
  • [32] Establishing and evaluating trustworthy AI: overview and research challenges
    Kowald, Dominik
    Scher, Sebastian
    Pammer-Schindler, Viktoria
    Muellner, Peter
    Waxnegger, Kerstin
    Demelius, Lea
    Fessl, Angela
    Toller, Maximilian
    Mendoza Estrada, Inti Gabriel
    Simic, Ilija
    Sabol, Vedran
    Truegler, Andreas
    Veas, Eduardo
    Kern, Roman
    Nad, Tomislav
    Kopeinik, Simone
    FRONTIERS IN BIG DATA, 2024, 7
  • [33] Ethical issues of digital and AI in healthcare
    Kirchner, Claude
    BULLETIN DE L ACADEMIE NATIONALE DE MEDECINE, 2025, 209 (01): : 57 - 61
  • [34] AI metrics and policymaking: assumptions and challenges in the shaping of AI
    Sioumalas-Christodoulou, Konstantinos
    Tympas, Aristotle
    AI & SOCIETY, 2025,
  • [35] Categorical Artificial Intelligence: The Integration of Symbolic and Statistical AI for Verifiable, Ethical, and Trustworthy AI
    Maruyama, Yoshihiro
    ARTIFICIAL GENERAL INTELLIGENCE, AGI 2021, 2022, 13154 : 127 - 138
  • [36] AI ethical bias: a case for AI vigilantism (AIlantism) in shaping the regulation of AI
    Nwafor, Ifeoma Elizabeth
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 29 (03): : 225 - 240
  • [37] Towards secure and trusted AI in healthcare: A systematic review of emerging innovations and ethical challenges
    Khan, Muhammad Mohsin
    Shah, Noman
    Shaikh, Nissar
    Thabet, Abdulnasser
    Alrabayah, Talal
    Belkhair, Sirajeddin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2025, 195
  • [38] Impact of AI and Dynamic Ensemble Techniques in Enhancing Healthcare Services: Opportunities and Ethical Challenges
    Javed, Haseeb
    Muqeet, Hafiz Abdul
    Danesh, Amirhossein
    Rehman, Atiq Ur
    Javed, Tahir
    Bermak, Amine
    IEEE ACCESS, 2024, 12 : 141064 - 141087
  • [39] The ethical challenges of ubiquitous healthcare
    Brown, Ian
    Adams, Andrew A.
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION ETHICS, 2007, 8 : 53 - 60
  • [40] Guidelines for Trustworthy AI application in clinical trials
    Leventi, N.
    Vodenitcharova, A.
    Popova, K.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 30