Adjuvant endocrine treatment strategies for non-metastatic breast cancer: a network meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Papakonstantinou, Andri [1 ,2 ]
Villacampa, Guillermo [3 ,4 ]
Navarro, Victor [4 ]
Oliveira, Mafalda [3 ,5 ,6 ]
Valachis, Antonios [7 ]
Pascual, Tomas [3 ,8 ,9 ]
Matikas, Alexios [1 ,2 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Oncol Pathol Dept, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Comprehens Canc Ctr, Breast Ctr, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] SOLTI Canc Res Grp, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Vall dHebron Inst Oncol, Stat Unit, Barcelona, Spain
[5] Vall Hebron Univ Hosp, Med Oncol Dept, Barcelona, Spain
[6] Vall Hebron Inst Oncol, Breast Canc Grp, Barcelona, Spain
[7] Orebro Univ, Fac Med & Hlth, Dept Oncol, Orebro, Sweden
[8] August Pi I Sunyer Biomed Res Inst IDIBAPS, Translat Genom & Targeted Therapies Solid Tumors, Barcelona, Spain
[9] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Med Oncol Dept, Barcelona, Spain
[10] Univ Barcelona, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Aromatase inhibitor; Breast cancer; Endocrine treatment; Estrogen receptor; Tamoxifen; OVARIAN-FUNCTION SUPPRESSION; AROMATASE-INHIBITOR THERAPY; TERM-FOLLOW-UP; POSTMENOPAUSAL PATIENTS; AUSTRIAN BREAST; OPEN-LABEL; CONTINUED TAMOXIFEN; PREMENOPAUSAL WOMEN; HORMONE-RECEPTORS; CONTROLLED-TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103116
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Multiple trials have evaluated escalation strategies of endocrine therapy for early breast cancer, including ovarian function suppression (OFS) and aromatase inhibitors (AI) in premenopausal patients and extended endocrine therapy. However, several aspects remain controversial due to the heterogeneity of study designs and lack of statistical power in relevant subgroups. We aimed to investigate the optimal endocrine therapy strategy. Methods A systematic literature search was performed and last updated in August 2024 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCT) evaluating endocrine treatment strategies for hormone receptor positive breast cancer. A network meta-analysis with a frequentist framework using random-effects model was used to pool direct and indirect evidence. In addition, an extracted individual patient data meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the absolute differences between treatments. Study endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. PROSPERO: CRD42023447979. Findings A total of 37 RCT that had enrolled 107,684 patients were included in the study. During the first five years, OFS + AI was the most effective strategy in premenopausal women, while AI or switch strategy showed the better efficacy results in postmenopausal ones. Following five years of tamoxifen, continuation with five additional years of AI was associated with improved 8-year DFS (85.8%) compared to no extended therapy (78.1%) or five additional years of tamoxifen (81.0%). Following five years of AI or switch strategy, extended treatment with AI improved DFS (Hazard Ratio = 0.81, 95% Confidence Interval 0.73-0.90). Interpretation This study provides information regarding the optimal endocrine treatment strategies for patients with resected hormone receptor positive early breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Apalutamide, enzalutamide, and darolutamide for non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Mori, Keiichiro
    Mostafaei, Hadi
    Pradere, Benjamin
    Motlagh, Reza Sari
    Quhal, Fahad
    Laukhtina, Ekaterina
    Schuettfort, Victor M.
    Abufaraj, Mohammad
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    Kimura, Takahiro
    Egawa, Shin
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 25 (11) : 1892 - 1900
  • [32] ADJUVANT ENDOCRINE TREATMENT OF BREAST CANCER
    Gligorov, Joseph
    Namer, Moise
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2009, 20 : 7 - 7
  • [33] Neo-adjuvant hormone therapy for non-metastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 5,194 patients
    Jimeng Hu
    Hua Xu
    Wenhui Zhu
    Fei Wu
    Jianqing Wang
    Qiang Ding
    Haowen Jiang
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 13
  • [34] ADHERENCE TO ENDOCRINE THERAPIES AMONG WOMEN WITH NON-METASTATIC BREAST CANCER IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
    Elshafie, S.
    Trivedi, R.
    Villa, Zapata L.
    Tackett, R.
    Zaghloul, I
    Young, H. N.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2024, 27 (06) : S345 - S345
  • [35] Neo-adjuvant hormone therapy for non-metastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 5,194 patients
    Hu, Jimeng
    Xu, Hua
    Zhu, Wenhui
    Wu, Fei
    Wang, Jianqing
    Ding, Qiang
    Jiang, Haowen
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 13
  • [36] Extended adjuvant endocrine therapy in early breast cancer: a meta-analysis of published randomized trials
    Ibrahim, Ezzeldin M.
    Al-Hajeili, Marwan R.
    Bayer, Ali M.
    Abulkhair, Omalkhair A.
    Refae, Ahmed A.
    MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 34 (07)
  • [37] Survival in patients with non-metastatic breast cancer treated with adjuvant trastuzumab in clinical practice
    Gallagher, Christopher M.
    More, Kenneth
    Masaquel, Anthony
    Kamath, Tripthi
    Guerin, Annie
    Ionescu-Ittu, Raluca
    Nitulescu, Roy
    Gauthier-Loiselle, Marjolaine
    Sicignano, Nicholas
    Butts, Elizabeth
    Wu, Eric Q.
    Barnett, Brian
    SPRINGERPLUS, 2016, 5
  • [38] Extended adjuvant endocrine therapy in early breast cancer: a meta-analysis of published randomized trials
    Ezzeldin M. Ibrahim
    Marwan R. Al-Hajeili
    Ali M. Bayer
    Omalkhair A. Abulkhair
    Ahmed A. Refae
    Medical Oncology, 2017, 34
  • [39] Toxicity of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Amir, Eitan
    Seruga, Bostjan
    Niraula, Saroj
    Carlsson, Lindsay
    Ocana, Alberto
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2011, 103 (17): : 1299 - 1309
  • [40] Apparent diffusion coefficient cannot discriminate metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis
    Alexey Surov
    Hans-Jonas Meyer
    Maciej Pech
    Maciej Powerski
    Jasan Omari
    Andreas Wienke
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2021, 36 : 2189 - 2197