Patient Characteristics to Inform Military Medical Evacuation Decision-Making in Mild Isolated Head Injury

被引:0
|
作者
Eisenhauer, Ian F. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Finck, Lani L. [1 ]
Dixon, Julia M. [1 ,4 ]
Schauer, Steven G. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Tadlock, Matthew D. [6 ,7 ,8 ]
de Vries, Shaheem [9 ]
Lategan, Hendrick [10 ]
Stassen, Willem [11 ]
Wylie, Craig [12 ]
Mould-Millman, Nee-Kofi [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[2] Denver Hlth & Hosp Author, Dept Emergency Med, Denver, CO 80204 USA
[3] Navy Med Leader & Profess Dev Command, Bethesda, MD 20889 USA
[4] Univ Colorado, Ctr Combat Med & Battlefield COMBAT Res, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[5] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[6] Uniformed Serv Univ Hlth Sci, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
[7] Surface Med Grp Pacific, San Diego, CA 92136 USA
[8] Joint Trauma Syst Comm Tact Combat Casualty Care, Ft Sam Houston, CA USA
[9] Collaborat Emergency Care Africa, Pretoria, South Africa
[10] Stellenbosch Univ, Div Surg, ZA-7602 Cape Town, South Africa
[11] Univ Cape Town, ZA-7701 Cape Town, South Africa
[12] Emergency Med Serv, Western Cape Govt Hlth & Wellness, ZA-8000 Cape Town, South Africa
关键词
TRAUMATIC BRAIN-INJURY; SYSTOLIC BLOOD-PRESSURE; AFGHANISTAN; MORTALITY; TRENDS; IRAQ;
D O I
10.1093/milmed/usaf058
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Management of head trauma in austere military environments is challenging as current head injury scoring systems have limited triage utility in the absence of advanced imaging. Additionally, unlike the recent past, future conflicts will be characterized by limited opportunities for aeromedical evacuation. We hypothesize that safe hospital discharge within 48 h may be an effective surrogate endpoint to identify patients appropriate for averted or delayed evacuation in military settings. To analyze this, we assess mild head-injured patients for associations between clinical factors and serious head injury patterns or hospital discharge within 48 h. Materials and Methods: This is a secondary analysis of case data collected in a DoD-funded study, "EpiC," a prospective, multicenter cohort study of major trauma in the Western Cape, South Africa, with median time to definitive care of 12.5 h. Patients aged 18-50 years who presented from March 2021 to October 2023 with mild head injury, defined as lowest Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) >= 14 in the first 24 h, were eligible. Exclusions include any nonminor injury outside the head (Abbreviated Injury Scale score >1). Serious head injury was defined as nonnasal bone facial fractures, skull fractures, or intracranial injury. Clinical characteristics were evaluated for association with serious head injury or hospital discharge before 48 h, calculated as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals. Results: We identified 2031 patients among whom: the mechanism of injury was blunt in 60%, penetrating in 30%, and both in 11%. A total of 87% of patients were discharged within 48 h. Among patients with blunt head injury, factors most strongly associated with <= 48-h discharge include GCS of 15 (89.3% of patients, OR 5.73, 95% CI 3.84-8.54) and negative or no ordered head imaging (89.3% of patients, OR 13.96, 95% CI 9.58-20.33). Combinations of factors including GCS of 14 and SBP >160 (1.6% of patients, OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.06-0.35) or SBP < 100 (2.2% of patients, OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.15-0.83) were less likely to be discharged by 48 h. Conclusions: In a military-relevant, austere, prolonged-care, civilian trauma setting, we identified factors associated with discharge after 48 h or an abnormal computed tomography head. We believe that further evaluation of individual and combinations of clinical factors may prove beneficial in imaging and transport decision-making in remote military settings.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Algorithms and medical decision-making in the management of the severely injured patient
    Waydhas, C
    Kanz, KG
    Ruchholtz, S
    Nast-Kolb, D
    EFFICIENCY AND ECONOMICS OF CLINICAL CARE AND RESEARCH IN SURGERY, 1997, SUPPL : 966 - 969
  • [32] DISCHARGE DECISION-MAKING IN A MEDICAL ICU - CHARACTERISTICS OF UNEXPECTED READMISSIONS
    FRANKLIN, C
    JACKSON, D
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1983, 11 (02) : 61 - 66
  • [33] Center the Patient in the Decision Process: A Tool to Inform the Consent and Share the Decision-Making in Patients With Rectal Cancer
    Finlayson, Emily
    Cohan, Jessica
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2016, 59 (03) : 163 - 164
  • [34] A conceptual model of emergency physician decision making for head computed tomography in mild head injury
    Probst, Marc A.
    Kanzaria, Hemal K.
    Schriger, David L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2014, 32 (06): : 645 - 650
  • [35] The Influence of Emotionally-arousing Stimuli on Decision-making in University Students with Self-reported Mild Head Injury
    Robb, Sean
    Good, Dawn
    JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 2012, 27 (05) : E36 - E37
  • [36] Understanding patient experiences to inform treatment decision-making: implications for the use of a patient-powered registry
    Buzaglo, Joanne
    Johnson, F. Reed
    Reed, Shelby
    Longacre, Margaret
    Golant, Mitch
    Miller, Melissa
    Darien, Gwen
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2015, 24 : 21 - 21
  • [37] Changes in decision-making function in patients with subacute mild traumatic brain injury
    Wang, Yuyang
    Chen, Qing
    Zhang, Xinyu
    Wang, Kai
    Cheng, Hongwei
    Chen, Xingui
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2024, 59 (01) : 69 - 81
  • [38] Cognitive models of medical decision-making capacity in patients with mild cognitive impairment
    Okonkwo, O. C.
    Griffith, H. R.
    Belue, K.
    Lanza, S.
    Zamrini, E. Y.
    Harrell, L. E.
    Brockington, J. C.
    Clark, D.
    Raman, R.
    Marson, D. C.
    JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2008, 14 (02) : 297 - 308
  • [40] Cognitive Predictors of Medical Decision-Making Capacity in Traumatic Brain Injury
    Dreer, Laura E.
    DeVivo, Michael J.
    Novack, Thonias A.
    Krzywanski, Sara
    Marson, Daniel C.
    REHABILITATION PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 53 (04) : 486 - 497