Power battery third-party reverse logistics provider selection: Fuzzy evidential reasoning

被引:0
|
作者
Zheng, Chaoyu [1 ,2 ]
Peng, Benhong [1 ]
Zhao, Xuan [1 ]
Wei, Guo [3 ]
Wan, Anxia [1 ]
Yue, Mu [2 ]
机构
[1] Wuxi Univ, Sch Digital Econ & Management, Wuxi, Peoples R China
[2] Singapore Univ Technol & Design, Engn Syst & Design ESD, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Univ North Carolina, Dept Math & Comp Sci, Pembroke, NC USA
关键词
Power battery; 3PRLPs; fuzzy belief structure; fuzzy evidential reasoning; fuzzy ranking; PARTNER SELECTION; DECISION-ANALYSIS; HYBRID MODEL; SUPPLY CHAIN; NETWORK; SWARA; RULE; SETS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Massive power batteries (PBs) are crucial to new energy vehicle enterprises. Due to Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR), the third-party reverse logistics provider selection(3PRLPs) process has become an important decision to save cost. This paper uses an innovative combination of qualitative analysis and quantitative data integration to address the PB 3PRLPs problem by using Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) and fuzzy evidential reasoning (FER). Firstly, the possible failures and potential effects in the PB 3PRLPs are identified by the FMEA to determine criteria and importance grades. Subsequently, AHP is utilized to calculate the criteria weight based on the importance of grades. FER is creatively applied to address the intersection of assessment grades and allocate the belief degree (BD) of the interaction to fuse heterogeneous data. Additionally, sensitivity analysis is done to look into the stability of the sequencing. Compared with other methods, the proposed method not only solves the subjectivity of AHP weighting but also manipulates probabilistic and fuzzy uncertainties for multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM). This method is useful in quantitatively analyzing the 3PRLPs problem and in providing auxiliary decision support for enterprises.
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 355
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Power in Third-Party Logistics
    Taha, Adnan
    Reynolds, Paul Lewis
    OPERATIONS AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2023, 16 (03): : 352 - 364
  • [22] How to choose a third-party logistics provider
    Ackerman, Ken
    Material Handling Engineering, 2000, 55 (03):
  • [23] A holistic approach for selecting a third-party reverse logistics provider in the presence of vagueness
    Efendigil, Tugba
    Onut, Semih
    Kongar, Elif
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2008, 54 (02) : 269 - 287
  • [24] Considering third-party logistics providers in reverse logistics
    Chiu, Yufang
    Lin, Po-Chao
    Hsu, He-Hsuan
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND PRODUCTION ENGINEERING, 2011, 28 (07) : 512 - 520
  • [25] Third-party logistics provider selection:: insights from a Turkish automotive company
    Gol, Hakan
    Catay, Buelent
    SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2007, 12 (06) : 379 - 384
  • [26] Multistakeholder Strategic Third-Party Logistics Provider Selection: A Real Case in China
    Wang, Jian-Jun
    Wang, Meng-Meng
    Liu, Feng
    Chen, Haozhe
    TRANSPORTATION JOURNAL, 2015, 54 (03) : 312 - 338
  • [27] A grey DEMATEL approach to develop third-party logistics provider selection criteria
    Govindan, Kannan
    Khodaverdi, Roohollah
    Vafadarnikjoo, Amin
    INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS, 2016, 116 (04) : 690 - 722
  • [28] Research on Selection of Third-party Reverse Logistics Supplier Based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process Method
    Zhou, Zhanfeng
    ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, PTS 1-4, 2012, 472-475 : 3395 - 3398
  • [29] Selection of Third-party Logistics Suppliers Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets
    Li Mei
    MANAGEMENT IN COMPLEXITY SCIENCE PERSPECTIVE - THEORY, METHODOLOGY AND PRACTICE: PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPLEXITY SCIENCE MANAGEMENT (ICCSM 2010), 2010, : 131 - 134
  • [30] Reverse logistics network design model for used power battery under the third-party recovery mode
    Guan, Qian
    Yang, Yuxiang
    2020 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY (CIS 2020), 2020, : 293 - 297