Applications of Regenerative Tissue-Engineered Scaffolds for Treatment of Spinal Cord Injury

被引:0
|
作者
Bradshaw, Katherine J. [1 ]
Leipzig, Nic D. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Akron, Auburn Sci & Engn Ctr 275, Dept Biomed Engn, West Tower 244,Sumner St, Akron, OH 44325 USA
[2] Univ Akron, Dept Chem Biomol & Corros Engn, Akron, OH USA
关键词
spinal cord injury; tissue engineering; biomaterials; stem cells; environmental factors; NEURAL STEM-CELLS; HUMAN UMBILICAL-CORD; FUNCTIONAL RECOVERY; GROWTH-FACTOR; IN-VITRO; OLIGODENDROCYTE PROGENITORS; POLYETHYLENE-GLYCOL; ELECTROSPUN FIBERS; LOCOMOTOR RECOVERY; CONTROLLED-TRIAL;
D O I
10.1089/ten.tea.2024.0194
中图分类号
Q813 [细胞工程];
学科分类号
摘要
Tissue engineering provides a path forward for emerging personalized medicine therapies as well as the ability to bring about cures for diseases or chronic injuries. Traumatic spinal cord injuries (SCIs) are an example of a chronic injury in which no cure or complete functional recovery treatment has been developed. In part, this has been due to the complex and interconnected nature of the central nervous system (CNS), the cellular makeup, its extracellular matrix (ECM), and the injury site pathophysiology. One way to combat the complex nature of an SCI has been to create functional tissue-engineered scaffolds that replace or replenish the aspects of the CNS and tissue/ECM that are damaged following the immediate injury and subsequent immune response. This can be achieved by employing the tissue-engineering triad consisting of cells, biomaterial(s), and environmental factors. Stem cells, with their innate ability to proliferate and differentiate, are a common choice for cellular therapies. Natural or synthetic biomaterials that have tunable characteristics are normally used as the scaffold base. Environmental factors can range from drugs to growth factors (GFs) or proteins, depending on if the idea would be to stimulate exogeneous or endogenous cell populations or just simply retain cells on the scaffold for effective transplantation. For functional regeneration and integration for SCI, the scaffold must promote neuroprotection and neuroplasticity. Tissue-engineering strategies have shown benefits including neuronal differentiation, axonal regeneration, axonal outgrowth, integration into the native spinal cord, and partial functional recovery. Overall, this review focuses on the background that causes SCI to be so difficult to treat, the individual components of the tissue-engineering triad, and how combinatorial scaffolds can be beneficial toward the prospects of future SCI recovery. Impact Statement Traumatic spinal cord injuries (SCIs) change a patient's life instantaneously and have no long-term therapeutic treatment to reverse damage and provide functional neurological recovery. The challenge with SCIs is the irreversible damage immediately done along with secondary injuries that can develop months to years following the initial injury. The tissue-engineering triad consisting of cells, biomaterial(s), and environmental factors has the potential to provide the base for promoting neuroprotection and neuroplasticity and reconnecting the injured area with the noninjured spinal cord. Reviewing current trends in research can help inform the best path forward to create efficacious tissue-engineering scaffolds for SCI regeneration and recovery.
引用
收藏
页码:108 / 125
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Angioneural Crosstalk in Scaffolds with Oriented Microchannels for Regenerative Spinal Cord Injury Repair
    Saglam, Aybike
    Perets, Anat
    Canver, Adam Charles
    Li, Ho-Lung
    Kollins, Katherine
    Cohen, Gadi
    Fischer, Itzhak
    Lazarovici, Philip
    Lelkes, Peter I.
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 49 (02) : 334 - 346
  • [22] Angioneural Crosstalk in Scaffolds with Oriented Microchannels for Regenerative Spinal Cord Injury Repair
    Aybike Saglam
    Anat Perets
    Adam Charles Canver
    Ho-Lung Li
    Katherine Kollins
    Gadi Cohen
    Itzhak Fischer
    Philip Lazarovici
    Peter I. Lelkes
    Journal of Molecular Neuroscience, 2013, 49 : 334 - 346
  • [23] A tissue engineered scaffold seeded with human neuroepithelial cells for treatment of spinal cord injury
    Rahmani, Yasmin
    Simon, Crystal
    Schumm, Michael
    Sturkie, Carla
    West, Franklin
    Stice, Steve
    LaPlaca, Michelle
    JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2008, 25 (07) : 913 - 913
  • [24] Stereological methods to assess tissue response for tissue-engineered scaffolds
    Garcia, Yolanda
    Breen, Ailish
    Burugapalli, Krishna
    Dockery, Peter
    Pandit, Abhay
    BIOMATERIALS, 2007, 28 (02) : 175 - 186
  • [25] Tissue engineered spinal cord
    Vacanti, M
    Leonard, J
    Dore, B
    Bonassar, L
    Cao, Y
    Stachelek, S
    Yu, C
    O'Connell, F
    Vacanti, J
    Vacanti, C
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2000, 14 (04): : A446 - A446
  • [26] Comparison of the Regenerative Effect of Adipose Tissue Mesenchymal Stem Cell Encapsulated into Two Hydrogel Scaffolds on Spinal Cord Injury
    Afsartala, Zohreh
    Hadjighassem, Mahmoudreza
    Shirian, Sadegh
    Ebrahimi-Barough, Somayeh
    Gholami, Leyla
    Mohammed, Fahad Hussain
    Yaghoobi, Mina
    Ay, Jafar
    ARCHIVES OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 9 (01)
  • [27] Regenerative replacement of neural cells for treatment of spinal cord injury
    McIntyre, William Brett
    Pieczonka, Katarzyna
    Khazaei, Mohamad
    Fehlings, Michael G.
    EXPERT OPINION ON BIOLOGICAL THERAPY, 2021, 21 (11) : 1411 - 1427
  • [28] Liposomal gene delivery mediated by tissue-engineered scaffolds
    Kulkarni, Mangesh
    Greiser, Udo
    O'Brien, Timothy
    Pandit, Abhay
    TRENDS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2010, 28 (01) : 28 - 36
  • [29] Direct-write construction of tissue-engineered scaffolds
    Kachurin, AM
    Stewart, RL
    Church, KH
    Warren, WL
    Fisher, JP
    Mikos, AG
    Kraeft, SK
    Chen, LB
    ELECTROACTIVE POLYMERS AND RAPID PROTOTYPING, 2002, 698 : 351 - 356
  • [30] Improving cellular migration in tissue-engineered laryngeal scaffolds
    Wismayer, K.
    Mehrban, N.
    Bowen, J.
    Birchall, M.
    JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2019, 133 (02): : 135 - 148