Inhaled Nitric Oxide in Fibrotic Lung Disease A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled Trial

被引:1
|
作者
Nathan, Steven D. [1 ]
Rajicic, Natasa [2 ]
Dudenhofer, Rosemarie [3 ]
Hussain, Rahat [4 ]
Argula, Rahul [5 ]
Bandyopadhyay, Debabrata [6 ]
Luckhardt, Tracy [7 ]
Muehlemann, Natalia [2 ]
Flaherty, Kevin R. [8 ]
Glassberg, Marilyn K. [9 ]
Lancaster, Lisa [3 ]
Raghu, Ganesh [10 ]
Fernandes, Peter [11 ]
机构
[1] Inova Fairfax Hosp, Adv Lung Dis & Transplant Program, 3300 Gallows Rd, Falls Church, VA 22042 USA
[2] Cytel Inc, Cambridge, MA USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Nashville, TN USA
[4] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, Mem Hermann Heart & Vasc Inst, Ctr Adv Heart Failure, Cardiopulm Support & Transplantat Program, Houston, TX USA
[5] Med Univ South Carolina, Div Pulm Crit Care Allergy & Sleep Med, Charleston, SC USA
[6] Univ S Florida, Pulm Crit Care Med, Tampa, FL USA
[7] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Div Pulm Allergy & Crit Care Med, Birmingham, AL USA
[8] Univ Michigan, Dept Internal Med, Div Pulm & Crit Care Med, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[9] Loyola Univ, Dept Med, Div Pulm Crit Care & Sleep Med, Chicago, IL USA
[10] Univ Washington, Ctr Interstitial Lung Dis, Dept Med, Seattle, WA USA
[11] Bellerophon Therapeut, Hampton, NJ USA
关键词
pulmonary hypertension; interstitial lung disease; pulmonary fibrosis; nitric oxide; IDIOPATHIC PULMONARY-FIBROSIS; PRETERM INFANTS; HYPERTENSION; DIAGNOSIS; UPDATE;
D O I
10.1513/AnnalsATS.202406-662OC
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Rationale: Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) has been shown to result in benefits in moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) in patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease (f-ILD) receiving supplemental oxygen in two independent trials. Objective: This phase III randomized, double-blind, placebo- controlled study sought to validate the benefit of ambulatory iNO in patients with f-ILD requiring supplemental oxygen. Methods: Patients with f-ILD receiving supplemental long-term oxygen were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to iNO at 45 mu g/kg ideal body weight per hour or placebo for 16 weeks. The primary outcome was the change from baseline to Week 16 in MVPA assessed by accelerometry. Secondary outcomes included overall activity, 6-minute-walk distance and patient-reported outcomes. Results: 145 patients were enrolled; 75 were assigned to receive iNO and 70 placebo. The changes from baseline in MVPA at 16 weeks were-9.2 min/d (standard error, 3.51) in the iNO45 group and-3.7 min/d (3.76) in the placebo group (difference, 5.5; P = 0.265). No statistically significant differences between the two treatment arms were found for any of the secondary outcomes. A subgroup analysis of patients with an intermediate or high probability of pulmonary hypertension on echocardiography did not demonstrate any benefit. The most common adverse events reported were respiratory tract infections, but the therapy was generally very well tolerated. Conclusions: There was no demonstrable benefit to iNO in patients with f-ILD receiving supplemental oxygen in daily physical activity assessed by actigraphy, a potential novel clinical trial endpoint. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 03267108).
引用
收藏
页码:1661 / 1669
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Fluoxetine for depression in diabetes - A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial
    Lustman, PJ
    Freedland, KE
    Griffith, LS
    Clouse, RE
    DIABETES CARE, 2000, 23 (05) : 618 - 623
  • [42] Creatine Supplementation in Fibromyalgia: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
    Alves, Christiano R. R.
    Santiago, Bianca M.
    Lima, Fernanda R.
    Otaduy, Maria C. G.
    Calich, Ana Luisa
    Tritto, Aline C. C.
    de Sa Pinto, Ana Lucia
    Roschel, Hamilton
    Leite, Claudia C.
    Benatti, Fabiana B.
    Bonfa, Eloisa
    Gualano, Bruno
    ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2013, 65 (09) : 1449 - 1459
  • [43] A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Trial of Montelukast for Acute Bronchiolitis
    Amirav, Israel
    Luder, Anthony S.
    Kruger, Natalie
    Borovitch, Yael
    Babai, Ilan
    Miron, Dan
    Zuker, Miriam
    Tal, Gay
    Mandelberg, Avigdor
    PEDIATRICS, 2008, 122 (06) : E1249 - E1255
  • [44] Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of albuterol in facioscapulohumeral dystrophy
    Kissel, JT
    McDermott, MP
    Mendell, JR
    King, WM
    Pandya, S
    Griggs, RC
    Tawil, R
    Cos, L
    Langsam, A
    Martens, B
    Brower, C
    Herr, BE
    Figlewicz, D
    Forrester, J
    Downing, K
    Holloway, RG
    Hubble, J
    Kolassa, J
    NEUROLOGY, 2001, 57 (08) : 1434 - 1440
  • [45] Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of local analgesia in laparoscopy
    Einarsson, JI
    Sun, J
    Tarrant, T
    Young, AE
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 103 (04): : 21S - 21S
  • [46] Pentoxifylline in ALS - A double-blind, randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial
    Meininger, V
    Asselain, B
    Guillet, P
    Leigh, PN
    Ludolph, A
    Lacomblez, L
    Robberecht, W
    NEUROLOGY, 2006, 66 (01) : 88 - 92
  • [47] RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL OF FEVERFEW IN MIGRAINE PREVENTION
    MURPHY, JJ
    HEPTINSTALL, S
    MITCHELL, JRA
    LANCET, 1988, 2 (8604): : 189 - 192
  • [48] A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Olanzapine in the Treatment of Trichotillomania
    Van Ameringen, Michael
    Mancini, Catherine
    Patterson, Beth
    Bennett, Mark
    Oakman, Jonathan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2010, 71 (10) : 1336 - 1343
  • [49] Sorafenib in Hepatopulmonary Syndrome: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
    Kawut, Steven M.
    Ellenberg, Susan S.
    Krowka, Michael J.
    Goldberg, David
    Vargas, Hugo
    Koch, David
    Sharkoski, Tiffany
    Al-Naamani, Nadine
    Fox, Alyson
    Brown, Robert
    Levitsky, Joshua
    Oh, Jae K.
    Lin, Grace
    Song, Nianfu
    Mottram, Carl
    Doyle, Margaret F.
    Kaplan, David E.
    Gupta, Samir
    Fallon, Michael B.
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 25 (08) : 1155 - 1164
  • [50] The cult of the double-blind placebo-controlled trial
    Ellis, SJ
    Adams, RF
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 1997, 51 (01): : 36 - 39