Mandibular growth following distraction osteogenesis in children with craniofacial microsomia from a skeletal units perspective

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Xiyuan [1 ]
Zhang, Zhiyong [2 ]
Wei, Liu [3 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Plast Surg Hosp, Peking Union Med Coll, Concept Design Acquisit & Measurement Data,Dept Ma, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Plast Surg Hosp, Peking Union Med Coll, Concept Res,Dept Maxillofacial Surg, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Peking Union Med Coll, Data Anal & Article Revis, Plast Surg Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Craniofacial microsomia; Distraction osteogenesis; Skeletal unit; HEMIFACIAL MICROSOMIA; ADOLESCENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jormas.2024.102136
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: Mandibular growth following distraction osteogenesis (DO) in patients with craniofacial microsomia (CFM) remains unclear. We aimed to investigate both the short- and long-term effects of DO on mandibular growth in children with Pruzansky-Kaban type IIA CFM based on skeletal units. Materials and methods: We collected computed tomography data from 15 children with CFM preoperatively (T0), immediately after distractor removal(T1), and 4-6 years after distractor removal(T2). Measurements were taken to assess the size and orientation of the skeletal units. Linear and angular measurements were analyzed to evaluate the short- and long-term effects of DO. Bilateral differences in growth rates (GRs) for each unit between T1 and T2 were assessed. Results: Preoperatively, the affected side exhibited smaller condylar and body units than the unaffected side. From T0 to T1, there was a significant increase in the body unit and normalization of the skeletal unit orientation on the affected side. However, from T1 to T2, the GRs of the units on the affected side were significantly slower than those on the unaffected side. Although the condylar and body unit length on the affected side did not show statistically significant increases, the angular unit length decreased. Relapses were also observed in the alignment of the units on the affected side. Conclusions: Our findings suggest a potential long-term inhibitory effect of early DO on mandibular growth in children with CFM. This issue requires further attention as strategies to promote the growth of skeletal units following DO are critical for optimal long-term treatment outcomes. (c) 2024 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Clinical Outcomes in Orthognathic Surgery for Craniofacial Microsomia Following Mandibular Distraction Using CBCT Analysis: A Retrospective Study
    DeMitchell-Rodriguez, Evellyn M.
    Mittermiller, Paul A.
    Avinoam, Shayna P.
    Staffenberg, David A.
    Rodriguez, Eduardo D.
    Shetye, Pradip R.
    Flores, Roberto L.
    CLEFT PALATE CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2024, 61 (03): : 483 - 491
  • [32] Orthopedic treatment prior to mandibular distraction osteogenesis in growing hemifacial microsomia patients
    Meazzini, MC
    Mazzoleni, F
    Pricca, M
    Bozzetti, A
    Caronni, E
    2ND INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON CRANIAL AND FACIAL BONE DISTRACTION PROCESSES, 1999, : 81 - 86
  • [33] Mandibular volumetric increase following distraction osteogenesis
    Pfaff, Miles J.
    Metzler, Philipp
    Kim, Yunsoo
    Steinbacher, Derek M.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2014, 67 (09): : 1209 - 1214
  • [34] Alveolar Rhabdomyosarcoma Following Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis
    Hassan, Bashar
    Jacob, DeAsia Dominique
    Sisti, Andrea
    Zahler, Stacey
    Rampazzo, Antonio
    Gharb, Bahar Bassiri
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 31 (03) : E256 - E258
  • [35] Comparison of skeletal and soft-tissue changes following unilateral mandibular distraction osteogenesis
    Altug-Atac, Ayse T.
    Grayson, Barry H.
    McCarthy, Joseph G.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2008, 121 (05) : 1751 - 1759
  • [36] Three-Dimensional-Printed Temporal Mandibular Joint for Use in Mandibular Distraction for Patients With Craniofacial Microsomia
    Bradford, Perry S.
    Black, Jonathan S.
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 31 (08) : 2273 - 2275
  • [37] Airway Obstruction Management With Mandibular Distraction and Matthews Device in Pruzansky III Craniofacial Microsomia
    Shih, Linden
    Davis, Matthew J.
    Sequitin, Jeromie
    Abu-Ghname, Amjed
    Dempsey, Robert F.
    Truong, Tuan A.
    Buchanan, Edward P.
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 31 (03) : E277 - E280
  • [38] Mandibular distraction osteogenesis in hemifacial microsomia: Long-term follow-up
    Meazzini, MC
    Mazzoleni, F
    Canzi, G
    Bozzetti, A
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2005, 33 (06) : 370 - 376
  • [39] A Nationwide Analysis of the Impact of Craniofacial Syndromes on Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis Outcomes
    Patel, Raina Kushal
    Stanton, Eloise W.
    Bakovic, Melanie
    Mejia, Valeria
    Pekcan, Asli
    Ayala-Chavez, Cuauhtemoc
    Shakoori, Pasha
    Urata, Mark M.
    Hammoudeh, Jeffrey A.
    CLEFT PALATE CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2025,
  • [40] Bidirectional mandibular distraction osteogenesis for the treatment of goldenhar variant of hemifacial microsomia: A case report
    Walker, DA
    3RD INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON CRANIAL AND FACIAL BONE DISTRACTION PROCESSES: 2001 DISTRACTION ODYSSEY, 2001, : 575 - 581