Introduction and Systematic Review of the Good Nursing Care Scale

被引:0
|
作者
Mattila, Tuula [1 ,2 ]
Stolt, Minna [1 ,3 ]
Katajisto, Jouko [4 ]
Leino-Kilpi, Helena [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turku, Fac Med, Dept Nursing Sci, Turku, Finland
[2] Turku Univ Hosp, Turku, Finland
[3] Satakunta Wellbeing Serv Cty, Pori, Finland
[4] Univ Turku, Dept Math & Stat, Turku, Finland
关键词
health care quality; instrument development; nursing care; patient-centred care; quality of care; QUALITY-OF-CARE; PATIENTS PERCEPTIONS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERIOPERATIVE CARE; CANCER-PATIENTS; PERSPECTIVE; NURSES; PARTICIPATION; EXPERIENCES; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1111/jocn.17486
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aim(s)To provide an introduction to the Good Nursing Care Scale (GNCS) and systematically review the application of the scale in health research.DesignSystematic review.MethodsEmpirical studies published in English or Finnish in peer-reviewed journals or as a summary of a PhD thesis where the scale was used for data collection amongst patients were included. Analysis was made by using descriptive statistics, narrative analysis, and evaluation of psychometric properties.Data SourcesPubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Scopus in October 2023.ResultsA total of 26 full-text studies and summaries of PhD theses were included in the review. The GNCS has been developed systematically, and the theoretical structure has remained stable. The studies indicate a high level of patient-centered quality of nursing care. Validity and reliability evaluation and reporting were systematic in the studies and mainly indicate sufficient level. Variations between countries are not large, supporting the international use of the GNCS.ConclusionsPatient-centered quality of nursing care is predominantly at high levels. However, systematic evaluation is needed to provide longitudinal data. For that purpose, the GNCS is one potential instrument.Implications for the Profession and Patient CareSupport for the use of existing, tested instruments is encouraged to provide critical ideas for the future needs of nurse practitioners, managers, teachers and researchers.ImpactThis paper impacts researchers interested in systematic evaluation of the patient-centered quality of nursing care and for practitioners taking care of patients. For researchers, it introduces a relevant instrument, the GNCS, for analysing the quality or for comparing the quality with other instruments. For practitioners, it produces evidence of the usability of the GNCS.Reporting MethodPRISMA guided the systematic review, and the COSMIN guideline was used for quality appraisal of included studies.Patient or Public contributionNo Patient or Public contribution.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 23
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Resilience in inpatient palliative care nursing: a qualitative systematic review
    Powell, Martin J.
    Froggatt, Katherine
    Giga, Sabir
    BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2020, 10 (01) : 79 - 90
  • [42] Nursing Perspective of the Humanized Care of the Neonate and Family: A Systematic Review
    Gomez-Cantarino, Sagrario
    Garcia-Valdivieso, Inmaculada
    Dios-Aguado, Mercedes
    Yanez-Araque, Benito
    Gallego, Brigida Molina
    Moncunill-Martinez, Eva
    CHILDREN-BASEL, 2021, 8 (01):
  • [43] Nursing care for children and adolescents with epidermolysis bullosa: a systematic review
    de Araujo, Bruno Goncalo Souza
    Dantas, Ana Marcia Nobrega
    Beserra, Patricia Josefa Fernandes
    Silva, Kenya de Lima
    ACTA PAULISTA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2023, 36
  • [44] Systematic Review of the Application of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Nursing Care
    Koo, Thai Hau
    Zakaria, Andee Dzulkarnaen
    Ng, Jet Kwan
    Leong, Xue Bin
    MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 31 (05): : 135 - 142
  • [45] Electronic nursing documentation for patient safety, quality of nursing care, and documentation: A systematic review
    Wahyuni, Erna Dwi
    Nursalam, Nursalam
    Dewi, Yulis Setiya
    Arifin, Hidayat
    Benjamin, Lizy Sonia
    JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2024, 74 (09) : 1669 - 1677
  • [46] A systematic literature review of accuracy in nursing care plans and using standardised nursing language
    Johnson, Linden
    Edward, Karen-Leigh
    Giandinoto, Jo-Ann
    COLLEGIAN, 2018, 25 (03) : 355 - 361
  • [47] Nursing-sensitive indicators for nursing care: A systematic review (1997-2017)
    Oner, Beratiye
    Zengul, Ferhat D.
    Oner, Nurettin
    Ivankova, Nataliya V.
    Karadag, Ayise
    Patrician, Patricia A.
    NURSING OPEN, 2021, 8 (03): : 1005 - 1022
  • [48] GOOD WORK AND GOOD CARE IN NURSING-HOMES
    BRANNON, D
    SMYER, MA
    GENERATIONS-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY ON AGING, 1994, 18 (03): : 34 - 38
  • [50] Translations of the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index: A systematic review
    Lake, Eileen T.
    Rosenbaum, Kathleen E. Fitzpatrick
    Sauveur, Christina
    Buren, Catherine
    Cho, Priscilla
    NURSING & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2023, 25 (03) : 365 - 380