Effects of the lesion size on clinically significant prostate cancer detection rates in PI-RADS category 3--5 lesions

被引:0
|
作者
Ayranci, A. [1 ]
Caglar, U. [1 ]
Meric, A. [1 ]
Gelmis, M. [1 ]
Sarilar, O. [1 ]
Ozgor, F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Formac & Invest Haseki, Serv Urol, Estambul, Turkiye
来源
ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS | 2024年 / 48卷 / 07期
关键词
Prostate cancer; Lesion volume; PI-RADS; Screening; Fusion biopsy; PREDICT; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.acuro.2024.01.003
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Prostate cancer (PCa) ranks second among prevalent cancers in men, necessitating effective screening tools such as multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) with the prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) classification. This study explores the impact of lesion volume on clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection rates in PI-RADS 3--5 lesions, aiming to contribute insights into the underexplored relationship between lesion size and csPCa detection. Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on data from 754 patients undergoing mpMRI-guided transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) prostate biopsy between January 2016 and 2023. Patients with PI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 lesions were included. Lesion size and PI-RADS categories were assessed through mpMRI, followed by MR fusion biopsy. Results: Of the patients, 33.7%, 52.3%, and 14.1% had PI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 lesions, respectively. Lesion sizes correlated significantly with csPCa detection in PI-RADS 4 and 5 categories. For PI-RADS 3 lesions, no significant differences in csPCa rates were observed based on lesion size. However, in PI-RADS 4 and 5 groups, larger lesions showed higher csPCa rates. Conclusions: This study suggests that subgroup categorizations based on lesion volume could predict clinically significant PCa with high accuracy, potentially reducing unnecessary biopsies and associated overtreatment. Future research should further explore the relationship between lesion size and csPCa, clarifying discussions regarding the inclusion of systematic biopsies in diagnostic protocols. (c) 2024 AEU. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:526 / 531
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The disappearing PI-RADS 5 prostate lesion
    Sabarwal, Vikram K.
    Ritchie, Cayde
    Rayn, Kareem
    Turkbey, Baris
    Pinto, Peter
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 25 (02) : 9281 - 9283
  • [22] Significant Prostate Cancer in Patients with PI-RADS Category 3 Lesions: A Single-Center, Retrospective Cohort Study
    Tunc, Burgin
    Gencturk, Mert
    Akturk, Adem
    Kantarci, Fatih
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2023, 20 (05) : 329 - 336
  • [23] Clinical -Prostate cancer Multicenter analysis of clinical and MRI characteristics associated with detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in PI-RADS (v2.0) category 3 lesions
    Al Awamlh, Bashir Al Hussein
    Marks, Leonard S.
    Sonn, Geoffrey A.
    Natarajan, Shyam
    Fan, Richard E.
    Gross, Michael D.
    Mauer, Elizabeth
    Banerjee, Samprit
    Hectors, Stefanie
    Carlsson, Sigrid
    Margolis, Daniel J.
    Hu, Jim C.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2020, 38 (07)
  • [24] Development and validation of biopsy free nomograms for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer in men with PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions
    Wang, Junxin
    Chen, Mingzhe
    Guo, Shanqi
    Xu, Yong
    Liu, Liwei
    Jiang, Xingkang
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [25] Peri-lesional biopsies increase significant prostate cancer detection in men with PI-RADS 4/5 lesions; validation of the PI-RADS steering committee recommendation
    Doan, Paul
    Kim, Lawrence
    Patel, Manish
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 17 : 62 - 63
  • [26] Clinical utility of PSA density and PI-RADS for deferring biopsy for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Truong, Matthew
    Stevens, Erica
    Ward, Ryan
    Bullen, Jennifer
    Austhof, Ethan
    Valdez, Rogelio
    Purysko, Andrei
    Klein, Eric A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (06)
  • [27] Utility of Clinical-Radiomic Model to Identify Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Biparametric MRI PI-RADS V2.1 Category 3 Lesions
    Jin, Pengfei
    Yang, Liqin
    Qiao, Xiaomeng
    Hu, Chunhong
    Hu, Chenhan
    Wang, Ximing
    Bao, Jie
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [28] CLINICAL UTILITY OF PSA DENSITY AND PI-RADS FOR DEFERRING BIOPSY FOR THE DETECTION OF CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER
    Truong, Matthew
    Stevens, Erica
    Ward, Ryan
    Bullen, Jennifer
    Austhof, Ethan
    Valdez, Rogelio
    Purysko, Andrei
    Klein, Eric
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E1104 - E1104
  • [29] Clinical and Radiological Factors for Predicting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naive Patients With PI-RADS 3 Lesions
    Zhang, Zhiyu
    Hu, Can
    Lin, Yuxin
    Song, Ouyang
    Gong, Dongkui
    Zhang, Xuefeng
    Wang, Nan
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2024, 23
  • [30] MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS OF RISK FACTORS FOR DETECTING CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER IN MEN WITH PI-RADS 3 LESIONS
    Fang, Andrew
    Shumaker, Luke
    Khajir, Ghazal
    Fan, Richard
    Soodana-Prakash, Nachiketh
    Patel, Hiten
    Sprenkle, Preston
    Sonn, Geoffrey
    Punnen, Sanoj
    Gupta, Gopal
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 : E78 - E78