Effects of the lesion size on clinically significant prostate cancer detection rates in PI-RADS category 3--5 lesions

被引:0
|
作者
Ayranci, A. [1 ]
Caglar, U. [1 ]
Meric, A. [1 ]
Gelmis, M. [1 ]
Sarilar, O. [1 ]
Ozgor, F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Formac & Invest Haseki, Serv Urol, Estambul, Turkiye
来源
ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS | 2024年 / 48卷 / 07期
关键词
Prostate cancer; Lesion volume; PI-RADS; Screening; Fusion biopsy; PREDICT; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.acuro.2024.01.003
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Prostate cancer (PCa) ranks second among prevalent cancers in men, necessitating effective screening tools such as multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) with the prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) classification. This study explores the impact of lesion volume on clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection rates in PI-RADS 3--5 lesions, aiming to contribute insights into the underexplored relationship between lesion size and csPCa detection. Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on data from 754 patients undergoing mpMRI-guided transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) prostate biopsy between January 2016 and 2023. Patients with PI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 lesions were included. Lesion size and PI-RADS categories were assessed through mpMRI, followed by MR fusion biopsy. Results: Of the patients, 33.7%, 52.3%, and 14.1% had PI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 lesions, respectively. Lesion sizes correlated significantly with csPCa detection in PI-RADS 4 and 5 categories. For PI-RADS 3 lesions, no significant differences in csPCa rates were observed based on lesion size. However, in PI-RADS 4 and 5 groups, larger lesions showed higher csPCa rates. Conclusions: This study suggests that subgroup categorizations based on lesion volume could predict clinically significant PCa with high accuracy, potentially reducing unnecessary biopsies and associated overtreatment. Future research should further explore the relationship between lesion size and csPCa, clarifying discussions regarding the inclusion of systematic biopsies in diagnostic protocols. (c) 2024 AEU. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:526 / 531
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION RATES IN PI-RADS 3 LESIONS ON MPMRI: RISK STRATIFIED BY PSA DENSITY
    Huang, Karen
    Ou, Michelle
    Chaudhary, Sarah
    Hall, Simon J.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (05): : E313 - E313
  • [2] Clinical utility of PSAD combined with PI-RADS category for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Stevens, Erica
    Truong, Mathew
    Bullen, Jennifer A.
    Ward, Ryan D.
    Purysko, Andrei S.
    Klein, Eric A.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2020, 38 (11) : 846.e9 - 846.e16
  • [3] Biparametric MRI-based radiomics for prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer of PI-RADS category 3 lesions
    Lu, Feng
    Zhao, Yanjun
    Wang, Zhongjuan
    Feng, Ninghan
    BMC CANCER, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [4] PI-RADS 3 score: A retrospective experience of clinically significant prostate cancer detection
    Camacho, Andres
    Salah, Fatima
    Bay, Camden P.
    Waring, Jonathan
    Umeton, Renato
    Hirsch, Michelle S.
    Cole, Alexander P.
    Kibel, Adam S.
    Loda, Massimo
    Tempany, Clare M.
    Fennessy, Fiona M.
    BJUI COMPASS, 2023, 4 (04): : 473 - 481
  • [5] Molecular and diffusion features for identification of clinically significant prostate cancer in PI-RADS 3 lesions
    Ajami, Tarek
    Han, Sunwoo
    Porto, Joao G.
    Kimbel, Isabella
    Szczotka, Zoe
    Guerard, Timothy
    VanderVeer-Harris, Nathan
    Ledesma, Braian R.
    Acosta, Patricia Castillo
    Kryvenko, Oleksandr N.
    Parekh, Dipen J.
    Stoyanova, Radka
    Reis, Isildinha M.
    Punnen, Sanoj
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2024, 42 (11) : 370e9 - 370e14
  • [6] The impact of the relationship between lesion diameter and total core length on the detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer for PI-RADS 3 lesions
    Yakut, Emrah
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 42 (01)
  • [7] Considering Predictive Factors in the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Patients with PI-RADS 3 Lesions
    Natale, Caleb
    Koller, Christopher R.
    Greenberg, Jacob W.
    Pincus, Joshua
    Krane, Louis S.
    LIFE-BASEL, 2021, 11 (12):
  • [8] Development and Validation of a Radiomics Nomogram for Predicting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in PI-RADS 3 Lesions
    Li, Tianping
    Sun, Linna
    Li, Qinghe
    Luo, Xunrong
    Luo, Mingfang
    Xie, Haizhu
    Wang, Peiyuan
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 11
  • [9] Variation in Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Fusion Biopsy of PI-RADS 3-5 Lesions Based on Ethnicity
    Edelblute, Beth
    Aly, Ahmed
    Jing, Zhe
    Wasaymahmood, Abdul
    Watts, Kara
    Sankin, Alex
    Maria, Pedro
    Guru, Khurshid
    Aboumohamed, Ahmed
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2025, 19 (01)