Retrospective Analysis of Human Papillomavirus Genotyping and Cytology (Pap Smears) in Cervical Cancer Screening: An Institutional Experience in the State of Oregon, USA

被引:0
|
作者
Lu, Zhengchun [1 ]
Knapp, Maxwell [1 ]
Downs, Siouxzanna [2 ]
Ali, Rabeka A. [1 ]
Morgan, Terry K. [1 ]
Ruff, Heather M. [1 ]
Qin, Xuan [1 ]
Fan, Guang [1 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[2] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Off Adv Analyt, Portland, OR 97239 USA
关键词
HPV genotyping; HPV; 16/18; non-HPV; high-risk HPV; pap smear; cervical cancer screening; HPV INFECTIONS; PREVALENCE; WOMEN; WORLDWIDE; LESIONS;
D O I
10.3390/diagnostics15040419
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background/Objectives: The 2020 American Cancer Society guidelines endorse human papillomavirus (HPV) testing as the preferred method for cervical cancer screening. This study aims to evaluate the concordance of HPV and cytology findings for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) at a population level. Methods: A retrospective cohort review of cervical cytology, HPV testing, and biopsies for all patients at a single Oregon-based medical center was performed over 21 months. The performance of HPV and cytology in detecting high-grade CIN lesions was compared. Results: A total of 22,488 tests were evaluated, showing 7.5% abnormal cytology and 7.4% positive HPV. Among 574 patients who underwent co-testing and a subsequent biopsy, 345 had abnormal cytology, with 212 having abnormal biopsy results. HPV was positive in 455 cases, with 266 having abnormal biopsy results. Among 455 HPV-positive cases, there were 283, 104 and 33 cases of non-16/18, 16, and 18 types, respectively. Additionally, 35 cases had co-infection with multiple HPV types. Among the cases diagnosed as CIN3 on biopsy, 90.6% had positive HPV testing (N = 96), and 82.9% had abnormal cytology (N = 94). HPV testing demonstrated a slightly higher sensitivity (88.8% vs. 78.3%, p = 0.128) and lower specificity (27.1% vs. 48.9%, p < 0.01) compared to cytology for CIN2 and CIN3 diagnosis. Conclusions: HPV testing showed a similar sensitivity but lower specificity compared to cytology for detecting high-grade lesions.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Modeling the Balance of Benefits and Harms of Cervical Cancer Screening with Cytology and Human Papillomavirus Testing
    Malagon, Talia
    Mayrand, Marie-Helene
    Ogilvie, Gina
    Gotlieb, Walter H.
    Blake, Jennifer
    Bouchard, Celine
    Franco, Eduardo L.
    Kulasingam, Shalini
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2020, 29 (07) : 1436 - 1446
  • [32] Impact of Pap Test Compliance and Cervical Cancer Screening Intervals on Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Acceptance
    Ferris, Daron G.
    Waller, Jennifer
    Dickinson, Ashley
    McCracken, Courtney
    Goebel, Angela
    JOURNAL OF LOWER GENITAL TRACT DISEASE, 2012, 16 (01) : 39 - 44
  • [33] Trends of Human Papillomavirus Testing in Cervical Cancer Screening at a Large Academic Cytology Laboratory
    Phelan, Darcy F.
    Boitnott, John K.
    Clark, Douglas P.
    Dubay, Lisa C.
    Gravitt, Patti E.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 118 (02): : 289 - 295
  • [34] Should screening for cervical cancer go to primary human papillomavirus testing and eliminate cytology?
    Swid, Mohammed Amer
    Monaco, Sara E.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2022, 35 (07) : 858 - 864
  • [35] Cervical cancer screening: comparative study of human papillomavirus detection between cervical cytology and urine samples
    Song, Jinwei
    Wang, Jiandong
    BMC WOMENS HEALTH, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [36] Screening for cervical cancer using primary human papillomavirus testing and reflex cytology: A cost-effective analysis
    Schuman, S.
    Barbee, L.
    Papadia, A.
    Jimenez, E. A.
    Khanna, N.
    Mckenzie, N.
    Lucci, J. A.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 112 (02) : S19 - S19
  • [37] Cost-effectiveness analysis of liquid-based cytology and human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer screening
    Bidus, Michael A.
    Maxwell, G. Larry
    Kulasingam, Shalini
    Rose, G. Scott
    Elkas, John C.
    Chernofsky, Mildred
    Myers, Evan R.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 107 (05): : 997 - 1005
  • [38] Randomized controlled trial of human papillomavirus testing versus Pap cytology in the primary screening for cervical cancer precursors:: Design, methods and preliminary accrual results of the Canadian cervical cancer screening trial (CCCaST)
    Mayrand, Marie-Helene
    Duarte-Franco, Eliane
    Coutlee, Francois
    Rodrigues, Isabel
    Walter, Stephen D.
    Ratnam, Sam
    Franco, Eduardo L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2006, 119 (03) : 615 - 623
  • [39] Comparative analysis of cervical cytology and human papillomavirus genotyping by three different methods in a routine diagnostic setting
    Padalko, Elizaveta
    Ali-Risasi, Catherine
    Mesmaekers, Stephanie
    Ryckaert, Inge
    Van Renterghem, Lieve
    Lambein, Kathleen
    Bamelis, Mieke
    De Mey, Anja
    Sturtewagen, Yolande
    Vastenavond, Hilde
    Vanden Broeck, Davy
    Weyers, Steven
    Praet, Marleen
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2015, 24 (05) : 447 - 453
  • [40] Cervical Cancer Screening by Cytology and Human Papillomavirus Testing During Pregnancy in French Women With Poor Adhesion to Regular Cervical Screening
    Brun-Micaleff, Elisabeth
    Coffy, Amandine
    Rey, Valerie
    Didelot, Marie-Noelle
    Combecal, Jacques
    Doutre, Sylviane
    Daures, Jean-Pierre
    Segondy, Michel
    Boulle, Nathalie
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2014, 86 (03) : 536 - 545