Clinician adoption of Parent-Child Interaction Therapy: A systematic review of implementation interventions

被引:1
|
作者
Woodfield, Melanie J. [1 ]
Merry, Sally [1 ]
Hetrick, Sarah E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Werry Ctr, Dept Psychol Med, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Youth Mental Hlth, Parkville, Australia
来源
关键词
Parent-Child Interaction Therapy; parent training; behavioural parent training; parent management training; implementation; adoption; determinants; systematic review; SERVICES; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1177/26334895221082330
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) is a parent training intervention for childhood conduct problems, distinctive in its use of live clinician coaching of the parent-child dyad via a one-way mirror and discrete earpiece. However, despite a compelling evidence base, uptake of evidence-based parent training programmes such as PCIT by clinicians in routine care settings remains poor. This systematic review aimed to identify and synthesise implementation interventions that have sought to increase clinician adoption of PCIT in usual care settings.Methods We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), PsycInfo (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), Science Citation Index and Social Sciences Citation Index, and Web of Science Core Collection from inception to October 2020. Articles were included if they tested (by way of randomised controlled trials, controlled clinical trials, interrupted time series and controlled before and after trials) implementation interventions across any and all of the patient, clinician, clinic, system or policy domains. Two independent reviewers screened and selected studies, assessed risk of bias and extracted data - summarising implementation intervention components according to items from the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist ( Hoffmann et al., 2014).Results Of the 769 articles identified once duplicates were removed, 13 papers relating to three studies met the inclusion criteria - all were quantitative or mixed-methods examinations of the effectiveness of different PCIT clinician training or training-related consultation methods. A narrative description of interventions was provided, as quantitative synthesis was not possible.Conclusions Research attention has to date been focussed on the establishment of an evidence-base for PCIT's effectiveness, with relatively little attention to the dissemination, implementation and sustainment of this treatment. Those studies that do exist have focused on training methods and training-related expert consultation. Research attention could usefully turn to both adoption and sustainment of this effective treatment in usual care settings.Plain language summary In this review, we aimed to summarise what is already known about how to implement PCIT in community settings after clinicians have received training in the approach. While research relating to the implementation of other parent training programmes is interesting and informative, implementation efforts are most effective when tailored to a specific programme in a specific context. As such, it was important to review published studies relating to PCIT specifically. We identified three relevant studies, one of which is yet to publish its main implementation findings. The three studies have focused on how best to train clinicians in PCIT, including how best to provide post-training support from expert trainers. We concluded that a fruitful line for future research would be to focus on the post-training period, particularly how best to support clinicians to adopt and sustain PCIT in their practice.Systematic review registration The study was prospectively registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on 01/10/2020 (CRD42020207118).
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A review of Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT): Applications for youth anxiety
    Phillips, Sharon
    Mychailyszyn, Matthew
    CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2021, 125
  • [22] Parent-child interaction in motor speech therapy
    Namasivayam, Aravind Kumar
    Jethava, Vibhuti
    Pukonen, Margit
    Huynh, Anna
    Goshulak, Debra
    Kroll, Robert
    van Lieshout, Pascal
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2018, 40 (01) : 104 - 109
  • [23] Parent-Child Interaction Therapy: current perspectives
    Lieneman, Corey C.
    Brabson, Laurel A.
    Highlander, April
    Wallace, Nancy M.
    McNeil, Cheryl B.
    PSYCHOLOGY RESEARCH AND BEHAVIOR MANAGEMENT, 2017, 10 : 239 - 256
  • [24] Parent-child interaction therapy: Adding to the evidence
    Millard, Sharon K.
    Edwards, Susan
    Cook, Frances M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY, 2009, 11 (01) : 61 - 76
  • [25] Barriers to Clinician Implementation of Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) in New Zealand and Australia: What Role for Time-Out?
    Woodfield, Melanie J.
    Cargo, Tania
    Merry, Sally N.
    Hetrick, Sarah E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (24)
  • [26] Motivational Interviewing for Parent-child Health Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Borrelli, Belinda
    Tooley, Erin M.
    Scott-Sheldon, Lori A. J.
    PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2015, 37 (03) : 254 - 265
  • [27] Parent-child relationship problems in adoption
    Steck, B
    PRAXIS DER KINDERPSYCHOLOGIE UND KINDERPSYCHIATRIE, 1998, 47 (04) : 240 - 262
  • [28] Efficacy or Chaos? Parent-Child Interaction Therapy in Maltreating Populations: A Review of Research
    Batzer, Stephanie
    Berg, Teresa
    Godinet, Meripa T.
    Stotzer, Rebecca L.
    TRAUMA VIOLENCE & ABUSE, 2018, 19 (01) : 3 - 19
  • [29] Parent-Child Interaction Therapy for ADHD: A Conceptual Overview and Critical Literature Review
    Wagner, Stephanie M.
    McNeil, Cheryl B.
    CHILD & FAMILY BEHAVIOR THERAPY, 2008, 30 (03) : 231 - 256
  • [30] Parent-child interaction therapy with domestic violence populations
    Borrego, Joaquin, Jr.
    Gutow, Mindy R.
    Reicher, Shira
    Barker, Chikira H.
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY VIOLENCE, 2008, 23 (06) : 495 - 505