Machine learning algorithms to predict mild cognitive impairment in older adults in China: A cross-sectional study

被引:2
|
作者
Song, Yanliqing [1 ]
Yuan, Quan [1 ]
Liu, Haoqiang [1 ]
Gu, KeNan [1 ]
Liu, Yue [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Tech Univ, Coll Sports, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Univ Sport, Sch Athlet Performance, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
Mild cognitive impairment; Machine learning; Health promotion; CHARLS; ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE; SOCIAL-CONTROL; HEALTH; DEPRESSION; RETIREMENT; LIFE; MORTALITY; QUALITY; ANXIETY; RESERVE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jad.2024.09.059
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: This study aimed to explore the predictive value of machine learning (ML) in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) among older adults in China and to identify important factors causing MCI. Methods: In this study, 6434 older adults were selected based on the data of the China Health and Elderly Care Longitudinal Survey (CHARLS) in 2020, and the dataset was subsequently divided into the training set and the test set, with a ratio of 6:4. To construct a prediction model for MCI in older adults, six ML algorithms were used, including logistic regression, KNN, SVM, decision tree (DT), LightGBM, and random forest (RF). The Delong test was used to compare the differences of ROC curves of different models, while decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the model performance. The important contributions of the prediction results were then used to explain the model by the SHAP value.The Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) was calculated to evaluate the performance of the models on imbalanced datasets. Additionally, causal analysis and counterfactual analysis were conducted to understand the feature importance and variable effects. Results: The area under the ROC curve of each model range from 0.71 to 0.77, indicating significant difference (P < 0.01). The DCA results show that the net benefits of LightGBM is the largest within various probability thresholds. Among all the models, the LightGBM model demonstrated the highest performance and stability. The five most important characteristics for predicting MCI were educational level, social events, gender, relationship with children, and age. Causal analysis revealed that these variables had a significant impact on MCI, with an average treatment effect of -0.144. Counterfactual analysis further validated these findings by simulating different scenarios, such as improving educational level, increasing age, and increasing social events. Conclusion: The ML algorithm can effectively predict the MCI of older adults in China and identify the important factors causing MCI.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 126
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Association between apathy and satisfaction with meaningful activities in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: A population-based cross-sectional study
    Maruta, Michio
    Makizako, Hyuma
    Ikeda, Yuriko
    Miyata, Hironori
    Nakamura, Atsushi
    Han, Gwanghee
    Shimokihara, Suguru
    Tokuda, Keiichiro
    Kubozono, Takuro
    Ohishi, Mitsuru
    Tabira, Takayuki
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 36 (07) : 1065 - 1074
  • [42] Allostatic load measures in older adults with subjective cognitive decline and mild cognitive impairment: A cross-sectional analysis from the Brazilian Memory and Aging Study
    Barbosa, Breno Jose Alencar Pires
    de Souza-Talarico, Juliana Nery
    de Jesus, Maria Clara Ferreira
    Mota, Gabriel Paz Souza
    de Oliveira, Maira Okada
    Cassimiro, Luciana
    Avolio, Isabella Maria Bello
    Tres, Eduardo Sturzeneker
    Borges, Conrado Regis
    Teixeira, Thiago Bezerra Moraes
    Brucki, Sonia Maria Dozzi
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 243
  • [43] Prevalence of mild cognitive impairment in an urban community in China: A cross-sectional analysis of the Shanghai Aging Study
    Ding, Ding
    Zhao, Qianhua
    Guo, Qihao
    Meng, Haijiao
    Wang, Bei
    Luo, Jianfeng
    Mortimer, James A.
    Borenstein, Amy R.
    Hong, Zhen
    ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA, 2015, 11 (03) : 300 - 309
  • [44] Association of empty nest and group activity with cognitive impairment in Chinese older adults: A cross-sectional study
    Zhai, Yujia
    Zhang, Tao
    Li, Qiuyue
    Lin, Junfen
    Wang, Xinyi
    Li, Fudong
    Gu, Xue
    Wu, Mengna
    He, Fan
    ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS, 2020, 90
  • [45] Hearing impairment is associated with cognitive function in community-dwelling older adults: A cross-sectional study
    Saji, Naoki
    Makizako, Hyuma
    Suzuki, Hiroyuki
    Nakai, Yuki
    Tabira, Takayuki
    Obuchi, Shuichi
    Kawai, Hisashi
    Murotani, Kenta
    Katayama, Naomi
    Toba, Kenji
    Uchida, Yasue
    Nakashima, Tsutomu
    ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS, 2021, 93
  • [46] Tooth Loss, Cognitive Impairment and Fall Risk: A Cross-Sectional Study of Older Adults in Rural Thailand
    Turnbull, Niruwan
    Cherdsakul, Pichayasuda
    Chanaboon, Sutin
    Hughes, David
    Tudpor, Kukiat
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (23)
  • [47] The relationship between metacognitive processes and cognitive performances in older adults with no significant impairment: a cross-sectional study
    Kurnaz, Samet
    Durmaz, Onur
    PSYCHOGERIATRICS, 2024, 24 (02) : 322 - 328
  • [48] Prevalence and correlates of vision impairment and its association with cognitive impairment among older adults in India: a cross-sectional study
    Muhammad, T.
    Drishti, Drishti
    Srivastava, Shobhit
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (05):
  • [49] RAGE and AGEs in Mild Cognitive Impairment of Diabetic Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Wang, Pin
    Huang, Rong
    Lu, Sen
    Xia, Wenqing
    Cai, Rongrong
    Sun, Haixia
    Wang, Shaohua
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (01):
  • [50] Reduced Walking Speed in Subjective and Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Knapstad, Mari Kalland
    Steihaug, Ole Martin
    Aaslund, Mona Kristin
    Nakling, Arne
    Naterstad, Ingvill Fjell
    Fladby, Tormod
    Aarsland, Dag
    Giil, Lasse Melvaer
    JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2019, 42 (03) : E122 - E128