Comparative Analysis of Proximal Tubule Cell Sources for In Vitro Studies of Renal Proximal Tubule Toxicity

被引:0
|
作者
Sakolish, Courtney [1 ]
Tsai, Han-Hsuan D. [1 ]
Lin, Hsing-Chieh [1 ]
Bajaj, Piyush [2 ]
Villenave, Remi [3 ]
Ferguson, Stephen S. [4 ]
Stanko, Jason P. [4 ]
Becker, Richard A. [5 ]
Hewitt, Philip [6 ]
Chiu, Weihsueh A. [1 ]
Rusyn, Ivan [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Vet Physiol & Pharmacol, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Sanofi, Global Invest Toxicol, Preclin Safety, Cambridge, MA 02141 USA
[3] F Hoffmann La Roche Ltd, Roche Innovat Ctr Basel, Roche Pharm Res & Early Dev, CH-4070 Basel, Switzerland
[4] NIEHS, Div Natl Toxicol Program, NIH, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
[5] Amer Chem Council, Washington, DC 20002 USA
[6] Merck Healthcare KGaA, Chem & Preclin Safety, D-64293 Darmstadt, Germany
基金
美国国家环境保护局; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
kidney toxicity; in vitro models; model-omics; DRUG-INDUCED NEPHROTOXICITY; MEMBRANE TRANSPORTERS; INHIBITOR; SYSTEMS; DAPAGLIFLOZIN; POTENT; LINE;
D O I
10.3390/biomedicines13030563
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background/Objectives: The kidneys are essential for eliminating drugs and chemicals from the human body and renal epithelial cells are particularly vulnerable to damage caused by xenobiotics and their metabolites. Drug-induced kidney toxicity is a major cause of drug attrition during preclinical and clinical development and the ability to predict renal toxicity remains a pressing challenge, necessitating more predictive in vitro models. However, the abundance of commercially available renal proximal tubule epithelial cell (RPTEC) sources complicates the selection of the most predictive cell types. Methods: This study compared a wide range of RPTEC sources, including primary cells (Lonza) and various RPTEC lines from different vendors, such as ciPTECs (Cell4Pharma), TERT1/RPTECs (ATCC), and HEK293 (GenoMembrane), including OAT1-overexpressing variants. HepG2 cells were included for a comparison of organ specificity. The different cells were cultured in 96- or 384-well plates and exposed to 12 drugs for 72 h at a concentration yielding a response (0.3-300 mu M) to evaluate their ability to predict clinical outcomes. The CellTiterGlo (R) assay was used to measure cell viability, and transcriptome data from unexposed cells was analyzed using the TempO-seq (R) S1500+ platform. Results: Gene expression data showed that the primary kidney cells most closely matched the transcriptome of the human kidney medulla, followed by the TERT1 and ciPTEC lines, with the HEK lines showing the lowest similarity. The RPTEC sources showed clustering by cell type, with OAT1 overexpression driving changes in metabolic, detoxification, and immune pathways, especially in TERT1 cells. Cell viability data were used to determine points of departure (PODs) which were compared to human serum Cmax values to assess safety margins. The TERT1 and ciPTEC RPTEC lines demonstrated the highest predictive performance for nephrotoxicity, with OAT1 overexpression significantly enhancing sensitivity, accuracy, and overall predictive power (MCC scores: 0.764 and 0.667, respectively). In contrast, HepG2 cells showed the lowest performance across all metrics, highlighting the critical role of cell type and transporter expression in nephrotoxicity prediction. Conclusions: This study highlights important differences among RPTEC sources and their utility in drug safety studies of the renal proximal tubule. We show that while improved cell options for renal proximal tubule are needed, OAT1-overexpressing RPTECs are a superior model to the background cell type.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] CHLORIDE TRANSPORT IN THE PROXIMAL RENAL TUBULE
    SCHILD, L
    GIEBISCH, G
    GREEN, R
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1988, 50 : 97 - 110
  • [22] RENAL PROXIMAL TUBULE RESPONSE TO ACID
    ALPERN, RJ
    YAMAJI, Y
    AMEMIYA, M
    CANE, A
    PREISIG, PA
    MILLER, RT
    MOE, OW
    NEWS IN PHYSIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1995, 10 : 77 - 81
  • [23] STUDIES OF NEPHROTOXIC AGENTS IN AN IMPROVED RENAL PROXIMAL TUBULE SYSTEM
    TYSON, CA
    DABBS, JE
    COHEN, PM
    GREEN, CE
    MELNICK, RL
    TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO, 1990, 4 (4-5) : 403 - 408
  • [24] ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL STUDIES OF PROSTAGLANDIN ACTION ON RAT RENAL PROXIMAL TUBULE
    SAMARZIJA, I
    FROMTER, E
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 1986, 24 (09): : 690 - 691
  • [25] STREPTOMYCIN TOXICITY IN PRIMARY CULTURES OF FLOUNDER RENAL PROXIMAL TUBULE CELLS
    DICKMAN, KG
    RENFRO, JL
    IN VITRO CELLULAR & DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 1990, 26 (06): : 571 - 578
  • [26] A human proximal tubule-on-a-chip to study renal disease and toxicity
    Sakolish, Courtney M.
    Philip, Brian
    Mahler, Gretchen J.
    BIOMICROFLUIDICS, 2019, 13 (01)
  • [27] The Proximal Tubule Toxicity of Immunoglobulin Light Chains
    Sirac, Christophe
    Batuman, Vecihi
    Sanders, Paul W.
    KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL REPORTS, 2021, 6 (05): : 1225 - 1231
  • [28] Differential proteomic analysis of cyclosporine A-induced toxicity in renal proximal tubule cells
    Puigmule, Marta
    Lopez-Hellin, Joan
    Sune, Guillermo
    Tornavaca, Olga
    Camano, Sonia
    Tejedor, Alberto
    Meseguer, Anna
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 24 (09) : 2672 - 2686
  • [29] TENOFOVIR ALAFENAMIDE AND PROXIMAL TUBULE MITOCHONDRIAL TOXICITY
    Ibrahim, Bassem B.
    Lamarche, Jorge
    Velez, Ana Paula
    Peguero, Alfredo
    Courville, Craig
    Antar, Marina
    Taha, Mohamed
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2018, 71 (04) : 549 - 549
  • [30] Caspase involvement in renal proximal tubule cell apoptosis.
    Wong, VY
    Keller, PM
    Nuttall, ME
    Kikly, K
    DeWolf, WE
    Lee, D
    Ali, SM
    Nadeau, DP
    Brooks, DP
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2000, 14 (04): : A581 - A581