Political ideology shapes support for the use of AI in policy-making

被引:0
|
作者
Gur, Tamar [1 ]
Hameiri, Boaz [2 ]
Maaravi, Yossi [1 ]
机构
[1] Reichman Univ, Adelson Sch Entrepreneurship, Herzliyya, Israel
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, Sch Social & Policy Studies, Tel Aviv, Israel
来源
FRONTIERS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | 2024年 / 7卷
关键词
artificial intelligence (AI); political ideology; artificial intelligence in governance; technology acceptance; governance; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; BIAS; CONSERVATIVES; PERSONALITY; ACCEPTANCE; CHATGPT; IMPACT; CARE;
D O I
10.3389/frai.2024.1447171
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In a world grappling with technological advancements, the concept of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in governance is becoming increasingly realistic. While some may find this possibility incredibly alluring, others may see it as dystopian. Society must account for these varied opinions when implementing new technologies or regulating and limiting them. This study (N = 703) explored Leftists' (liberals) and Rightists' (conservatives) support for using AI in governance decision-making amidst an unprecedented political crisis that washed through Israel shortly after the proclamation of the government's intentions to initiate reform. Results indicate that Leftists are more favorable toward AI in governance. While legitimacy is tied to support for using AI in governance among both, Rightists' acceptance is also tied to perceived norms, whereas Leftists' approval is linked to perceived utility, political efficacy, and warmth. Understanding these ideological differences is crucial, both theoretically and for practical policy formulation regarding AI's integration into governance.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] JUDICIAL POLICY-MAKING - POLITICAL ROLE OF COURTS - SCHUBERT,G
    WEINSTEIN, L
    ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, 1966, 366 (JUL): : 163 - 164
  • [42] The Political Agenda and Policy-Making: The Case of Emigration from Israel
    Friedberg, A.
    Kfir, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2008, 31 (08) : 819 - 844
  • [44] POLITICAL ROLE OF COURTS - JUDICIAL POLICY-MAKING - SCHUBERT,G
    PURYEAR, PL
    AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1966, 31 (05) : 739 - 740
  • [45] Policy and constituency frames in the advocacy of political parties and interest groups in policy-making
    Wonka, Arndt
    JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 2024, 31 (02) : 352 - 373
  • [46] Online Communities Support Policy-Making: The Need for Data Analysis
    Klinger, Roman
    Senger, Philipp
    Madan, Sumit
    Jacovi, Michal
    ELECTRONIC PARTICIPATION, EPART 2012, 2012, 7444 : 132 - 143
  • [47] Addressing key ecological questions to support policy-making in Brazil
    Almeida, R. M.
    Pinto, V. G.
    Castro, M. M.
    Divino, A. C.
    Alves, A. C. A.
    Vasconcelos, D.
    Magalhaes Silva, M. R.
    Mamede, N.
    Lima, R. N. S.
    Mello, R. M.
    Siviero, T. S.
    Martins, T.
    Campos, V
    Conde, B. E.
    Brito, P. S.
    Favoreto, F. C.
    Vidal, L. O.
    Roland, F.
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF BIOLOGY, 2013, 73 (02) : 455 - 456
  • [48] The Use of Technical Knowledge in European Water Policy-Making
    van Overveld, Perry J. M.
    Hermans, Leon M.
    Verliefde, Arne R. D.
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND GOVERNANCE, 2010, 20 (05) : 322 - 335
  • [49] Research challenges for the use of big data in policy-making
    Mureddu, Francesco
    Schmeling, Juliane
    Kanellou, Eleni
    TRANSFORMING GOVERNMENT- PEOPLE PROCESS AND POLICY, 2020, 14 (04) : 593 - 604
  • [50] Evolution of industrial policy-making in support of innovation: the case of Singapore
    Goh, Andrew L. S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION AND LEARNING, 2006, 3 (01) : 110 - 125