NanoDet Model-Based Tracking and Inspection of Net Cage Using ROV

被引:0
|
作者
Wu, Yinghao [1 ]
Wei, Yaoguang [2 ]
Zhang, Hongchao [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] China North Vehicle Res Inst, 4 Huaishuling Courtyard, Beijing 100072, Peoples R China
[2] China Agr Univ, Coll Informat & Elect Engn, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[3] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Mech Sci & Engn, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
关键词
damage detection of the net; deep learning; NanoDet; ROV tracking; sonar image target detection; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1155/are/7715838
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Open sea cage culture has become a major trend in mariculture, with strong wind resistance, wave resistance, anti-current ability, high degree of intensification, breeding density, and high yield. However, damage to the cage triggers severe economic losses; hence, to adopt effective and timely measures in minimizing economic losses, it is crucial for farmers to identify and understand the damage to the cage without delay. Presently, the damage detection of nets is mainly achieved by the underwater operation of divers, which is highly risky, inefficient, expensive, and exhibits poor real-time performance. Here, a remote-operated vehicle (ROV)-based autonomous net detection method is proposed. The system comprises two parts: the first part is sonar image target detection based on NanoDet. The sonar constantly collects data in the front and middle parts of the ROV, and the trained NanoDet model is embedded into the ROV control end, with the actual output of the angle and distance information between the ROV and net. The second part is the control part of the robot. The ROV tracks the net coat based on the angle and distance information of the target detection. In addition, when there are obstacles in front of the ROV, or it is far away from the net, the D-STAR algorithm is adopted to realize local path planning. Experimental results indicate that the NanoDet target detection exhibits an average accuracy of 77.2% and a speed of approximately 10 fps, which satisfies the requirements of ROV tracking accuracy and speed. The average tracking error of ROV inspection is less than 0.5 m. The system addresses the problem of high risk and low efficiency of the manual detection of net damage in large-scale marine cage culture and can further analyze and predict the images and videos returned from the net. .
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Model-Based Inspection Gains Traction in QA
    Waurzyniak, Patrick
    MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING, 2016, 156 (06): : 74 - 81
  • [22] Model-based tracking for autonomous arrays
    Porter, MB
    Hursky, P
    Tiemann, CO
    Stevenson, M
    OCEANS 2001 MTS/IEEE: AN OCEAN ODYSSEY, VOLS 1-4, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2001, : 786 - 792
  • [23] Interactive model-based vehicle tracking
    Gardner, WF
    Lawton, DT
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 1996, 18 (11) : 1115 - 1121
  • [24] Probabilistic Model-Based Cell Tracking
    Kachouie, Nezamoddin N.
    Fieguth, Paul
    Ramunas, John
    Jervis, Eric
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL IMAGING, 2006, 2006
  • [25] Model-based tracking with stereovision for AR
    Najafi, H
    Klinker, G
    SECOND IEEE AND ACM INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MIXED AND AUGMENTED REALITY, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 313 - 314
  • [26] Model-based tracking of laboratory animals
    Kalafatic, Z
    IEEE REGION 8 EUROCON 2003, VOL B, PROCEEDINGS: COMPUTER AS A TOOL, 2003, : 175 - 178
  • [27] Model-based tracking of moving object
    Jang, DS
    Kim, GY
    Choi, HI
    PATTERN RECOGNITION, 1997, 30 (06) : 999 - 1008
  • [28] Model-based tracking in compressed video
    Seales, WB
    Lumpp, JE
    Yuan, CJ
    1997 IEEE AEROSPACE CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, VOL 1, 1997, : 157 - 168
  • [29] Model-Based Motion Tracking of Infants
    Olsen, Mikkel Damgaard
    Herskind, Anna
    Nielsen, Jens Bo
    Paulsen, Rasmus Reinhold
    COMPUTER VISION - ECCV 2014 WORKSHOPS, PT III, 2015, 8927 : 673 - 685
  • [30] A model-based gaze tracking system
    Stiefelhagen, R
    Yang, J
    Waibel, A
    IEEE INTERNATIONAL JOINT SYMPOSIA ON INTELLIGENCE AND SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS, 1996, : 304 - 310