Fully Automated Deep Learning Model to Detect Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer at MRI

被引:5
|
作者
Cai, Jason C. [1 ,3 ]
Nakai, Hirotsugu [1 ]
Kuanar, Shiba [1 ]
Froemming, Adam T. [1 ]
Bolan, Candice W. [4 ]
Kawashima, Akira [6 ]
Takahashi, Hiroaki [1 ]
Mynderse, Lance A. [2 ]
Dora, Chandler D. [5 ]
Humphreys, Mitchell R. [7 ]
Korfiatis, Panagiotis [1 ]
Rouzrokh, Pouria [1 ]
Bratt, Alexander K. [1 ]
Conte, Gian Marco [1 ]
Erickson, Bradley J. [1 ]
Takahashi, Naoki [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Radiol, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Radiol, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Dept Radiol, Jacksonville, FL USA
[5] Mayo Clin, Dept Urol, Jacksonville, FL USA
[6] Mayo Clin, Dept Radiol, Scottsdale, AZ USA
[7] Mayo Clin, Dept Urol, Scottsdale, AZ USA
关键词
D O I
10.1148/radiol.232635
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Multiparametric MRI can help identify clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) (Gleason score >= 7) but is limited by reader experience and interobserver variability. In contrast, deep learning (DL) produces deterministic outputs. Purpose: To develop a DL model to predict the presence of csPCa by using patient-level labels without information about tumor location and to compare its performance with that of radiologists. Materials and Methods Data from patients without known csPCa who underwent MRI from January 2017 to December 2019 at one of multiple sites of a single academic institution were retrospectively reviewed. A convolutional neural network was trained to predict csPCa from T2-weighted images, diffusion-weighted images, apparent diffusion coefficient maps, and T1-weighted contrast-enhanced images. The reference standard was pathologic diagnosis. Radiologist performance was evaluated as follows: Radiology reports were used for the internal test set, and four radiologists' PI-RADS ratings were used for the external (ProstateX) test set. The performance was compared using areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) and the DeLong test. Gradient-weighted class activation maps (Grad-CAMs) were used to show tumor localization. Results: Among 5735 examinations in 5215 patients (mean age, 66 years +/- 8 [SD]; all male), 1514 examinations (1454 patients) showed csPCa. In the internal test set (400 examinations), the AUC was 0.89 and 0.89 for the DL classifier and radiologists, respectively (P = .88). In the external test set (204 examinations), the AUC was 0.86 and 0.84 for the DL classifier and radiologists, respectively (P = .68). DL classifier plus radiologists had an AUC of 0.89 (P < .001). Grad-CAMs demonstrated activation over the csPCa lesion in 35 of 38 and 56 of 58 true-positive examinations in internal and external test sets, respectively. Conclusion: The performance of a DL model was not different from that of radiologists in the detection of csPCa at MRI, and Grad-CAMs localized the tumor.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] How many cores are needed to detect clinically significant prostate cancer on targeted MRI-ultrasound fusion biopsy?
    Lu, Amanda
    Ghabili, Kamyar
    Nguyen, Kevin
    Leapman, Michael
    Sprenkle, Preston
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (06)
  • [42] Fully automated detection and localization of clinically significant prostate cancer on MR images using a cascaded convolutional neural network
    Zhu, Lina
    Gao, Ge
    Zhu, Yi
    Han, Chao
    Liu, Xiang
    Li, Derun
    Liu, Weipeng
    Wang, Xiangpeng
    Zhang, Jingyuan
    Zhang, Xiaodong
    Wang, Xiaoying
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [43] Automated Classification of Significant Prostate Cancer on MRI: A Systematic Review on the Performance of Machine Learning Applications
    Castillo T., Jose M.
    Arif, Muhammad
    Niessen, Wiro J.
    Schoots, Ivo G.
    Veenland, Jifke F.
    CANCERS, 2020, 12 (06) : 1 - 13
  • [44] Comparison of biparametric MRI to full multiparametric MRI for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Sherrer, Rachael L.
    Glaser, Zachary A.
    Gordetsky, Jennifer B.
    Nix, Jeffrey W.
    Porter, Kristin K.
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2019, 22 (02) : 331 - 336
  • [45] Comparison of biparametric MRI to full multiparametric MRI for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Rachael L. Sherrer
    Zachary A. Glaser
    Jennifer B. Gordetsky
    Jeffrey W. Nix
    Kristin K. Porter
    Soroush Rais-Bahrami
    Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2019, 22 : 331 - 336
  • [46] Multiparametric Versus Biparametric Prostate MRI: Comparison of NPV for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Birosh, Adam
    Salinas-Miranda, Emmanuel
    Breau, Rodney H.
    McInnes, Matthew D. F.
    Morash, Christopher
    Schieda, Nicola
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2024, 222 (03)
  • [47] Radiologists' Contribution to Variation in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Men With Prostate MRI
    Naik, Sachin
    Burk, Kristine S.
    Budiawan, Elvira
    Lacson, Ronilda
    Lee, Leslie K.
    Fennessy, Fiona M.
    Tempany, Clare
    Cole, Alexander P.
    Trinh, Quoc-Dien
    Kibel, Adam S.
    Khorasani, Ramin
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 19 (12) : 1312 - 1321
  • [48] Fully automated segmentation and radiomics feature extraction of hypopharyngeal cancer on MRI using deep learning
    Lin, Yu-Chun
    Lin, Gigin
    Pandey, Sumit
    Yeh, Chih-Hua
    Wang, Jiun-Jie
    Lin, Chien-Yu
    Ho, Tsung-Ying
    Ko, Sheung-Fat
    Ng, Shu-Hang
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2023, 33 (09) : 6548 - 6556
  • [49] Fully automated segmentation and radiomics feature extraction of hypopharyngeal cancer on MRI using deep learning
    Yu-Chun Lin
    Gigin Lin
    Sumit Pandey
    Chih-Hua Yeh
    Jiun-Jie Wang
    Chien-Yu Lin
    Tsung-Ying Ho
    Sheung-Fat Ko
    Shu-Hang Ng
    European Radiology, 2023, 33 : 6548 - 6556
  • [50] Searching for prostate cancer by fully automated magnetic resonance imaging classification: deep learning versus non-deep learning
    Xinggang Wang
    Wei Yang
    Jeffrey Weinreb
    Juan Han
    Qiubai Li
    Xiangchuang Kong
    Yongluan Yan
    Zan Ke
    Bo Luo
    Tao Liu
    Liang Wang
    Scientific Reports, 7