Mechanical circulatory support for patients with infarct-related cardiogenic shock: a state-of-the-art review

被引:0
|
作者
Moller, Jacob Eifer [1 ]
Thiele, Holger [2 ]
Zeymer, Uwe [3 ]
Proudfoot, Alastair [4 ]
Hassager, Christian [5 ]
机构
[1] Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Odense, Denmark
[2] Univ Hosp, Heart Ctr Leipzig, Dept Cardiol, Leipzig, Germany
[3] Herzzentrum Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Germany
[4] Barts Hlth NHS Trust, London, England
[5] Univ Hosp Copenhagen, Cardiol, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
Myocardial Infarction; Heart-Assist Devices; INTRAAORTIC BALLOON COUNTERPULSATION; MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; TRIAL; PUMP;
D O I
10.1136/heartjnl-2024-324883
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) is a severe, life-threatening condition characterised by inadequate tissue perfusion due to the heart's inability to pump blood effectively. The pathophysiology of AMI-CS usually arises from the sudden loss of myocardial contractility, leading to a decrease in cardiac output and systemic hypoperfusion. In approximately 90% of AMI-CS cases, the left ventricle is the primary site of dysfunction. Despite early recognition and the implementation of strategies such as primary percutaneous coronary intervention, the mortality rate associated with AMI-CS remains alarmingly high, reflecting significant unmet clinical needs. A major challenge lies in identifying the optimal patient population for mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices, as these interventions are costly and can lead to serious complications. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying AMI-CS, explores the current range of MCS devices available and offers an in-depth discussion on the balance of benefits and risks associated with these devices. By highlighting key evidence from recent studies, we aim to shed light on the clinical decision-making process and improve outcomes in this high-risk patient population.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Routine Early ECLS in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock?
    Leopold, Jane A.
    Taichman, Darren B.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2023, 389 (14): : 1331 - 1332
  • [22] Infarct-related cardiogenic shock - New treatment approaches
    Buerke, Michael
    ARZNEIMITTEL-FORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH, 2006, 56 (11): : 780 - 782
  • [23] Infarct-related cardiogenic shock. Prognosis and treatment
    Prondzinsky, R.
    Lemm, H.
    Geppert, A.
    Buerke, M.
    Russ, M.
    Werdan, K.
    MEDIZINISCHE KLINIK-INTENSIVMEDIZIN UND NOTFALLMEDIZIN, 2018, 113 (04) : 267 - 276
  • [24] Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock
    Freund, Anne
    Desch, Steffen
    Poess, Janine
    Sulimov, Dmitry
    Sandri, Marcus
    Majunke, Nicolas
    Thiele, Holger
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (05)
  • [25] Microaxial Flow Pump in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock
    Mallidi, Jaya
    Lotfi, Amir
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2024, 390 (24): : 2326 - 2327
  • [26] VA-ECMO for infarct-related cardiogenic shock
    Yu, Zhexuan
    Li, Guanhua
    LANCET, 2024, 403 (10443): : 2487 - 2487
  • [27] Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock
    Ferrari, M. W.
    MEDIZINISCHE KLINIK-INTENSIVMEDIZIN UND NOTFALLMEDIZIN, 2019, 114 (01) : 77 - 90
  • [28] Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock
    Jun Nakata
    Takeshi Yamamoto
    Keita Saku
    Yuki Ikeda
    Takashi Unoki
    Kuniya Asai
    Journal of Intensive Care, 11
  • [29] Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock
    Werdan, Karl
    Gielen, Stephan
    Ebelt, Henning
    Hochman, Judith S.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2014, 35 (03) : 156 - +
  • [30] Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock
    Nakata, Jun
    Yamamoto, Takeshi
    Saku, Keita
    Ikeda, Yuki
    Unoki, Takashi
    Asai, Kuniya
    JOURNAL OF INTENSIVE CARE, 2023, 11 (01)