Efficacy and safety of galcanezumab for cluster headache preventive treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
da Silva, Marina Barbosa [1 ]
Ferreira, Domenica Baroni Coelho de Oliveira
Mendieta, Cristian D. [2 ]
da Silva, Hamilcar Pereira [3 ]
Nogueira-Rosa, Livia Aguiar [4 ]
Moraes-Figueiredo, Nathalia [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Barao Maua, R Ramos De Azevedo,423, BR-14090062 Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Mayor Real & Pontificia San Francisco Xavier, Sucre, Bolivia
[3] Univ Iguacu UNIG, Nucleo Educ Distancia NEAD, Curso Redes Comp, Nova Iguacu, RJ, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Estado Rio de Janeiro, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[5] Univ Rochester, Div Gen Neurol & Headache, Neurol, Rochester, NY USA
关键词
Galcanezumab; cluster headache; monoclonal antibody; TAC; trigeminal autonomic cephalgia;
D O I
10.1080/01616412.2024.2440022
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundGalcanezumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting the CGRP pathway and represents the latest disease-specific and mechanism-based therapeutic option for cluster headache (CH).ObjectiveWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of galcanezumab for CH.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for studies implementing galcanezumab for episodic and chronic CH. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Reporting Guidelines for Meta-analyses of Observational Studies (MOOSE) guidelines. The primary outcome was efficacy, defined by a reduction from the baseline of at least 50% in the weekly frequency of CH attacks and the Patient Global Impression of Improvement scale (PGI-I). Secondary outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).ResultsA total of 504 patients were included from 6 studies, of which 2 were RCTs. The follow-up period ranged from 3 weeks to 15 months. The mean age was 44.4 +/- 10.2 years, with 24.4% female patients. Overall efficacy was 76.0% (95% CI 0.67-0.85), TEAEs were observed in 48.0% of patients (95% CI 0.25-0.72), and the most common were nasopharyngitis, local injection pain, and local injection swelling. TEAEs were, however, considerably higher within the 300 mg dose group compared with the 240 mg dose group, 80.0% (95% CI 0.65-0.87) versus 28.0% (95% CI 0.12-0.47), respectively.ConclusionThis meta-analysis suggests that galcanezumab is effective in reducing the number of CH attacks and can be considered a safe medication.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 76
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The efficacy and safety of novel oral anticoagulants for the preventive treatment in atrial fibrillation patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Guang Jian
    Wang, Yun Fu
    Chen, Ping You
    Chang, Wei
    Tu, Ming Li
    Chang, Li Ying
    Cheng, Ping
    Luo, Jie
    DRUG DELIVERY, 2014, 21 (06) : 436 - 452
  • [42] Safety and efficacy of galcanezumab in chronic and episodic migraine patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zaazouee, Mohamed Sayed
    Ebrahim, Rokaya Y.
    Al-araj, Ghaida'a
    Zaki, Ibram
    Saad, Ahmed
    Farhat, Abdullah Mohamed
    Ali, Mustafa Hussein
    Elshennawy, Mohamed
    Fawy, Omar Khaled Fahmy
    Ahmed, Hadi F.
    Alahmad, Ziad
    Nada, Eman Ayman
    Abo-Hamra, Reem I.
    Elsnhory, Ahmed Bostamy
    Eleyan, Mohammed
    AbuEl-Enien, Hazem
    Elromely, Rasha Abdo
    AbdelQadir, Yossef Hassan
    Shah, Jaffer
    Elshanbary, Alaa Ahmed
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY PSYCHIATRY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 60 (01):
  • [43] Real-world Experience with Galcanezumab for the Preventive Treatment of Cluster Headache
    Cho, S. J.
    Mo, H.
    Moon, H. S.
    Kim, B. K.
    JOURNAL OF HEADACHE AND PAIN, 2022, 23 (SUPPL 1):
  • [44] Somatosensory Profiling of Patients With Cluster Headache: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Bertotti, Gabriele
    Gil-Martinez, Alfonso
    Matesanz-Garcia, Luis
    Angulo-Diaz-Parreno, Santiago
    Rodriguez-Vico, Jaime
    Diaz-de-Teran, Javier
    Elizagaray-Garcia, Juan Ignacio
    JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2024, 25 (08):
  • [45] COMPARATIVE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF PREVENTIVE THERAPIES FOR NEUROMYELITIS OPTICA: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND NETWORK META-ANALYSIS
    Kochar, P.
    Randhawa, S.
    Singh, R.
    Goyal, R.
    Lakkakula, U. S.
    Bathla, A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2020, 23 : S329 - S329
  • [46] A systematic review on the preventive treatment of refractory chronic cluster headache
    Membrilla, J.
    Roa, J.
    Diaz de Teran, J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2022, 29 : 413 - 413
  • [47] Efficacy and safety of tigecycline: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yahav, Dafna
    Lador, Adi
    Paul, Mical
    Leibovici, Leonard
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2011, 66 (09) : 1963 - 1971
  • [48] Efficacy and safety of seprafilm: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mohri, Yasuhiko
    Kusunoki, Masato
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2008, 32 (08) : 1886 - 1887
  • [49] Efficacy and safety of bromelain: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Leelakanok, Nattawut
    Petchsomrit, Arpa
    Janurai, Thitapa
    Saechan, Charinrat
    Sunsandee, Niti
    NUTRITION AND HEALTH, 2023, 29 (03) : 479 - 503
  • [50] Efficacy and safety of cefepime: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yahav, Dafna
    Paul, Mical
    Fraser, Abigail
    Sarid, Nadav
    Leibovici, Leonard
    LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2007, 7 (05): : 338 - 348