Multi-hazard vulnerability zone identification using GIS-based fuzzy AHP and MCDM techniques

被引:0
|
作者
Sood, Atisha [1 ]
Vignesh, K. S. [2 ]
Prapanchan, V. N. [3 ]
机构
[1] SRM Inst Sci & Technol, Sch Publ Hlth, Kattankulathur, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] SRM Inst Sci & Technol, Ctr Occupat Safety & Hlth, Dept Mech Engn, Kattankulathur, Tamil Nadu, India
[3] Anna Univ, Coll Engn CEG, Dept Geol, Chennai 600025, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Multi-hazard; Urban region; FAHP; Frequency ratio; Mutli-hazard index (MHI); RISK-ASSESSMENT; FLOODS;
D O I
10.1007/s11069-025-07125-2
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The increasing frequency and intensity of natural disasters due to climate change and anthropogenic influences necessitate multi-hazard assessments in vulnerable urban areas. This study identifies potential multi-hazard zones in the Greater Chennai Corporation, Tamil Nadu, focusing on flood, cyclone, and tsunami risks. The Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchical Process (FAHP)-based Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) approach was used to determine potential hazard zones by considering individual hazards previously recorded in the study area. The three estimated hazard zones were combined using the Frequency Ratio (FR) method to calculate the Multi-Hazard Index (MHI), which was then categorized to identify probable multi-hazard zones using a geospatial platform. Various hazard-influencing factors, including topographical, meteorological, and inundation parameters, were considered in the analysis. Accuracy assessment, crucial for reliable LULC classification, showed high overall accuracy. The identified multi-hazard zones were classified into five categories: very High (17 sq. km.), High (139 sq. km.), Moderate (203 sq. km.), Low (61 sq. km.), and Very Low (3.8 sq. km.). The Moderate category exhibited the highest occupancy rate at 47.70%, while the Very Low category had the lowest occupancy rate at 0.80%. To evaluate the precision of the FAHP models, an analysis was conducted using the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve method. The results revealed an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.85, 0.82, and 0.83 for flood, cyclone, and tsunami, respectively, signifying superior model efficiency. These results provide valuable insights for policymakers in developing robust strategies for multi-hazard mitigation and disaster resilience planning.
引用
收藏
页数:39
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] GIS-based landslide susceptibility evaluation using fuzzy-AHP multi-criteria decision-making techniques in the Abha Watershed, Saudi Arabia
    Javed Mallick
    Ram Karan Singh
    Mohammed A. AlAwadh
    Saiful Islam
    Roohul Abad Khan
    Mohamed Noor Qureshi
    Environmental Earth Sciences, 2018, 77
  • [32] GIS-Based and Contributing Weight Approach for Vulnerability Mapping of Regional Landslide Hazard
    Shi Lili
    Qiao Jianping
    Wang Meng
    EBM 2010: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-8, 2010, : 4196 - 4200
  • [33] GIS-BASED SITE SELECTION FOR UNDERGROUND NATURAL RESOURCES USING FUZZY AHP-OWA
    Sabzevari, A. R.
    Delavar, M. R.
    ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCES OF THE 2ND GEOSPATIAL INFORMATION RESEARCH (GI RESEARCH 2017); THE 4TH SENSORS AND MODELS IN PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING (SMPR 2017); THE 6TH EARTH OBSERVATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES (EOEC 2017), 2017, 42-4 (W4): : 463 - 468
  • [34] GIS-based wind farm suitability assessment using fuzzy AHP multi-criteria approach: the case of Herat, Afghanistan
    Nasery S.
    Matci D.K.
    Avdan U.
    Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2021, 14 (12)
  • [35] GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using hybrid MCDM models
    Amin Salehpour Jam
    Jamal Mosaffaie
    Faramarz Sarfaraz
    Samad Shadfar
    Rouhangiz Akhtari
    Natural Hazards, 2021, 108 : 1025 - 1046
  • [36] GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using hybrid MCDM models
    Salehpour Jam, Amin
    Mosaffaie, Jamal
    Sarfaraz, Faramarz
    Shadfar, Samad
    Akhtari, Rouhangiz
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2021, 108 (01) : 1025 - 1046
  • [37] Landslides and flood multi-hazard assessment using machine learning techniques
    Youssef, Ahmed M.
    Mahdi, Ali M.
    Pourghasemi, Hamid Reza
    BULLETIN OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 81 (09)
  • [38] Landslides and flood multi-hazard assessment using machine learning techniques
    Ahmed M. Youssef
    Ali M. Mahdi
    Hamid Reza Pourghasemi
    Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2022, 81
  • [39] Advanced groundwater potential and contamination vulnerability assessment using integrated GIS-based AHP techniques: A case study from the Bizerte watershed, Tunisia
    Belhadj, Cyrine
    Riahi, Rihab
    Sebei, Abdelaziz
    Sifi, Sinda
    Rebai, Noamen
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS, 2025, 26
  • [40] PROMETHEE II and fuzzy AHP: an enhanced GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping
    Majid Shadman Roodposhti
    Saeed Rahimi
    Mansour Jafar Beglou
    Natural Hazards, 2014, 73 : 77 - 95