Inferring the morphology of the Galactic Center excess with Gaussian processes

被引:0
|
作者
Ramirez, Edward D. [1 ]
Sun, Yitian [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Buckley, Matthew R. [1 ]
Mishra-Sharma, Siddharth [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Slatyer, Tracy R. [4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Phys & Astron, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
[2] McGill Univ, Dept Phys, Montreal, PQ H3A 2T8, Canada
[3] McGill Univ, Trottier Space Inst, Montreal, PQ H3A 2T8, Canada
[4] NSF AI Inst Artificial Intelligence & Fundamental, Cambridge, MA USA
[5] MIT, Ctr Theoret Phys, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[6] Harvard Univ, Dept Phys, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[7] Harvard Univ, Radcliffe Inst Adv Study, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
DARK-MATTER; PROPAGATION; SIGNAL;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevD.111.063065
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Descriptions of the Galactic Center using Fermi gamma-ray data have so far modeled the Galactic Center excess (GCE) as a template with fixed spatial morphology or as a linear combination of such templates. Although these templates are informed by various physical expectations, the morphology of the excess is a priori unknown. For the first time, we describe the GCE using a flexible, nonparametric machine learning model-the Gaussian process (GP). We assess our model's performance on synthetic data, demonstrating that the model can recover the templates used to generate the data. We then fit the Fermi data with our model in a single energy bin from 2-20 GeV (leaving a spectral GP analysis of the GCE for future work) using a variety of template models of diffuse gamma-ray emission to quantify our fits' systematic uncertainties associated with diffuse emission modeling. We interpret our best-fit GP in terms of GCE templates consisting of an Navarro-Frenk-White (NFW) squared template and a bulge component to determine which bulge models can best describe the fitted GP and to what extent the best-fit GP is described better by an NFW squared template versus a bulge template. The best-fit GP contains morphological features that are typically not associated with traditional GCE studies. These include a localized bright source at around (l, b) = (20 degrees, 0 degrees) and a diagonal arm extending Northwest from the Galactic Center. In spite of these novel features, the fitted GP is explained best by a template-based model consisting of the bulge presented in Coleman et al. (2020) and a squared NFW component. Our results suggest that the physical interpretation of the GCE in terms of stellar bulge and NFW-like components is highly sensitive to the assumed morphologies, background models, and the region of the sky used for inference.
引用
收藏
页数:55
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Inferring probabilistic stellar rotation periods using Gaussian processes
    Angus, Ruth
    Morton, Timothy
    Aigrain, Suzanne
    Foreman-Mackey, Daniel
    Rajpaul, Vinesh
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2018, 474 (02) : 2094 - 2108
  • [22] Galactic Center gamma-ray "excess" from an active past of the Galactic Centre?
    Petrovic, Jovana
    Serpico, Pasquale Dario
    Zaharijas, Gabrijela
    JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2014, (10):
  • [23] Return of the WIMP: Missing energy signals and the Galactic Center excess
    Carena, Marcela
    Osborne, James
    Shah, Nausheen R.
    Wagner, Carlos E. M.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2019, 100 (05)
  • [24] Interpreting the galactic center gamma-ray excess in the NMSSM
    Cao, Junjie
    Shang, Liangliang
    Wu, Peiwen
    Yang, Jin Min
    Zhang, Yang
    JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS, 2015, (10):
  • [25] Hidden on-shell mediators for the Galactic Center γ-ray excess
    Abdullah, Mohammad
    DiFranzo, Anthony
    Rajaraman, Arvind
    Tait, Tim M. P.
    Tanedo, Philip
    Wijangco, Alexander M.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2014, 90 (03):
  • [26] The Fermi Galactic Center GeV Excess and Implications for Dark Matter
    Ackermann, M.
    Ajello, M.
    Albert, A.
    Atwood, W. B.
    Baldini, L.
    Ballet, J.
    Barbiellini, G.
    Bastieri, D.
    Bellazzini, R.
    Bissaldi, E.
    Blandford, R. D.
    Bloom, E. D.
    Bonino, R.
    Bottacini, E.
    Brandt, T. J.
    Bregeon
    Bruel, P.
    Buehler, R.
    Burnett, T. H.
    Cameron, R. A.
    Caputo, R.
    Caragiulo, M.
    Caraveo, P. A.
    Cavazzuti, E.
    Cecchi, C.
    Charles, E.
    Chekhtman, A.
    Chiang, J.
    Chiappo, A.
    Chiaro, G.
    Ciprini, S.
    Conrad, J.
    Costanza, F.
    Cuoco, A.
    Cutini, S.
    D'Ammando, F.
    de Palmai, F.
    Desiante, R.
    Digel, S. W.
    Di Lalla, N.
    Di Mauro, M.
    Di Venere, L.
    Drell, P. S.
    Favuzzi, C.
    Fegan, J.
    Ferrara, E. C.
    Fockes, W. B.
    Franckowiak, A.
    Fukazawa, Y.
    Funk, S.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 840 (01):
  • [27] Interpreting the galactic center gamma-ray excess in the NMSSM
    Junjie Cao
    Liangliang Shang
    Peiwen Wu
    Jin Min Yang
    Yang Zhang
    Journal of High Energy Physics, 2015
  • [28] Testing the Sensitivity of the Galactic Center Excess to the Point Source Mask
    Zhong, Yi-Ming
    McDermott, Samuel D.
    Cholis, Ilias
    Fox, Patrick J.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2020, 124 (23)
  • [29] Lining up the Galactic Center gamma-ray excess
    McDermott, Samuel D.
    PHYSICS OF THE DARK UNIVERSE, 2015, 7-8 : 12 - 15
  • [30] Discovery of a new galactic center excess consistent with upscattered starlight
    Abazajian, Kevork N.
    Canac, Nicolas
    Horiuchi, Shunsaku
    Kaplinghat, Manoj
    Kwa, Anna
    JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2015, (07):