共 21 条
Diagnostic Performance of Visionix VX120+ Platform for Dry Eye Screening
被引:0
|作者:
Martinez-Plaza, Elena
[1
,2
]
Barberan-Bernardos, Laura
[1
]
Molina-Martin, Ainhoa
[1
]
Pinero, David P.
[1
,3
]
机构:
[1] Univ Alicante, Dept Opt Pharmacol & Anat, Grp Opt & Visual Percept, Alicante 03690, Spain
[2] Univ Valladolid, Valladolid 47001, Spain
[3] Vithas Medimar Int Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Alicante 03016, Spain
来源:
关键词:
tear meniscus height;
TMH;
tear break-up time;
NIBUT;
accuracy;
Visionix;
dry eye;
screening;
TEAR FILM STABILITY;
BREAK-UP TIME;
FLUORESCEIN;
CORNEAL;
DISEASE;
VOLUME;
D O I:
10.3390/diagnostics14202276
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of diagnosing dry eye disease (DED) by using the Visionix VX120+, to establish reference values for tear meniscus height (TMH) and non-invasive break-up time (NIBUT), and to compare the NIBUT measurements with the fluorescein tear break-up time (FBUT), Methods: fifty-eight subjects (34 dry eye and 24 control) were enrolled. The TMH, first NIBUT, and NIBUT50% were evaluated with the Visionix VX120+, and the FBUT was measured with a slit-lamp. The Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance, and the Bland-Altman method was performed to analyze the agreement. Results: The areas under the curve were 0.62, 0.60, and 0.70 for the TMH, first NIBUT, and NIBUT50%, respectively. The optimal cut-off values (sensitivity, specificity) were 0.29 (0.62, 0.67), 5.05 (0.85, 0.46), and 7.35 (0.65, 0.79) for the TMH, first NIBUT, and NIBUT50%, respectively. The mean differences (lower, upper limits of agreement) were -1.10 (-8.78, 6.58) and 1.55 (-5.68, 8.78) for the first NIBUT vs. FBUT and the NIBUT50% vs. FBUT, respectively. Conclusions: In conclusion, the NIBUT50% can be a useful tool for dry eye screening, with acceptable values of sensitivity and specificity. First, the NIBUT and NIBUT50% should not be used interchangeably with the FBUT.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文