Diagnostic Performance of Visionix VX120+ Platform for Dry Eye Screening

被引:0
|
作者
Martinez-Plaza, Elena [1 ,2 ]
Barberan-Bernardos, Laura [1 ]
Molina-Martin, Ainhoa [1 ]
Pinero, David P. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alicante, Dept Opt Pharmacol & Anat, Grp Opt & Visual Percept, Alicante 03690, Spain
[2] Univ Valladolid, Valladolid 47001, Spain
[3] Vithas Medimar Int Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Alicante 03016, Spain
关键词
tear meniscus height; TMH; tear break-up time; NIBUT; accuracy; Visionix; dry eye; screening; TEAR FILM STABILITY; BREAK-UP TIME; FLUORESCEIN; CORNEAL; DISEASE; VOLUME;
D O I
10.3390/diagnostics14202276
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of diagnosing dry eye disease (DED) by using the Visionix VX120+, to establish reference values for tear meniscus height (TMH) and non-invasive break-up time (NIBUT), and to compare the NIBUT measurements with the fluorescein tear break-up time (FBUT), Methods: fifty-eight subjects (34 dry eye and 24 control) were enrolled. The TMH, first NIBUT, and NIBUT50% were evaluated with the Visionix VX120+, and the FBUT was measured with a slit-lamp. The Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance, and the Bland-Altman method was performed to analyze the agreement. Results: The areas under the curve were 0.62, 0.60, and 0.70 for the TMH, first NIBUT, and NIBUT50%, respectively. The optimal cut-off values (sensitivity, specificity) were 0.29 (0.62, 0.67), 5.05 (0.85, 0.46), and 7.35 (0.65, 0.79) for the TMH, first NIBUT, and NIBUT50%, respectively. The mean differences (lower, upper limits of agreement) were -1.10 (-8.78, 6.58) and 1.55 (-5.68, 8.78) for the first NIBUT vs. FBUT and the NIBUT50% vs. FBUT, respectively. Conclusions: In conclusion, the NIBUT50% can be a useful tool for dry eye screening, with acceptable values of sensitivity and specificity. First, the NIBUT and NIBUT50% should not be used interchangeably with the FBUT.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条