Proof of carbon reduction: A novel incentive mechanism in blockchain for carbon emissions reduction in construction

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Juan [1 ]
Li, Xiao [1 ]
Chen, Chen [1 ]
Zhu, Wentao [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Civil Engn, CI3 Lab, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Consensus mechanism; Blockchain; Carbon reduction; Incentive design; CO2; EMISSIONS; CONSENSUS; BUILDINGS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.112684
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Blockchain technology has been introduced to tackle the data issues arising from centralization in carbon management. However, current blockchain systems remain inefficient for carbon management in construction projects, falling short in scalability, security, and high throughput. Moreover, blockchain mainly serves as a database, so it is not easy to shape stakeholders' low-carbon behaviors actively and directly. Thus, this paper designs a novel incentive mechanism (i.e., consensus mechanism with incentive design) in blockchain, Proof of Carbon Reduction (PoCR), to enhance blockchain system performance and promote low carbon practices among stakeholders. To this end, carbon reduction credit (CR credit) is first proposed to evaluate stakeholders' carbon performance via the reporting and crowd-wisdom subsystems. Second, the optimized Byzantine Fault Tolerance (BFT) with a novel block leader election algorithm and a fair reward allocation method is proposed for the transaction consensus process in the blockchain to reduce communication complexity while enhancing consistency using cryptographic techniques. Third, controlled experiments are conducted and research findings show that PoCR can achieve (1) effective low-carbon incentive, providing financial returns for low-carbon performance and enhancing income fairness, (2) excellent efficiency, reducing the quadratic message complexity of typical BFT-based protocols to 0(mn), and increasing the throughput over 10 % (Delegated BFT) and 25 % (Algorand) while reducing latency over 80 % (Practical BFT) and 20 % (Algorand), (3) enhanced security, outperforming existing protocols in anti-attack and anti-corruption capabilities. This paper contributes to both blockchain design and low-carbon incentive design, paving the way for decentralized low-carbon management in construction.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Reduction of Carbon Dioxide Emissions by Mineral Carbonation
    Sturgeon, C. J.
    Rasul, M. G.
    Chowdhury, Ashfaque Ahmed
    RECENT ADVANCES IN ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2010, : 350 - +
  • [32] A healthy reduction in oil consumption and carbon emissions
    Higgins, PAT
    Higgins, M
    ENERGY POLICY, 2005, 33 (01) : 1 - 4
  • [33] Grid Expansion Planning for Carbon Emissions Reduction
    Bent, Russell
    Toole, G. Loren
    2012 IEEE POWER AND ENERGY SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING, 2012,
  • [34] The regional economic effects of a reduction in carbon emissions
    Chen, Anping
    Groenewold, Nicolaas
    Hagger, Alfred J.
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2013, 57 (04) : 483 - 500
  • [35] Investing in carbon emissions reduction in the EOQ model
    Lee, Jun-Yeon
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2020, 71 (08) : 1289 - 1300
  • [36] Reduction in carbon dioxide emissions a conceptual approach
    Khullar, RK
    Khullar, P
    GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, 2001, : 640 - 647
  • [37] ECONOMICS OF A GLOBAL STRATEGY FOR REDUCTION OF CARBON EMISSIONS
    SINYAK, Y
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT AND POLLUTION, 1995, 5 (01) : 30 - 51
  • [38] United Kingdom carbon emissions reduction legislation
    Stephens, Tim
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING LAW JOURNAL, 2007, 24 (04):
  • [39] Electricity generation: options for reduction in carbon emissions
    Whittington, HW
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON SERIES A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2002, 360 (1797): : 1653 - 1668
  • [40] Design Principles for Carbon Emissions Reduction Programs
    Stern, Paul C.
    Gardner, Gerald T.
    Vandenbergh, Michael P.
    Dietz, Thomas
    Gilligan, Jonathan M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 44 (13) : 4847 - 4848