Enhancing Value-at-Risk with Credible Expected Risk Models

被引:0
|
作者
Syuhada, Khreshna [1 ]
Puspitasari, Rizka [1 ]
Arnawa, I. Kadek Darma [1 ]
Mufaridho, Lailatul [1 ]
Elonasari, Elonasari [1 ]
Jannah, Miftahul [1 ]
Rohmawati, Aniq [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Teknol Bandung, Fac Math & Nat Sci, Bandung 40132, Indonesia
来源
关键词
risk management; Value-at-Risk; credible risk measures; forecast; GARCH; cryptocurrency; CREDIBILITY; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.3390/ijfs12030080
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Accurate risk assessment is crucial for predicting potential financial losses. This paper introduces an innovative approach by employing expected risk models that utilize risk samples to capture comprehensive risk characteristics. The innovation lies in the integration of classical credibility theory with expected risk models, enhancing their stability and precision. In this study, two distinct expected risk models were developed, referred to as Model Type I and Model Type II. The Type I model involves independent and identically distributed random samples, while the Type II model incorporates time-varying stochastic processes, including heteroscedastic models like GARCH(p,q). However, these models often exhibit high variability and instability, which can undermine their effectiveness. To mitigate these issues, we applied classical credibility theory, resulting in credible expected risk models. These enhanced models aim to improve the accuracy of Value-at-Risk (VaR) forecasts, a key risk measure defined as the maximum potential loss over a specified period at a given confidence level. The credible expected risk models, referred to as CreVaR, provide more stable and precise VaR forecasts by incorporating credibility adjustments. The effectiveness of these models is evaluated through two complementary approaches: coverage probability, which assesses the accuracy of risk predictions; and scoring functions, which offer a more nuanced evaluation of prediction accuracy by comparing predicted risks with actual observed outcomes. Scoring functions are essential in further assessing the reliability of CreVaR forecasts by quantifying how closely the forecasts align with the actual data, thereby providing a more comprehensive measure of predictive performance. Our findings demonstrate that the CreVaR risk measure delivers more reliable and stable risk forecasts compared to conventional methods. This research contributes to quantitative risk management by offering a robust approach to financial risk prediction, thereby supporting better decision making for companies and financial institutions.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] On Exactitude in Financial Regulation: Value-at-Risk, Expected Shortfall, and Expectiles
    Chen, James Ming
    RISKS, 2018, 6 (02)
  • [42] Backtesting Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall in the Presence of Estimation Error*
    Barendse, Sander
    Kole, Erik
    van Dijk, Dick
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMETRICS, 2023, 21 (02) : 528 - 568
  • [43] On Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall of Financial Asset with Stochastic Pricing
    Fomin, Maxim
    Shorokhov, Sergey
    2018 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON ULTRA MODERN TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND CONTROL SYSTEMS AND WORKSHOPS (ICUMT 2018): EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES FOR CONNECTED SOCIETY, 2018,
  • [44] Efficiently Backtesting Conditional Value-at-Risk and Conditional Expected Shortfall
    Su, Qihui
    Qin, Zhongling
    Peng, Liang
    Qin, Gengsheng
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2021, 116 (536) : 2041 - 2052
  • [45] Joint value-at-risk and expected shortfall regression for location-scale time series models
    Jiao, Shoukun
    Ye, Wuyi
    COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-THEORY AND METHODS, 2024,
  • [46] The performance of value-at-risk models during the crisis
    Skoglund, Jimmy
    Erdman, Donald
    Chen, Wei
    JOURNAL OF RISK MODEL VALIDATION, 2010, 4 (01): : 3 - 21
  • [47] Distributionally robust reinsurance with Value-at-Risk and Conditional Value-at-Risk
    Liu, Haiyan
    Mao, Tiantian
    INSURANCE MATHEMATICS & ECONOMICS, 2022, 107 : 393 - 417
  • [48] Conditional Value-at-Risk and Average Value-at-Risk: Estimation and Asymptotics
    Chun, So Yeon
    Shapiro, Alexander
    Uryasev, Stan
    OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2012, 60 (04) : 739 - 756
  • [49] Robust Backtesting Tests for Value-at-risk Models
    Escanciano, J. Carlos
    Olmo, Jose
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMETRICS, 2011, 9 (01) : 132 - 161
  • [50] Improved estimation methods for value-at-risk, expected shortfall and risk contributions with high precision
    Muromachi, Yukio
    JOURNAL OF RISK, 2015, 17 (06): : 1 - 27