Sparse Bayesian Networks: Efficient Uncertainty Quantification in Medical Image Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Abboud, Zeinab [1 ,2 ]
Lombaert, Herve [1 ,2 ]
Kadoury, Samuel [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Polytech Montreal, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] Mila, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] CHUM Hosp Res Ctr, Montreal, PQ, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Uncertainty; Sparsity; Sensitivty Analysis; Bayesian Networks; Segmentation; Classification; NEURAL-NETWORKS;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-031-72117-5_63
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Efficiently quantifying predictive uncertainty in medical images remains a challenge. While Bayesian neural networks (BNN) offer reliable predictive uncertainty, they require substantial computational resources to train. Although Bayesian approximations such as ensembles have shown promise, they still suffer from high training costs. Existing approaches to reducing computational burden primarily focus on lowering the costs of BNN inference, with limited efforts to improve training efficiency and minimize parameter complexity. This study introduces a training procedure for a sparse (partial) Bayesian network. Our method selectively assigns a subset of parameters as Bayesian by assessing their deterministic saliency through gradient sensitivity analysis. The resulting network combines deterministic and Bayesian parameters, exploiting the advantages of both representations to achieve high task-specific performance and minimize predictive uncertainty. Demonstrated on multi-label ChestMNIST for classification and ISIC, LIDC-IDRI for segmentation, our approach achieves competitive performance and predictive uncertainty estimation by reducing Bayesian parameters by over 95%, significantly reducing computational expenses compared to fully Bayesian and ensemble methods.
引用
收藏
页码:675 / 684
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Uncertainty quantification analysis with sparse polynomial chaos method
    Chen J.
    Zhang C.
    Liu X.
    Zhao H.
    Hu X.
    Wu X.
    Hangkong Xuebao/Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2020, 41 (03):
  • [22] Bayesian analysis for uncertainty quantification of in situ stress data
    Feng, Yu
    Bozorgzadeh, Nezam
    Harrison, John P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 2020, 134
  • [23] Efficient Bayesian Learning of Sparse Deep Artificial Neural Networks
    Fakhfakh, Mohamed
    Bouaziz, Bassem
    Chaari, Lotfi
    Gargouri, Faiez
    ADVANCES IN INTELLIGENT DATA ANALYSIS XX, IDA 2022, 2022, 13205 : 78 - 88
  • [24] A review of uncertainty quantification in medical image analysis: Probabilistic and non-probabilistic methods
    Huang, Ling
    Ruan, Su
    Xing, Yucheng
    Feng, Mengling
    MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2024, 97
  • [25] Efficient Bayesian estimation and uncertainty quantification in ordinary differential equation models
    Bhaumik, Prithwish
    Ghosal, Subhashis
    BERNOULLI, 2017, 23 (4B) : 3537 - 3570
  • [26] Bayesian-based response expansion and uncertainty quantification using sparse measurement sets
    Lopp, Garrett K.
    Schultz, Ryan
    MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2022, 169
  • [27] Uncertainty Quantification for Bayesian Optimization
    Tuo, Rui
    Wang, Wenjia
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND STATISTICS, VOL 151, 2022, 151
  • [28] Uncertainty quantification in Bayesian inversion
    Stuart, Andrew M.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF MATHEMATICIANS (ICM 2014), VOL IV, 2014, : 1145 - 1162
  • [29] Uncertainty Quantification in Inverse Scattering Problems With Bayesian Convolutional Neural Networks
    Wei, Zhun
    Chen, Xudong
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, 2021, 69 (06) : 3409 - 3418
  • [30] Density regression and uncertainty quantification with Bayesian deep noise neural networks
    Zhang, Daiwei
    Liu, Tianci
    Kang, Jian
    STAT, 2023, 12 (01):