High-Adherence Dichoptic Treatment Versus Patching in Anisometropic and Small Angle Strabismus Amblyopia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:1
|
作者
Wygnanski-Jaffe, Tamara [1 ,2 ]
Kushner, Burton J. [3 ]
Moshkovitz, Avital [4 ]
Belkin, Michael [1 ,2 ]
Yehezkel, Oren [4 ]
机构
[1] Goldschleger Eye Inst, Sheba Med Ctr, Tel Hashomer, Israel
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, Fac Med, Tel Aviv, Israel
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Madison, WI USA
[4] NovaSight Ltd, 1 Hayarden St, IL-7019801 Airport City, Israel
关键词
BINOCULAR IPAD GAME; OCCLUSION TREATMENT; MODERATE AMBLYOPIA; OPTIMAL DURATION; DOSE-RESPONSE; RISK-FACTORS; CHILDREN; THERAPY; EFFICACY; ATROPINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajo.2024.08.011
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
center dot PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of a novel binocular eye-tracking-based-home-treatment (CureSight) to patching for the treatment of amblyopia. center dot DESIGN: Prospective, masked, multicenter randomized controlled trial. center dot METHODS: One hundred forty-nine children 4 to < 9 years with anisometropic, small-angle strabismic, or mixed-mechanism amblyopia were randomized to either binocular dichoptic treatment (n = 75) or patching (n = 74). The binocular dichoptic treatment group used the CureSight system for 90 min/day, 5 days/week for 16 weeks (120 hours). The patching group received 2-hour patching 7 days/week (224 hours). The primary outcome was the mean improvement from baseline in amblyopic eye visual acuity (VA) to week 16 in both study groups (non-inferiority of <= 0.10 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]). center dot RESULTS: In the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) group, the mean improvement from baseline at week 16 in the binocular treatment group was noninferior to patchto 0.076]). In the per-protocol (PP) dataset, the mean improvement from baseline at week 16 in the binocular treatment group was superior to patching group improvement (0.05 logMAR ([95% CI; 0.007 to 0.097]). There was no significant between-group difference in the magnitude of improvement in stereoacuity in the mITT and the PP datasets. Median adherence in the mITT binocular treatment group (94.0%) was also significantly higher than in the patching group (83.9%; p = 0.0038). better visual outcomes than, patching in children with center dot Conclusions:<bold> </bold>A binocular, eye-tracking-based amblyopia home treatment is noninferior to, and produced better visual outcomes than, patching in children with anisometropic, small angle strabismus and mixed mechanism amblyopia. (Am J Ophthalmol 2025;269: 293- 302. (c) 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ ))
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 302
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Clonidine versus captopril for treatment of postpartum very high blood pressure: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (CLONCAP)
    Carlos Noronha-Neto
    Leila Katz
    Isabela C Coutinho
    Sabina B Maia
    Alex Sandro Rolland Souza
    Melania Maria Ramos Amorim
    Reproductive Health, 10
  • [32] Treatment of Rectal Fecal Impaction a Randomized Controlled Trial: Rectal Enemas Versus High Doses of Oral PEG 3350
    Bekkali, Noor L.
    Dijkgraaf, Marcel G.
    van den Berg, Maartje M.
    van Wijk, Michiel P.
    Bongers, Marloes E.
    Liem, Olivia
    Benninga, Marc A.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 136 (05) : A128 - A129
  • [33] Mechanochemical endovenous ablation versus radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of primary small saphenous vein insufficiency (MESSI trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Doeke Boersma
    Ramon RJP van Eekeren
    Hans JC Kelder
    Debora AB Werson
    Suzanne Holewijn
    Michiel A Schreve
    Michel MPJ Reijnen
    Jean Paul PM de Vries
    Trials, 15
  • [34] Mechanochemical endovenous ablation versus radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of primary small saphenous vein insufficiency (MESSI trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Boersma, Doeke
    van Eekeren, Ramon R. J. P.
    Kelder, Hans J. C.
    Werson, Debora A. B.
    Holewijn, Suzanne
    Schreve, Michiel A.
    Reijnen, Michel M. P. J.
    de Vries, Jean Paul P. M.
    TRIALS, 2014, 15
  • [35] A pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) of daily versus weekly interactive voice response calls to support adherence among antiretroviral treatment patients in India
    Swendeman, Dallas
    Fehrenbacher, Anne E.
    Roy, Soma
    Ray, Protim
    Sumstine, Stephanie
    Scheffler, Aaron
    Das, Rishi
    Jana, Smaraijt
    MHEALTH, 2020, 6 (04)
  • [36] High-intensity versus low-level laser therapy in the treatment of patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial
    Abdullah Raddah Kheshie
    Mohamed Salaheldien Mohamed Alayat
    Mohamed Mohamed Ebrahim Ali
    Lasers in Medical Science, 2014, 29 : 1371 - 1376
  • [37] High-intensity versus low-level laser therapy in the treatment of patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial
    Kheshie, Abdullah Raddah
    Alayat, Mohamed Salaheldien Mohamed
    Ali, Mohamed Mohamed Ebrahim
    LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 29 (04) : 1371 - 1376
  • [38] Argon laser peripheral iridoplasty versus conventional systemic medical therapy in treatment of acute primary angle-closure glaucoma - A prospective, randomized, controlled trial
    Lam, DSC
    Lai, JSM
    Tham, CCY
    Chua, JKH
    Poon, ASY
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2002, 109 (09) : 1591 - 1596
  • [39] Treatment of large overjet in Angle Class II: division 1 malocclusion with Andresen activators versus prefabricated functional appliances-a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial
    Cirgic, Emina
    Kjellberg, Heidrun
    Hansen, Ken
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2016, 38 (05) : 516 - 524
  • [40] High-precision stereotactic irradiation for focal drug-resistant epilepsy versus standard treatment: a randomized waitlist-controlled trial (the PRECISION trial)
    Zegers, C. M. L.
    Swinnen, A.
    Roumen, C.
    Hoffmann, A. L.
    Troost, E. G. C.
    van Asch, C. J. J.
    Brandts, L.
    Compter, I.
    Dieleman, E. M. T.
    Dijkstra, J. B.
    Granzier, M.
    Hendriks, M.
    Hofman, P.
    Houben, R. M. A.
    Ramaekers, B.
    Ronner, H. E.
    Rouhl, R. P. W.
    van der Salm, S.
    Santegoeds, R. G. C.
    Verhoeff, J. J.
    Wagner, G. L.
    Zwemmer, J.
    Schijns, Oemg
    Colon, A. J.
    Eekers, D. B. P.
    TRIALS, 2024, 25 (01)