Promoting Self-Management in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: Development of the Impact of Glucose Monitoring on Self-Management Scale

被引:0
|
作者
Vallis, Michael [1 ]
Berard, Lori [2 ]
Cosson, Emmanuel [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Kristensen, Finn Boerlum [6 ]
Levrat-Guillen, Fleur [7 ]
Naiditch, Nicolas [8 ]
Rabasa-Lhoret, Remi [9 ,10 ]
Polonsky, William [11 ]
机构
[1] Dalhousie Univ, Family Med, Halifax, NS, Canada
[2] Pink Pearls Inc, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
[3] Avicenne Hosp, AP HP Hop Univ Paris Seine St Denis, Bobigny, France
[4] Univ Sorbonne Paris Nord, Equipe Rech Epidemiol Nutr, Bobigny, France
[5] Univ Paris Cite, Ctr Res Epidemiol & Stat, INSERM, INRAE,CNAM, Bobigny, France
[6] Univ South Denmark, Dept Publ Hlth, Res Unit User Perspect, Odense, Denmark
[7] Abbott Diabet Care, Maidenhead, England
[8] Federat Francaise Diabet, Paris, Ile De France, France
[9] Inst Rech Clin Montreal, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[10] Univ Montreal, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[11] Behav Diabet Inst, San Diego, CA USA
关键词
continuous glucose monitoring; motivation; patient-reported outcome; self-management; DEVICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcjd.2024.07.001
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) management requires behavioural engagement to achieve optimal outcomes and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) technologies may facilitate self-management. In this study, we describe the development and validation of a self-report instrument, the Impact of Glucose Monitoring on Self-Management Scale (IGMSS), assessing the impact of device use (primarily CGM but also self-monitored blood glucose [SMBG]) on the capability, motivation, and opportunity to engage in self-management. Methods: Potential items were generated from 3 sources: themes and quotes from 13 adults with T2D motivated by CGM use who participated in a qualitative study; behaviour change theory identifying capability, opportunity, and motivation to self-manage; and expert committee review of items. An initial pool of 42 items were generated describing CGM as promoting personalized knowledge, improved health (Capability), improved relationships, having positive device characteristics (Opportunity), and improved engagement in self-management (Motivation). Based on expert committee consensus, items were written so as to be completed by those using any glucose-sensing device (SMBG and CGM). Psychometric evaluation was conducted with 514 English-speaking Canadians. Scale reduction (22 final items) was completed using item-response distribution, internal consistency, factor analysis, and expert opinion. Construct and convergent validity were evaluated using the Impact of Glucose Monitoring Satisfaction Scale, the Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire, the Diabetes Distress Scale, the 5-item World Health Organization Well-Being Index, and the Centre for Epidemiology Depression Scale. Test-retest reliability was determined for 130 participants. Results: Internal consistency was high for all scales, ranging from 0.73 to 0.91. Test-retest reliability ranged from 0.58 to 0.79, except for Device Characteristics. Construct and convergent validity indices were acceptable. There was substantial overlap between the IGMSS and established measures of CGM satisfaction. IGMSS findings were also predictive of self-management behaviour and emotional functioning. Conclusions: The IGMSS has positive psychometric characteristics and has the potential to screen people with T2D for engagement in diabetes self-management using CGM or any sensing device. Scores can be determined for various aspects of Capability (Personalized Knowledge, Improved Health), Opportunity (Relationships and Device Characteristics), and Motivation. (c) 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Canadian Diabetes Association. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Self-management of physical activity in adults with type 1 diabetes
    McCarthy, Margaret M.
    Whittemore, Robin
    Gholson, Georica
    Grey, Margaret
    APPLIED NURSING RESEARCH, 2017, 35 : 18 - 23
  • [22] Self-Management Strategies in Emerging Adults With Type 1 Diabetes
    Majumder, Elora
    Cogen, Fran R.
    Monaghan, Maureen
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC HEALTH CARE, 2017, 31 (01) : 29 - 36
  • [23] Self-Management of Physical Activity in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes
    McCarthy, Margaret
    Whittemore, Robin
    Gholson, Georica
    Grey, Margaret
    NURSING RESEARCH, 2017, 66 (02) : E8 - E9
  • [24] Challenges to Diabetes Self-Management in Emerging Adults With Type 1 Diabetes
    Ramchandani, Neesha
    Way, Niobe
    Melkus, Gail D'Eramo
    Sullivan-Bolyai, Susan
    DIABETES EDUCATOR, 2019, 45 (05): : 484 - 497
  • [25] Challenges to Diabetes Self-Management in Emerging Adults With Type 1 Diabetes
    Ramchandani, Neesha
    Way, Niobe
    Melkus, Gail D'Eramo
    Sullivan-Bolyai, Susan
    DIABETES EDUCATOR, 2019, 45 (04): : 453 - 453
  • [26] Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management Variables and Predictors
    Emery, Karin A.
    Robins, Jo
    Salyer, Jeanne
    Thurby-Hay, Linda
    Djira, Gemechis
    CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH, 2022, 31 (07) : 1250 - 1262
  • [27] Self-management in type 2 diabetes - The adolescent perspective
    Mulvaney, Shelagh A.
    Mudasiru, Eniola
    Schlundt, David G.
    Baughman, Cara L.
    Fleming, Mary
    VanderWoude, Ann
    Russell, William E.
    Elasy, Tom A.
    Rothman, Russell
    DIABETES EDUCATOR, 2008, 34 (04): : 674 - 682
  • [28] A self-management day for people with Type 2 diabetes
    Braham, N.
    Prazakova, P.
    Barnard, M. L.
    DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2018, 35 : 127 - 127
  • [29] Program to support Type 2 diabetes self-management
    James, S.
    Biviano, G.
    Alexander, K.
    Penny, B.
    Hazelwood, K.
    Jackson, L.
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2008, 79 : S50 - S50
  • [30] A case study of type 2 diabetes self-management
    Hsin-i Wu
    BioMedical Engineering OnLine, 4