Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion on Propofol Dose and Perioperative Pain During Moderate Sedation-Analgesia for Hysteroscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:0
|
作者
Yang, Fan
Wang, Jie [1 ]
Zhang, Huiwen
Zhang, Yonghai
Yang, Wanji
Gao, Ran
Yu, Jingfang
Chen, Xuexin [1 ]
Ma, Hanxiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Ningxia Med Univ, Gen Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, 804 Shengli South St, Yinchuan 750004, Peoples R China
来源
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
analgesia; hysteroscopy; lidocaine; propofol; sedation; POSTOPERATIVE FATIGUE; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; EFFICACY; GASTROSCOPY; SURGERY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.2147/DDDT.S484486
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Purpose: In China, the majority of hysteroscopic procedures require moderate sedation and analgesia. The efficacy of intravenous lidocaine in reducing the need for sedatives and alleviating perioperative pain during hysteroscopy remains equivocal. This study aims to determine whether the intravenous administration of lidocaine can reduce the required dose of propofol and enhance perioperative pain management. Patients and Methods: We conducted a prospective, single-center, double-blind randomized controlled trial involving patients with ASA I-II undergoing hysteroscopy. Forty patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either receive an intravenous bolus dose of 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine, followed by a continuous intravenous infusion at 4 mg/kg/h until the conclusion of the procedure, or an equivalent volume of normal saline. Propofol was then titrated to maintain a MOAA/S score of <= 2. Results: Compared with the control group, the lidocaine group showed a 13.8% decrease in the total dose of propofol (140.0[120.0, 155.0] mg vs 162.5[140.0, 197.5] mg), which was statistically significant (P = 0.014). The induction dose of propofol was 1.37 (1.29, 1.56) mg/kg in the lidocaine group and 1.61 (1.48, 1.94) mg/kg in the control group, respectively (P = 0.001). However, no significant differences were observed between the groups regarding the supplemental dose of propofol (P = 0.062), the number of involuntary movements during hysteroscopy (P = 0.384), or postoperative pain scores (T0: P = 0.628; T1: P = 0.886; T2: P = 0.711). Additionally, the incidence of intraoperative hypoxia (P = 1.000) and fatigue scores (T0: P = 0.878; T1: P = 0.401; T2: P = 0.056) between the two groups were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Intravenous lidocaine reduces the dose requirements of propofol during the induction phase of anesthesia. However, it does not have a significant influence on alleviating intraoperative and postoperative pain during hysteroscopic procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:5873 / 5880
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Utility of High-Flow Oxygen During Emergency Department Procedural Sedation and Analgesia With Propofol: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
    Deitch, Kenneth
    Chudnofsky, Carl R.
    Dominici, Paul
    Latta, Daniel
    Salamanca, Yidy
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2011, 58 (04) : 360 - 364
  • [32] Nonanesthesiologist-Administered Propofol Versus Midazolam and Propofol, Titrated to Moderate Sedation, for Colonoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Molina-Infante, Javier
    Duenas-Sadornil, Carmen
    Mateos-Rodriguez, Jose M.
    Perez-Gallardo, Belen
    Vinagre-Rodriguez, Gema
    Hernandez-Alonso, Moises
    Fernandez-Bermejo, Miguel
    Gonzalez-Huix, Ferran
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2012, 57 (09) : 2385 - 2393
  • [33] Nonanesthesiologist-Administered Propofol Versus Midazolam and Propofol, Titrated to Moderate Sedation, for Colonoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Javier Molina-Infante
    Carmen Dueñas-Sadornil
    Jose M. Mateos-Rodriguez
    Belen Perez-Gallardo
    Gema Vinagre-Rodríguez
    Moises Hernandez-Alonso
    Miguel Fernandez-Bermejo
    Ferran Gonzalez-Huix
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2012, 57 : 2385 - 2393
  • [34] Intrauterine lidocaine infusion for pain management during outpatient transcervical tubal sterilization: a randomized controlled trial
    Isley, Michelle M.
    Jensen, Jeffrey T.
    Nichols, Mark D.
    Lehman, Amy
    Bednarek, Paula
    Edelman, Alison
    CONTRACEPTION, 2012, 85 (03) : 275 - 281
  • [35] Effect of target controlled propofol infusion versus intermittent boluses during oesophagogastroduodenoscopy: a randomized controlled trial
    Ndosi, Catherine
    Mung'ayi, Vitalis
    Gisore, Ednah
    Mir, Samina
    AFRICAN HEALTH SCIENCES, 2019, 19 (04) : 3136 - 3145
  • [36] Efficacy of Perioperative Continuous Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion for 72 Hours on Postoperative Pain and Recovery in Patients Undergoing Hepatectomy: Study Protocol for a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
    Xu, Yan
    Ye, Mao
    Hong, Ying
    Kang, Yi
    Li, Yue
    Xiao, Xiao
    Zhou, Li
    Jiang, Chunling
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2021, 14 : 3665 - 3674
  • [37] Intravenous lidocaine relieves spinal cord injury pain - A randomized controlled trial
    Finnerup, NB
    Biering-Sorensen, F
    Johannesen, IL
    Terkelsen, AJ
    Juhl, GI
    Kristensen, AD
    Sindrup, SH
    Bach, FW
    Jensen, TS
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2005, 102 (05) : 1023 - 1030
  • [38] A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Injected Buffered Lidocaine, Lidocaine Cream, and No Analgesia for Peripheral Intravenous Cannula Insertion
    McNaughton, C.
    Zhou, C.
    Roberts, L.
    Storrow, A.
    Kennedy, R.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2008, 52 (04) : S75 - S75
  • [39] Intermittent manually controlled versus continuous infusion of propofol for deep sedation during interventional endoscopy: A prospective randomized trial
    Riphaus, Andrea
    Geist, Christoph
    Schrader, Kerstin
    Martchenko, Ksenia
    Wehrmann, Till
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 47 (8-9) : 1078 - 1085
  • [40] A comparison of sedation with dexmedetomidine or propofol during shockwave lithotripsy: A Randomized controlled trial
    Kaygusuz, Kenan
    Gokce, Gokhan
    Gursoy, Sinan
    Ayan, Semih
    Mimaroglu, Caner
    Gultekin, Yener
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2008, 106 (01): : 114 - 119