Comparative Cost Analysis of Secondary Intraocular Lens Surgeries Using Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing

被引:0
|
作者
Pan, Warren w. [1 ]
Young, Crystal [2 ]
Portney, David [1 ]
Fowler, Amanda [1 ]
Mian, Shahzad i. [1 ]
Eton, Emily [1 ]
Wubben, Thomas j. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Kellogg Eye Ctr, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Med Sch, Ann Arbor, MI USA
关键词
CATARACT-SURGERY; VITRECTOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajo.2025.02.008
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
center dot OBJECTIVE: To assess the economics of secondary intraocular lens (IOL) surgeries, with a focus on variations in day-of-surgery costs based on surgical approach and number of surgeons involved. center dot DESIGN: Retrospective, time-driven, activity-based costing study analyzing costs and reimbursement rates. center dot SETTING: University of Michigan Kellogg Eye Center, analyzing procedures performed between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2023. center dot PARTICIPANTS: Patients undergoing secondary IOL surgeries, including both single- and multi-surgeon cases and procedures without vitrectomy, with anterior vitrectomy, and with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). center dot METHODS: Data were obtained from the institution's Electronic Health Record and Revenue Department secondary IOL surgeries (Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] codes 66985 and 66986) performed over 10 years at a single academic institution. Time-driven activity- based costing was applied to calculate the costs associated with each procedure. Primary outcomes were the total cost, reimbursement, and net margins for secondary IOL surgeries. Secondary outcomes were surgical times, time- related costs, and material costs. center dot RESULTS: A total of 391 cases were included in this analysis over a 10-year period, including 145 without vitrectomy, 56 with anterior vitrectomy, and 190 with PPV. There was no difference in primary or secondary outcome measures between IOL insertion (CPT 66985) and IOL exchange (CPT 66986). The total day- of-surgery costs were $4248.40 to $4447.15 for secondary IOL without vitrectomy, $4245.05 to $4600.36 for secondary IOL with anterior vitrectomy, $5518.52 to $5272.21 for single-surgeon secondary IOL with PPV, and $7769.22 to $8609.39 for multiple-surgeon secondary IOL with PPV. The calculated Medicare reim bursements were $2771.67 to $2901.81 for secondary IOL without vitrectomy, $3005.66 to $3155.75 for secondary IOL with anterior vitrectomy, and $4813.26 to $4861.62 for secondary IOL with PPV. Therefore, the net margins were-($1675.48-$1347.59) for secondary IOL without vitrectomy,-($1444.60-$1239.39) for secondary IOL with anterior vitrectomy,-($704.26$410.59) for single-surgeon secondary IOL with PPV, and-($3796.13-$2907.60) for multiple-surgeon secondary IOL with PPV. center dot CONCLUSIONS: All secondary IOL surgeries result in net negative margins with single-surgeon PPV cases having the most favorable reimbursement that covers 87% to 92% of day-of-surgery costs and multiple-surgeon PPV surgeries having the least favorable with only 56% to 63% of costs reimbursed. Identifying these cost-intensive procedures offers insights for potential cost-reduction strategies, supporting both economic viability and patient access to necessary eye care. (Am J Ophthalmol 2025;273: 159-166. (c) 2025 Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 166
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing in the Assembly Industry
    Vedernikova, Olga
    Siguenza-Guzman, Lorena
    Pesantez, Johanna
    Arcentales-Carrion, Rodrigo
    AUSTRALASIAN ACCOUNTING BUSINESS AND FINANCE JOURNAL, 2020, 14 (04) : 3 - 23
  • [22] A primer on time-driven activity-based costing in brachytherapy
    Mulherkar, Ria
    Keller, Andrew
    Showalter, Timothy N.
    Thaker, Nikhil
    Beriwal, Sushil
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2022, 21 (01) : 43 - 48
  • [23] Improving healthcare performance through Activity-Based Costing and Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing
    Ninerola, Angels
    Hernandez-Lara, Ana-Beatriz
    Sanchez-Rebull, Maria-Victoria
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 36 (06): : 2079 - 2093
  • [24] Time-driven activity-based costing for public services
    Stouthuysen, Kristof
    Schierhout, Kevin
    Roodhooft, Filip
    Reusen, Evelien
    PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT, 2014, 34 (04) : 289 - 296
  • [25] Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing in Radiology: An Overview
    Shankar, Prasad R.
    Hayatghaibi, Shireen E.
    Anzai, Yoshimi
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 17 (01) : 125 - 130
  • [26] Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing Trumps Traditional Cost Accounting for Radiologists
    Misono, Alexander S.
    Oklu, Rahmi
    Prabhakar, Anand M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2015, 204 (02) : W217 - W217
  • [27] Cost Reduction in Cardiothoracic Surgery: The Case for Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing
    Vervoort, Dominique
    Swain, JaBaris D.
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2022, 113 (03): : 715 - 718
  • [28] A pragmatic method for costing implementation strategies using the time-driven activity-based costing
    Cidav, Zuleyha
    Pyne, Jeff
    Mandell, David
    Beidas, Rinad
    Curran, Geoffrey
    Mautone, Jennifer
    Eiraldi, Ricardo
    Marcus, Steven
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2020, 15
  • [29] Improving Efficiency Using Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing Methodology
    Tibor, Laura C.
    Schultz, Stacy R.
    Menaker, Ronald
    Weber, Bradley D.
    Ness, Jay
    Smith, Paula
    Young, Phillip M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 14 (03) : 353 - 358
  • [30] Assessing the cost of cancer care delivery using a time-driven, activity-based costing software
    Incalcaterra, James
    Guzman, Alexis B.
    Huang, Yu-Ting
    DelValle-Garza, Monica
    Kolom, Christian C.
    Zhao, Xin
    Mutua, Danson N.
    Dhingra, Krishan
    Feeley, Thomas W.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (07)