A child-centred research checklist to improve the design and reporting of paediatric research studies: A descriptive mixed methods study

被引:4
|
作者
Foster, Mandie [1 ,2 ]
Whitehead, L. Lisa [2 ,3 ]
O'Sullivan, Therese A. [4 ]
Hill, Julie [4 ]
Morelius, Evalotte [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Auckland Univ Technol, Sch Clin Sci, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Joondalup, WA, Australia
[3] Univ Otago, Ctr Postgrad Nursing Studies, Christchurch, New Zealand
[4] Edith Cowan Univ, Nutr & Hlth Innovat Res Inst, Sch Hlth & Med Sci, Joondalup, WA, Australia
[5] Linkopings Univ, Dept Hlth Med & Caring Sci, Linkoping, Sweden
关键词
Children; Checklist; Delphi technique; Ethics; Interdisciplinary research; Paediatric; Research; HEALTH-CARE; PARTICIPATION; CONSENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104958
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: No internationally developed child-centred research checklist is currently available to enhance the quality and transparency of the development, reporting and evaluation of research undertaken with children. Objective: To develop an internationally relevant, expert informed child-centred research checklist. Design: A descriptive mixed methods study was undertaken in five sequential phases, including a Delphi component. Setting(s): Academic/international context. Methods: This study involved five sequential stages: 1. Literature review using four databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE, Scopus, PsycINFO) and analysis to identify key themes in child-centred research (January 2020). 2. Generate a questionnaire based on the key themes for international experts in child research to provide their opinions on what should be included in a child-centred research checklist (March 2020). 3. Inductive thematic analysis of the experts' responses to generate the initial draft checklist (June 2020). 4. The checklist progressed through three rounds of Delphi study for a wider range of experts to provide their consensus on what a child-centred research checklist should contain (August 2020-February 2021). 5. Refinement of the child-centred research checklist based on the Delphi study (March 2021-November 2022). Results: A total of 160 articles met the inclusion criteria for review and were considered in the development of a 10-item open-ended questionnaire, adapted for four age-brackets (0-1 yrs., 2-4 yrs., 5-10 yrs., >11 yrs). Responses from 14 experts across 10 countries generated 205 generic statements and 76 examples to inform a child- centred research checklist. Following this, 158 experts from eleven disciplines across 18 countries participated in the three round Delphi study (38 % retention rate over the three rounds). The final checklist includes 11 statements and 17 examples represented under three categories of "child-parent consent, assent and dissent", "code of conduct" and "child focused methods". Conclusion: The child-centred research checklist was generated from a mixed methods study undertaken in five sequential phases, with input by 172 experts from 11 disciplines across 19 countries. The child-centred research checklist is the first international, expert informed tool to support good quality and transparent child-centred research. We call on researchers, clinicians, journal editors, organisations, and ethics committees to use this checklist for future research with children. The next phase of this project is engagement with children and their families to refine the checklist. Tweetable abstract: New checklist to support good quality child research practices @IFNAorg.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Identifying research priorities for infection prevention and control. A mixed methods study with a convergent design
    Smiddy, Mp
    Burton, E.
    Kingston, L.
    Poovelikunnel, T. Thomas
    Moyo, M.
    Flores, A.
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION PREVENTION, 2024, 25 (03) : 59 - 65
  • [32] Ethical and policy issues in cluster randomized trials: rationale and design of a mixed methods research study
    Monica Taljaard
    Charles Weijer
    Jeremy M Grimshaw
    Judith Belle Brown
    Ariella Binik
    Robert Boruch
    Jamie C Brehaut
    Shazia H Chaudhry
    Martin P Eccles
    Andrew McRae
    Raphael Saginur
    Merrick Zwarenstein
    Allan Donner
    Trials, 10
  • [33] Research Implications for Future Telemedicine Studies and Innovations in Diabetes and Hypertension-A Mixed Methods Study
    Timpel, Patrick
    Harst, Lorenz
    NUTRIENTS, 2020, 12 (05)
  • [34] Methods and operational aspects of human-centred design into research processes for individuals with multiple chronic conditions: A survey study
    Han, Hae-Ra
    Lee, Ji Won
    Saylor, Martha Abshire
    Parisi, Jeanine M.
    Hornstein, Erika
    Agarwalla, Vidisha
    Jajodia, Anushka
    Li, Qiwei
    Weikert, Mike
    Davidson, Patricia M.
    Szanton, Sarah L.
    NURSING OPEN, 2023, 10 (05): : 3075 - 3083
  • [35] Developing a strategy to improve data sharing in health research: A mixed-methods study to identify barriers and facilitators
    Krahe, Michelle A.
    Wolski, Malcolm
    Mickan, Sharon
    Toohey, Julie
    Scuffham, Paul
    Reilly, Sheena
    HEALTH INFORMATION MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2023, 52 (01) : 18 - 27
  • [36] Doing challenging research studies in a patient-centred way: a qualitative study to inform a randomised controlled trial in the paediatric emergency care setting
    Woolfall, Kerry
    Young, Bridget
    Frith, Lucy
    Appleton, Richard
    Iyer, Anand
    Messahel, Shrouk
    Hickey, Helen
    Gamble, Carrol
    BMJ OPEN, 2014, 4 (05):
  • [37] The Impact of Intervention Design on User Engagement in Digital Therapeutics Research: Factorial Experiment With a Mixed Methods Study
    Lee, Hyerim
    Choi, Eung Ho
    Shin, Jung U.
    Kim, Tae-Gyun
    Oh, Jooyoung
    Shin, Bokyoung
    Sim, Jung Yeon
    Shin, Jaeyong
    Kim, Meelim
    JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 2024, 8
  • [38] Factors associated with the timely completion of doctoral research studies in clinical pharmacy: A mixed-methods study
    Mosanya, Adaobi U.
    Ukoha-kalu, Blessing O.
    Isah, Abdulmuminu
    Umeh, Ifeoma
    Amorha, Kosisochi C.
    Ayogu, Ebere E.
    Ubaka, Chukwuemeka
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (09):
  • [39] A Systematic Review of Methods and Procedures Used in Ecological Momentary Assessments of Diet and Physical Activity Research in Youth: An Adapted STROBE Checklist for Reporting EMA Studies (CREMAS)
    Liao, Yue
    Skelton, Kara
    Dunton, Genevieve
    Bruening, Meg
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2016, 18 (06)
  • [40] Community collaboration to improve access and outcomes in breast cancer reconstruction: protocol for a mixed-methods qualitative research study
    Mundy, Lily R.
    Stukes, Bryanna
    Njoroge, Moreen
    Fish, Laura Jane
    Sergesketter, Amanda R.
    Wang, Sabrina M.
    Worthy, Valarie
    Fayanju, Oluwadamilola M.
    Greenup, Rachel A.
    Hollenbeck, Scott T.
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (11):